Car has been down for quite awhile sorting out valve train issues. previous tune was spot on pretty much across the board, from start up, thru warmup, and on down the road. After sorting out my valve train issues and installing new cam, I am not sure I believe what the scanner is telling me.
here is abit of back ground,
2004 Procharged GTO (m6) 403CI, AFR 235 heads (EDC custom)
Old cam: 224/232 .600/.600 114 lsa - Idle VE @ 30 KPA/ 800 RPM=47 VE@ 40 KPA 800RPM=52
New Cam: 229/240 .631/.610 117 LSA
Idle was non existent with new cam and old VE settings, idle nicely over 1000 RPM, scanner revealed very lean AFR, cranked in some additional VE got it to idle pretty smooth at approx 825 RPM. In order to achieve a 14.7-15.2 AFR at idle, my VE had to be cranked up to mid 70's which seems way out of whack???
I guess it is what it is, my question revolves around can the small cam size change make that big of difference? should I be looking at base running airflow or some other changes beside simply the primary VE table?
Now that I have achieved somewhat of an idle, I will run the Marcin's idle config and plug the numbers into the spread sheet and see what happens. have to wait for a cold start hopefully that will shed some light on the issue.
Any input is appreciated, I am tired of seeing my car on jack stands.....time to drive