Less timing and tr6 plugs at a high levelOriginally Posted by JWWOC02
Less timing and tr6 plugs at a high level
'18 Sierra L5P
'03 Sierra 4.8/NV 3500: LS6 Cam, HPT Tuned
'15 Explorer Sport - SCT, AEM (Wife says...it feels faster??)
'01 Z06
Would the tune I posted on here be safe with e85?
You're running the timing table that Russ provided? I took a look at it and it had a LOT of timing compared to my truck. Any knock retard with it?
2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS
Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado
I don't think I messed with it. What kind of gains did you get with yours? Do you run e85?
I did take timing out up to 2800 rpm this weekend
Note that I zeroed the AFR & Variable valve timing spark tables.
Russ Kemp
Russ if I do this will I be able to run E85 and have better gains than 93?
a 2011 5.3 has a variable cam? That timing table is active?
Just wanted to bump this with my findings using most of Russ' timing table. My city MPG has gone from 14.5mpg to 16+mpg and the truck requires so little throttle to get moving.
I was skeptical at first because the timing was so much compared to the stock tune, but when you factor in my truck having headers and running 92 octane fuel, it makes sense.
Great work on that timing table Russ.
2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS
Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado
would these timing and transmission tables work for a 6.2 sierra as well?
'09 cobalt ss. hahn intercooler, intake, cp,catless downpipe, ottp stage 2 mounts, hptuners, gmpp 3bar tmap sensors, hybrid hp tuned
I wouldn't. Completely different engine.
2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS
Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado
I looked at his trans settings, and tried to follow some of Russ's method. Download a stock 11 5.3 file from the repository and see what he changed. For example, if he took 25% out of the 1-2 shift time, take 25% out of yours. The trans files are slightly different between the 5.3 and the 6.2, so don't just blindly paste his tables into your tune. I found it too harsh for my liking, but it was a fun experiment, and I did end up changing how I decreased my TM stuff because of it.
The 5.3's can handle more timing, so I stayed away from those tables.
You're also running a different OS. What, if any, impact that has I don't know. I haven't been able to see a 2012 6.2 file yet.
Brandon
Last edited by brandonleg; 07-20-2012 at 09:37 PM. Reason: clarity
2017 Sierra Denali 6.2
1986 K10 L86/8L90/NP205
Would the timing tables he posted be safe for an 09 6.0 L76 in a silverado?
russ
i tried your tune in my 2013 5.3 silverado.made a big difference.all the way through the gears.
your tune also help me to understand more on the correct way to tune.
I WANT TO THANK YOU.
would this tune dirrectly copy over to a 2009 z71 5.3 lc9 with 6 speed auto? when comparing files I have some ares in engine and trans tables that grey out
just curious as im starting a tune up on my silverado. here is a stock read.
I used Russ tune and not much KR.
Shawn 2013 GMC 5.3 Tune log.hpl
Is Russ's tune for 87 octane or 91/93?
Likely 91+.
Wouldnt be a bad idea to run atleast 89+.
2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.
If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.
With those timing and fuel tables run 93.
Reply With Quote