Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 221

Thread: 2.24 teaser screenshot

  1. #121
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Close to my Z06
    Posts
    271
    Quote Originally Posted by Jtbrewer View Post
    I do agree with the updates. Hiring someone should have been about a year ago. You should finish the update then train the guy. Enough people are already waiting.


  2. #122
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    464

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by Billiumss View Post
    3-1-10

    3-1-2011 .......Hopefully months before then...

    BTW - Anymore love for the LS1 based PCMs in the future?
    2001 Camaro SS M6 - 23,xxx Miles

    Huron Speed AC Turbo AC Kit - 6.0L 9.4CR, LS3 Heads, 226 232 115 lsa cam, Turbonetics 7575 1.15 AR Turbo

    10.98 @ 133 MPH on 9 lbs boost

  3. #123
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    573
    keep up the good work HPT. things are moving along well.

  4. #124
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Hate to keep asking but Bill you guys have an astimation on ETA for 2.24?
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  5. #125
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    Hate to keep asking but Bill you guys have an astimation on ETA for 2.24?
    Hate to keep saying the same but no.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  6. #126
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Quote Originally Posted by Billiumss View Post
    Anymore love for the LS1 based PCMs in the future?
    We need more love in the form of tables in the editor
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  7. #127
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Billiumss View Post
    3-1-2011 .......Hopefully months before then...

    BTW - Anymore love for the LS1 based PCMs in the future?
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00 View Post
    We need more love in the form of tables in the editor
    While you may or may not notice it our head engineer has added several tables to several different LS1 operating systems, added 2 & 3 bar support for several, etc. so they haven't gone untouched. Unfortunately, however, there are close to 100 LS1 operating systems so updating each & everyone is a chore to put it lightly.

    -Bill
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  8. #128
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    I mean the 1 bar OS and some adjustments for the temperature compensation

    Do you have a list of tables added by chance? The only stuff I can think of off the top of my head are the ETC tables.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  9. #129
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    ETC, there were some new TCC tables added to the more popular segment swap os, I think there were fan tables added to all the os's in 2.23, 2 & 3 bar support for several 04+ os's that were requested.

    We won't be adding any further enhancements to our current custom operating systems though, sorry just no time to go through them.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  10. #130
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Yeah, so nothing that helps me lol jk

    Just wanted to make sure there was nothing cool I overlooked haha
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  11. #131
    Advanced Tuner jakebdb56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    646
    I did notice the 3 bar support for the '06 PCM , hopefully someday I'll need to utilize that enhancement lol
    '20 AT4
    '01 Suburban 2500 Dad Wagon

  12. #132
    awesome cant wait
    2002 WS6 M6

    fast toyz lid, descreened MAF, smooth air bellow, prc springs, Torquer V2, jet hot LTs, hooker ory, LM1 powerflo, ls7 clutch, 42 ford greenies, 3.73 Moser 12- Bolt.

  13. #133
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern FL
    Posts
    2,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill@HPTuners View Post
    Yeah we are currently in the process of hiring a new software engineer and plan on making our builds more automated so that new definitions & new invalid vin/os pairs can be added to a stable build more frequently with more ease...we tried doing this before when we added the build detail information but our customers hated how it was handled so we ditched that idea at which time alot of bugs were found in the beta software that we've be fixing ever since.

    With a new software engineer, though, it will actually open up alot of new opportunities to advance our product including autotune, CDV, etc that have all been held up due to the software bottleneck.

    Our software engineer has done it alone for the past 7 or so years and we reached a point where when you've got 8 people asking you for something at the same time its just not possible to get them all done and literally thats where we are at.

    -Bill
    Bill, you guys ever thought about just offering "definition" updates to the software instead of having to build it into a new version?
    Formerly known as RWTD

    Toys: '22 Tesla Model S Plaid / '20 Chevy Duramax / ?20 Sea-Doo RXT-X (2)

  14. #134
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Perth Western AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    303
    Quote Originally Posted by RWTD View Post
    Bill, you guys ever thought about just offering "definition" updates to the software instead of having to build it into a new version?
    It could be (and i am just guessing) that 2.22 isn't able to support some of the newer definition/operating systems that have been done for 2.23 & 2.24.

  15. #135
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Quote Originally Posted by RWTD View Post
    Bill, you guys ever thought about just offering "definition" updates to the software instead of having to build it into a new version?
    We did that, people complained so went back to the way we did it before.

    -Bill
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  16. #136
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Arron View Post
    It could be (and i am just guessing) that 2.22 isn't able to support some of the newer definition/operating systems that have been done for 2.23 & 2.24.
    We actually did new def & invalid vin/os support in 2.22 for about a month after the initial 2.22 release, people complained because the release date on their customer page didn't change so we went back to the way we did it before.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  17. #137
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill@HPTuners View Post
    We actually did new def & invalid vin/os support in 2.22 for about a month after the initial 2.22 release, people complained because the release date on their customer page didn't change so we went back to the way we did it before.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill@HPTuners View Post
    We did that, people complained so went back to the way we did it before.

    -Bill
    well thats rediculous... so the date didnt change lol... atleast you were giving constant updates to the software...

    i think i would have prefered this.

  18. #138
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    573
    btw, how is it coming along?

  19. #139
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    218
    We are getting close to 2 years without a public release.

  20. #140
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    232
    How goes it with the 3 additions to the LNF code? Fuel, Fan, and I foget the third, but the scanner issue also with it stopping at 255kpa?
    "I didn't fail, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong." - Benjamin Franklin