Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: After 160 degree thermostat?

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Camby, IN.
    Posts
    49

    After 160 degree thermostat?

    Quick question about after you install a 160 degree thermostat. What would you have to adjust in your tune for the change in thermostats? Thanks for the help.
    2002 GMC Sierra Ext. Cab, 2wd, 5.3 & Automatic. Shift kit with Corvette Servo, CAI, Comp camshaft, LS6 valve springs, Gibson headers & catback exh. TCI SF3000 Converter, MAFless with HP Tuners.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    Just the fan enable/disable temps.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  3. #3
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    i have mine set at 183/179 187/184 and that keeps my coolant temps at about 180ish in stop and go traffic
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    The main point in going to a lower 'stat is to get the
    ability to run more timing, leaner mixture, or both.
    Or, just run the settings you've got without ping.

    I run my fans even lower. I want the 'stat to have
    authority, not the fans. I don't mind the low speed
    fan running full time on the street. I plan to switch
    to thermostatic fan control eventually and control
    for a 160F tank temp, rather than a 180F block
    temp. But that wasn't the question.

    Once you have a stable, low-swing coolant temp
    range then you would start in on the performance
    tuning and find the limits, given consistent engine
    temp environment. And bearing in mind that a low
    temp 'stat still isn't going to do anything, on a 95F
    day with the A/C on....

  5. #5
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Camby, IN.
    Posts
    49
    Have noticed that it helps keep the trans temp down a little bit on hot days as well. My truck does not have e-fans, so was more interested in changes that might be needed to timing. But you hit on it for me, will try and log some time with more timing and see what that does. Thanks for your input, hope this helps others as well. More info the better we are.
    2002 GMC Sierra Ext. Cab, 2wd, 5.3 & Automatic. Shift kit with Corvette Servo, CAI, Comp camshaft, LS6 valve springs, Gibson headers & catback exh. TCI SF3000 Converter, MAFless with HP Tuners.

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    You will be able to run a tad more timing, i wouldnt go more than a couple degrees, but you will also be able to pull a tad bit of fuel. Main thing like said before, you will just have less chance of detonation.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  7. #7
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    95
    I dont like to rock the boat, so sorry guys

    You want your engine to run hot (200 - 212) and have the inlet air temperature (IAT) as cool as possible for max power.

    Cold thermostat were often used to get the engine to run richer

    LS1 LS2 LS7 tuner, L98, LT1 & Haltec

  8. #8
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    i dont know about that, it wont be as eff. when its cooler but the airmass is also cooler which makes more power. at least thats how it worked out in models we studied in thermo 2
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  9. #9
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    95
    LS1 LS2 LS7 tuner, L98, LT1 & Haltec

  10. #10
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    i know a lot of people that have dynoed at differnt ect levels and the 180 mark seemed to be best. what makes power in nascar is possible that it wont work for us, totally different beasts. the colder the air, the less effiecent it is for a set timing value, colder temps you can run more timing, making more power and a full burn. now if you leave the same settings for fueling and timing then more heat will make more power. it also depends on temps at the cyl of the coolant, which is hard to measure really.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  11. #11
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    plus a hot motor heats up the incomming air a fair amount, so that hurts the inlet temps
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  12. #12
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    95
    If you use a 'over the radiator cold air intake' and the car is actualy moving the IAT comes down to almost the ambient temperature.

    So, dialing in the engine coolant temperature (ECT) is what is important and a too cold thermostat will leave the cylinders to cold and not produce the best HP.

    Originaly, I was trying to determine what is the best ECT for a LS1 as at the drags the engine sits in the 200-212 range.
    LS1 LS2 LS7 tuner, L98, LT1 & Haltec

  13. #13
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    i guess it also would depend on the set up too. as far as intake temp, yes intake temps my be cold, but with high ect the temp right before it enters the chamber will be hotter. that is the point i am trying to make. yes the air moves fast but it heats up fast as well. same reason noone uses a cast intake, they heat the air up way too much.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  14. #14
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Camby, IN.
    Posts
    49
    Let me throw a wrench into the mix. If you have a high stall converter, then there will be more heat generated, as the converter allows the rpms to come up. But once in lock up, this does not become a factor. So if you are worried about the temps not getting hot enough for max power, the small difference betwen the two is minimal. Most cases the engine temp rides around 170 - 180 degrees when fully warmed up. Think that it produces the power I am looking for at that temp. Just wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking something, as the truck use to carry 200 degrees before the stat change. The heater will still run you out of the cab, so I don't think heat in the engine is an issue here.
    2002 GMC Sierra Ext. Cab, 2wd, 5.3 & Automatic. Shift kit with Corvette Servo, CAI, Comp camshaft, LS6 valve springs, Gibson headers & catback exh. TCI SF3000 Converter, MAFless with HP Tuners.

  15. #15
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5
    I am not sure about the thermal aspects of it but if you look at the ect spark adder table anything under 185 at or around idle takes timing away and anything above 221 above idle also takes timing away so if you are planning on running a colder thermostat or even plan on running hotter shouldnt this table be edited so that it doesn't have a negative affect. if not this could be the reason for better power at higher temps in our engines.

    Does anyone have a hypertech tune that could look and see if they edited this table for the colder thermostat?