Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: why is stoich for gas vehicles slightly different in different os's??

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387

    why is stoich for gas vehicles slightly different in different os's??

    is it because of the o2 being used possibly being slightly different??
    or is GM trying to get a slightly richer/leaner than stoich so that they can play with fuel economy/power ever so slightly?
    is it that way because of pushing emmissions slightly one way or the other??

    why is stoich..not the same in every car??
    isnt stoich an exact calculation based on remaining oxygen or lack there of in teh exhaust gasses??

    I know the diferences arent huge..14.63 in one 14.68 in another..
    just trying to understand why GM does some things...LOL
    -Scott -

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    Not sure GM knows why GM does things lol
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  3. #3
    Señor Tuner MeentSS02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,132
    Mine was 14.63, but I changed it to 14.68 after I saw that my LC-1's setting for gasoline was 14.7:1.
    2008 Viper - now with HPToona - 1/4 Mile Shenanigans Here
    11.02 @ 130

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner xonelith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Whitby, Ontario, CANADA
    Posts
    408
    Mine's 14.7002. I was wondering this as well. I just assumed that this is the value, based on the narrowband, that it was trying to adjust to (hence wonky LTFT's and such). But I was told not to touch this to get rid of my rich condition (was going to increase it by a few tenths).

    So, who knows
    All Motor 2001 GA GT1




  5. #5
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    yeah I was asking as I want it to be true stoich..not a GM wanna be for whatever reason they did it...
    -Scott -

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Someplace high in the Himalayas
    Posts
    770
    Maybe it has to do with vehicle weight?
    www.outlawpontiacdragseries.com
    Come race with us in MA, PA, and VA!

    2005 GTO A4 - Spintech X-pipe with Powerstick mufflers, IAT relocate, Volant, !scoops, !cowlgasket, !skid plate, LM-1, HPT2.0/MPVI Pro USB, 275x40x17 Nitto DR, rolled fenders, Pedders 2985 springs, Britax baby seat with 5 point harness.
    Stock:13.36@104
    Mods in sig:[email protected]

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Posts
    477
    only thing I can think of is maybe depends where the vehicle was slated for? like midwest where most of the gas is 10% ethanol or other areas that don't use ethanol?

    I've noticed this but never looked into it... I wonder if there's just a difference between OS's? Meaning an early 99 would have one value, but the next OS update from GM would have a different value that they found works better over real world driving situations?
    Mike Horist
    00 WS6 (TA) | 04 WS6 (GTP Comp G)
    Mike \\#at&\\ horist \\&dot$\\com

    BOTH cars HP Tuners Tuned

  8. #8
    Señor Tuner MeentSS02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,132
    I'd like to know why I can type in 14.7 all day long, and it'll fill the square with 14.681 instead, or type in 14.71, and it'll fill the box with 14.73. Just can't get a 14.7 no way no how
    2008 Viper - now with HPToona - 1/4 Mile Shenanigans Here
    11.02 @ 130

  9. #9
    its the resolution of the PCM. PCM stores vaues with a limited decimal precision. When you hit save we round the value to the nearest acceptable value in the PCM.

    Chris...
    I count sheep in hex...

  10. #10
    Señor Tuner MeentSS02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,132
    What kinda resolution are we talkin here? I don't quite understand how values of 14.68 or 14.73 are acceptable to the PCM, whereas 14.70 is not
    2008 Viper - now with HPToona - 1/4 Mile Shenanigans Here
    11.02 @ 130

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    349
    A lot of values that the PCM derives are products of formula's...

    Like timing advance is (.5 * DataA) - 64

    So obviously there is a certain resolution there, like if you had 1 for DataA, then timing advance would come out to -63.5, and if DataA was 2, then timing advance would be -63, so there is no possible way to get -63.75...

    If that makes any sense...
    2.4L Twin Cam Cavalier Z24 | T3 Super 60 @ 9 PSI | FMIC | TurboXS RFL | Greddy Profec B Spec II | Custom HO Intake Manifold | 2.5" Charge Pipes | 2.5" Downpipe | HP Tuners | 5 Speed Swap | Team Green LSD | SPEC Stage 3 Clutch | Fidanza Short Shifter | Prothane Control Arm Bushings | Carbon Fiber Hood

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    349
    Btw, some values can only use integers, like DataA can be a whole number value between 0 and 255
    2.4L Twin Cam Cavalier Z24 | T3 Super 60 @ 9 PSI | FMIC | TurboXS RFL | Greddy Profec B Spec II | Custom HO Intake Manifold | 2.5" Charge Pipes | 2.5" Downpipe | HP Tuners | 5 Speed Swap | Team Green LSD | SPEC Stage 3 Clutch | Fidanza Short Shifter | Prothane Control Arm Bushings | Carbon Fiber Hood

  13. #13
    the PCM stores this on actually as Fuel/Air Ratio with a precision of 0.0002441 (ie. 1/4096)

    we display it as AFR for your convenience. The LS1 PCM can only store integer values, so you can see:

    a PCM value of 279 gives 4096/279 = 14.681 AFR

    and the next higher legal value

    280 gives 4096/280 = 14.6286 AFR

    and the next lower legal value:

    278 gives 4096/278 = 14.7338 AFR

    Hope that helps,

    Chris...
    I count sheep in hex...

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner xonelith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Whitby, Ontario, CANADA
    Posts
    408
    Actually, clears up some. Thanks Chris.

    So, what is affected if I increase the value? Will it change what the computer is trying to obtain as stoich?
    All Motor 2001 GA GT1




  15. #15
    this value is used by the fuel code to work out the base fuel mass required for a given amount of air. it has nothing to do with the O2 side of things.

    the PCM fuel calc works like this (high level):

    1. Calculate airmass (from MAF or VE)
    2. Calculate desired EQ ratio (from Openloop, PE, COT or 1.0)
    3. Convert EQ ratio to AFR (using the stoich value)
    4. Calculate Fuel Mass (Airmass / AFR)
    5. Calculate injector pulse width (Fuel Mass / Inj Flow Rate)

    From a units perspective its easy to follow:

    grams (air) / AFR = grams (fuel)

    then to get pulse width in seconds:

    grams (fuel) / (grams/sec) = sec

    Chris...
    I count sheep in hex...

  16. #16
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    my curiosity is more about teh stock computer looking for o2 volts that = approx.450mv..equaling lambada of 1.0(or perfect stoich)
    obviously this is all done in the o2 switchpoints tables...
    I'm just trying to understand where the value of stoich in our computers really comes into play and what changes when we change it to a different value...
    -Scott -

  17. #17
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@HPTuners
    this value is used by the fuel code to work out the base fuel mass required for a given amount of air. it has nothing to do with the O2 side of things.

    the PCM fuel calc works like this (high level):

    1. Calculate airmass (from MAF or VE)
    2. Calculate desired EQ ratio (from Openloop, PE, COT or 1.0)
    3. Convert EQ ratio to AFR (using the stoich value)
    4. Calculate Fuel Mass (Airmass / AFR)
    5. Calculate injector pulse width (Fuel Mass / Inj Flow Rate)

    From a units perspective its easy to follow:

    grams (air) / AFR = grams (fuel)

    then to get pulse width in seconds:

    grams (fuel) / (grams/sec) = sec

    Chris...
    so according to this..if we change the "stoich" value...lets say upwards..like my 00 camaro has a value of 14.62587
    If I up it to 14.68001(the next step up)
    and I change nothing else...
    then I will be making my injector pulse width will go down..leaning out my current mixture...
    so IF I did this then my whole VE table would need to go up to compensate?? correct?
    -Scott -

  18. #18
    yeah, its an attempt to make the fuel code independant of fuel type. Eg. those who have 2004+ cals will notice the Stoich value is a table that varies with alcohol %. The stoich value for alcohol being around 8.5:1
    I count sheep in hex...

  19. #19
    Señor Tuner MeentSS02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    1,132
    That makes a whole lotta sense. Thanks for all the clarification.
    2008 Viper - now with HPToona - 1/4 Mile Shenanigans Here
    11.02 @ 130

  20. #20
    Advanced Tuner xonelith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Whitby, Ontario, CANADA
    Posts
    408
    Thanks Chris. Very clear now.

    Curious, when reviewing LTFT's and STFT's, what is it trying to correct to? There must be some baseline. I had originally thought it was this stoichemetric value, but it appears not.

    Thanks !
    All Motor 2001 GA GT1