Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Timing Tuning ?

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Dubai,United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    81

    Timing Tuning ?

    How do you guys do it ? Do you :

    1- Add a number to the entire table nad keep going until you get KR then reduce timing in the affected areas ?
    OR
    2- Tune specific areas/rpm ranges ? For example > .76 gm/sec & > 3000 rpm ? Then smooth the transition to those cells ?

    Also , from experience what are :

    1- Best Timing Values on LS1s ? Stock ? With Bolt ons ?
    2- Best Timing for LS1s on N20 ?

    Thanks Guys
    03 Mercedes ML55 AMG - Stock
    06 S2000
    06 GMC Sierra 3500 - Tuned
    09 GT-R - Stock
    09 Lexus LX570
    10 Camaro SS , Bolt Ons , Tuned

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,579

    Re: Timing Tuning ?

    I like adding timing at specific locations, but I would have to strongly recommend this be done on a dyno to verify that the target timing produces the most HP.

    As for what timing is the best ... it really depends on the vehicle for that. And as for nitrous ... I am not a nitrous guru, so I wouldn't know. ???

  3. #3
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Dubai,United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    81

    Re: Timing Tuning ?

    Cool. I will be doing so on a Dyno . Note Chevy Perfomance mag suggests the following :

    Add a couple of degrees of timing to the 0.76 g/cyl row and copy this data to the higher g/cyl rows. Use the 0.72 and 0.74 g/cyl rows to smooth the transition to the 0.76 g/cyl and higher rows.

    I've seen people add +6 to the whole table to start with then add 1* as they go along.

    I would like to know something though, to better decide between both approaches. Is their any advantages/disadvantages to adding timing to the low load cells ? i.e. below .72 ?

    Also the reason I'm worried about the Nitrous is in general I heard people RETARD timing for Nitrous so a setup for max NA performance might not be what the doctor ordered for N20 ???
    03 Mercedes ML55 AMG - Stock
    06 S2000
    06 GMC Sierra 3500 - Tuned
    09 GT-R - Stock
    09 Lexus LX570
    10 Camaro SS , Bolt Ons , Tuned

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387

    Re: Timing Tuning ?

    I transitioned the theoretical timing table into my stock table with very good results...
    when I have some time for a dyno run or 7 I'm going to check and see where teh best timing is....
    I seem to remember on my old car it was at 27*...
    so after I pasted that table(and saw no knock except for 1* in just a few spots)
    I decided to reduce the table until I saw 27 on teh top end...
    I did notice that under heavy load...and low low rpm..I had some knock....so I pulled that out...
    and teh car feels extremely powerful in all ranges....
    I put back in teh stock tabel to feel it..and it feels liek a slug compared to the new values...

    things to remember..the max theoretical timing table does not exactly match the high and low octane #'s..you have to do a little interpolation between rows and columns.
    -Scott -

  5. #5
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    timing is based on your package, has a lot to do with valve events and the combustion chamber design. best way is the dyno for sure, you dont want to flatline your timing, you want a dip around max torque. AFAIK that is to create more pressure, also with added fuel, to make more timing in the car. i dropped my timing from 29* to 25* at 4400 rpm-4800 rpm and noticed a big difference in power, mainly because i couldnt keep the tires hooked in 2nd no longer, before it wouldnt spin in 2nd on accel until high rpms, sometimes. i also compaired values such as dynamic airflow (which will get scrwey with wheel spin as well so if you are spinning you cant compair) also compaired various acceleration times.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  6. #6
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    also, .72 g/cyl is high load, i see about 0.88-0.90 g/cyl WOT on my car, take a log of the timing advance and you will see what cells you hit when
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    My timing table right now reads 25-27* WOT timing in most places and I still consistently see 30* on the scanner, whats up with this?

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  8. #8
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Check out the spark corrections, If you are in SD make sure that both high and low have been set. Sometimes I forgot to go back to the low octane to make changes, when I didnt have 1 bar sd package. also check out the correction tables and make sure it isnt adding anywhere. Just double check WOT cells and confirm they are WOT cells with a log and see waht g/cyl you are at
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    Yeah I am now using a start of the stock Z06 timing table with a bit of smoothing out done. I am now commanding 23-24* and still consistently hitting 28-29* at WOT. I am looking at the adders now, will let you know.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  10. #10
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    My AFR adder was kind of aggressive. It added alot of timing quickly so i backed that off some and smoothed it out.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  11. #11
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Springfield, IL
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by soundengineer
    I transitioned the theoretical timing table into my stock table with very good results...

    things to remember..the max theoretical timing table does not exactly match the high and low octane #'s..you have to do a little interpolation between rows and columns.
    Why did you transition the theoretical table into the stock (high octane?) table? I'm assuming the theoretical table is another parameter we can modify in the editor?

    What interpolation is it that you're referring to? Averaging the values?
    2016 Camaro SS

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    Yes he means the values were somewhere in between neighboring cells. The Max Torque table should NOT ever be modified, but it has worked for alot of people as a timing start.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  13. #13
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    i have changed my max torque timing table, i dont really see why you shouldnt change it. although we really dont have a full understanding of what this does. i got help on timing from a guy that used the dyno to build the octane tables, he also modified this table. i would like abetter understanding of it though
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    arkansas
    Posts
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisj6
    Yes he means the values were somewhere in between neighboring cells. The Max Torque table should NOT ever be modified, but it has worked for alot of people as a timing start.

    Chris
    what if you put in a bigger motor then do you not change it??
    '04 Tahoe AWD, trickperformance turbo kit, TC78 turbo, 4"magnaflow muffler, Circle D triple disc 3,000, FLT LVL 7 4L60E, L92, 227/235 111lsa.
    Old 5.3=12.33 @110mph
    http://www.streetfire.net/video/turb...mph_741849.htm

  15. #15
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Camby, IN.
    Posts
    49
    For those of us that don't have access to a dyno, a drag strip or long flat highway works, while logging some runs, you can see what cells to use for increased timing. Make some soft runs through the gears, and full throttle blasts. Then after making changes to these cells, you can log again and check for KR and back off those cells that record some KR. May not be as acurate as a dyno, but worked for me.
    2002 GMC Sierra Ext. Cab, 2wd, 5.3 & Automatic. Shift kit with Corvette Servo, CAI, Comp camshaft, LS6 valve springs, Gibson headers & catback exh. TCI SF3000 Converter, MAFless with HP Tuners.

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    I would think you would probably want to use the max torque timing table of a motor close to the size you put in.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    13
    what happens if you max out the cells on the timing table?

    Logging last night I was hittin 1.16 g/cyl on the timing table and I didn't even bring it past peak hp (~6500rpm) It only goes to 1.20 g/cyl right?
    2004 GTO
    408 Iron block
    AFR 225
    242/248 .608/.610 110 cam (247/252 .644/.638 113 cam going in)
    11.3:1
    SD tuned by soundengineer!!!

    1991 RX7 LS6 swap
    LME 347
    Patriot LS6 heads 57cc
    EWP/FAST90
    MS4 cam on a 109.5+2
    11.7:1scr/8.75:1dcr
    SD openloop tune w/LC1
    225 shot

  18. #18
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    hmm good question. that would mena you are moving 72 #/ min of air if you were at about 6500. are you n/a? and what kinda power are you putting to the ground?
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  19. #19
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by ws6firebirdta00
    hmm good question. that would mena you are moving 72 #/ min of air if you were at about 6500. are you n/a? and what kinda power are you putting to the ground?
    Yep NA. Not sure about power, haven't had it dynoed yet. Been doing all my tuning via wideband.

    FWIW it'll spin the tires from a roll at any rpm >3k in third and lights em up at the torque peak in 4th. It's a monster. Scott (soundengineer knows)

    What calc did you use to convert g/cyl to #/min ?
    2004 GTO
    408 Iron block
    AFR 225
    242/248 .608/.610 110 cam (247/252 .644/.638 113 cam going in)
    11.3:1
    SD tuned by soundengineer!!!

    1991 RX7 LS6 swap
    LME 347
    Patriot LS6 heads 57cc
    EWP/FAST90
    MS4 cam on a 109.5+2
    11.7:1scr/8.75:1dcr
    SD openloop tune w/LC1
    225 shot

  20. #20
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    its in the editor, i bet thats a beast, its what i want to go with, i got a price now i just need money! haha id like to see what you make iwth that cam as i want to go with something that has similar lift and around that range of duration (right now its all a dream though lol)

    i would imagine if the table goes above 1.20 it just uses the last values in the table, which is fine for WOT anyway. im suprised i havent read about this before though, hell my little motor will read 0.92 WOT those big motors must be at the limit all the time.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

Similar Threads

  1. Correct Tuning Procedures
    By Jax5.7 in forum GM V8 Tuning - Engine, Gas (Gen 3)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-12-2022, 11:51 AM
  2. Tuning for Timing.
    By chummmma in forum GM V8 Tuning - Engine, Gas (Gen 3)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-28-2007, 02:06 PM
  3. VE tuning timing prob.
    By PurplePiss in forum GM V8 Tuning - Engine, Gas (Gen 4)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 02:22 AM
  4. Tuning for mileage/cruise timing limit?
    By never0101 in forum GM V6 Tuning - Engine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 06:43 PM
  5. H2 Timing - anyone here tuning their H2
    By BLOWNZ06 in forum GM V8 Tuning - Engine, Gas (Gen 3)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2005, 06:44 AM