Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Power loss with inadequate injectors?

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    4

    Power loss with inadequate injectors?

    I logged Inj. Duty Cycle today and it was 110-126% from 5000+. Am I losing quite a bit of power from my injectors being maxed out? Also, are 42lbs ideal for a big cam/stock heads/full bolton car? I ran 89mph in the 1/8 before cam and intake and I'm still running the same now. I'm hoping its fuel related.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by jpolser
    I logged Inj. Duty Cycle today and it was 110-126% from 5000+. Am I losing quite a bit of power from my injectors being maxed out? Also, are 42lbs ideal for a big cam/stock heads/full bolton car? I ran 89mph in the 1/8 before cam and intake and I'm still running the same now. I'm hoping its fuel related.

    You're definitely out of injector, which is not safe. Ideally stay 80% or so, no more than 90% is ideal.

    It only affects performance if you are leaning out due to running out of fuel, but even if the A/F is not trailing off it is a bit dangerous to run that way.

    Jody

  3. #3
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by jpolser
    I logged Inj. Duty Cycle today and it was 110-126% from 5000+. Am I losing quite a bit of power from my injectors being maxed out? Also, are 42lbs ideal for a big cam/stock heads/full bolton car? I ran 89mph in the 1/8 before cam and intake and I'm still running the same now. I'm hoping its fuel related.
    On a car with 100% duty at 5500rpm, when we changed from 28lb to 36lb the car only made more peak power ie the same curve but to a higher peak.

    Joe
    LS1 LS2 LS7 tuner, L98, LT1 & Haltec

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    In fact you cannot get over 100%.

    Since the stock tune is pig rich, a 10% shortfall in
    available duty cycle on a stock car might actually
    be better (performance wise) than more injector.
    But presumably by the time you get to flowing the
    air it takes to max stockers out, you're more than
    ready to do it right, tune for proper commanded
    fueling and true up the fuel delivery and airflow
    so what you say is what you get.

    Bolt-ons car could probably get by with SVO 30#
    or Delphi 32, 36 but soince they all cost the same
    and aren't much different in the tuning effort, may
    as well go for the 42#ers; lots of them in use and
    folks around who have already bedded theirs in,
    for tune examples.

  5. #5
    I have heads and cam, with SVO 30's and im already back up to 105% duty cycle at 6K+ at 13.0:1 A:F Moral of the story is: Go bigger.


    - 2002 - M6 - Hurst/LSS - No TCS
    - 232/234 .595/.598 112 +2 - 7.4 PRs - Melling Lifters
    - Stage 1 DIY Heads - Milled .040 - 10.9:1 CR - PP Golds
    - Jethot LTs - DIY True Duals - Magnaflow 2.5 - SLP CME - Dual Cutouts
    - Motive 4.10s, Moser Axles, SLP cover, Built 10 bolt
    - TSP lid - FTRA - Ported TB - Ported MAF
    - HPTuners - LC1 - Matched SVO 30s
    - TTIIs - 275/315 - SFCs

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner Dragman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    491
    If a guy was using a 42 lbers what do u set Injector offset table to?? Or would u just leave table stock??

  7. #7
    Супер Модератор EC_Tune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Almost 2000 feet.
    Posts
    7,876
    Most are leaving the Offset table alone. You would need the values from a similar vehicle with the same injectors to be sure.
    Always Support Our Troops!

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner Dragman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    491
    Quote Originally Posted by EC_Tune
    Most are leaving the Offset table alone. You would need the values from a similar vehicle with the same injectors to be sure.
    never have saw one that is suppose to be correct!!!!!

  9. #9
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    The only in-car way I can see, is to set up the IFR table
    properly and then work the injector offset table to get
    back to the same hot idle LTFT+STFT value you saw
    right before the swap (idle being the shortest pulse width
    and most affected). Then you would be back to the same
    quality of model that you had before (for whatever that's
    worth).

    From what little dynamic flow data I've acquired, there
    is a fair bit of variability in the offset - anywhere from
    0.5 to 0.8mS - even within "family". Not to mention that
    said data comes with no info on system voltage, a prime
    actor. So leaving it alone, is as much of a guess as
    guessing blind. Unless you got lucky and picked a type
    that happened to be similar to stock in its offset profile.

    I've been accumulating the gear for an injector flow bench
    to do fine injector pulsed testing (I made one before but
    the electronics are too sloppy for anything more than
    group matching). Have to find the time to cobble up an
    accurate pulse driver, I'm all set for the plumbing and
    the variable power supply is on the brown truck.

    My first test will be to extract data from a stock injector
    set and compare that to the stock table at center and
    corners. If that comes out to anything worth believing
    then I'll be doing my Delphi 32# and after that, requests.

  10. #10
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    I multiplied my offset table by 0.7 for the FMS 42#ers
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  11. #11
    Супер Модератор EC_Tune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Almost 2000 feet.
    Posts
    7,876
    Jimmy,
    You going to be using Stoddard fluid or ??? for testing.
    Stoddard is supposed to be close to gasoline with out the fire hazard. I need to read up a bit more on the fluid end of things.

    EC
    Always Support Our Troops!