Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: How critical is a wideband when tuning?

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4

    Talking How critical is a wideband when tuning?

    Hello from TX

    I recently purchased a serial version of HPT, as that's what fit my budget at the moment. I have a 1999 Camaro SS A4 that I plan to use it for... although it's pretty much stock at the moment. I'm sure some improvements can be made to the stock tune though

    Anyhow, back on track- I plan to eventually upgrade to the pro version and purchase a Innovate LM1 or LM2 wideband. It seems like a wideband is a critical component of "proper" tuning. In the mean time, I'm curious as to how limited my tuning capabilities will be WITHOUT a wideband? What kind of stuff can I do without one (other than gear changes, TM deletion, etc)?

    I've got a lot to learn, but I enjoy this kind of stuff.. not to mention these forums appear to be a great resource with a lot of friendly people on them. I did purchase two books recently, so that should help me along the way. In addition, I can bring some assistance to the forums as I have experience in programming, scripting and Excel functions, etc - let me know if you need help or anything

    Thanks for any advice

  2. #2
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    9
    You cant really do any wot fueling changes without a wideband. Also the amount of spark advance you can run is directly related to your a/f's so a/f/s have to be done first.

    What you will be able to do without one is enable pe earlier, adjust trans settings, adjust for gear ratios, etc. I just personally wouldnt make any fuel changes without a good wideband.

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    665
    You can get your part throttle tuning dialed in some using fuel trims but without a wideband you are definately just going to be guessing as far as your wot tuning goes, which can be dangerous for your motor if you are going lean and dont realize it.
    2017 Silverado LTZ

  4. #4
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Also have to make sure your o2 sensors are relatively new and also good. Old/bad o2 sensors will give faulty data.

    Might want to think twice about deleting TM though, I have not seen too many people do that without having tranny issues soon after lol
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner eficalibrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    1,023
    Without a good wideband, you're just playing around. There are also a lot of other better choices than just the LM1/2 for affordable widebands.

  6. #6
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Quote Originally Posted by eficalibrator
    There are also a lot of other better choices than just the LM1/2 for affordable widebands.
    This is very true.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    665
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
    This is very true.
    Yes it is and definately do not buy an LC1! They are junk!!! Mine worked good for about 3 weeks
    2017 Silverado LTZ

  8. #8
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Ah yes, people think I am crazy for preaching against the LC1, if only more people would believe me lol
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  9. #9
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
    Also have to make sure your o2 sensors are relatively new and also good. Old/bad o2 sensors will give faulty data.

    Might want to think twice about deleting TM though, I have not seen too many people do that without having tranny issues soon after lol

    Interesting thought on the O2s... my car has really low mileage.. hopefully the stock ones are still good

    As for the TM, I wouldn't completely delete it


    Thanks though everyone, looks like I'll be getting a wideband ASAP!

    eficalibrator - You have a PM!

  10. #10
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
    Ah yes, people think I am crazy for preaching against the LC1, if only more people would believe me lol
    Between my friends and I, we have 13 LC-1's installed. No issues to date (some installed for over 2 years, some only 2 months). Are we to be considered a lucky 13?
    2022 Chevrolet Silverado RST 5.3L

  11. #11
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    I think so
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    665
    Yeah me too!!!!
    2017 Silverado LTZ

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Alphretta,GA(USA)
    Posts
    15
    Hey! Peeps

    IN10SE i have a 02 trans am A4.It is a stock motor with high flow air lid, K&N air filter,SLP maf , SLP cold air kit and gutted cats. I took it to the track about to weeks ago and ran 12.95 at 107.7 in the 1/4. I tuned it myself with the help of the people on this form.Thank you everyone . I have the LC1 also and i'm taking it out and buying me the LM2 because it is portable.I don't need to look at my AF all the time ,plus the sensor last longer this way.

    P.S. bone stock i ran 13.6

  14. #14
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Burlington, VT
    Posts
    33
    If your wideband is off, you can cook your motor by running open loop SD. Make sure your wideband is accurate before relying on it.

    I'd stay away from PLX devices. The one I got is off by quite a bit and the company won't respond to my emails.

  15. #15
    Супер Модератор EC_Tune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Almost 2000 feet.
    Posts
    7,876
    Quote Originally Posted by destey
    If your wideband is off, you can cook your motor by running open loop SD. Make sure your wideband is accurate before relying on it.

    I'd stay away from PLX devices. The one I got is off by quite a bit and the company won't respond to my emails.
    I will agree with you about them being off. They responded to my emails but I decided to just get a new wideband (dynojet) instead of repairing my PLX.
    Always Support Our Troops!

  16. #16
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,742
    I've noticed quite a few LC1 and LM1's off. When you read the LSU4.x datasheets its really not that bad of an idea to just rely on the calibration resistor. I'm not sure why innovative insist not to do this.
    Tuner at PCMofnc.com
    Email tuning!!!, Mail order, Dyno tuning, Performance Parts, Electric Fan Kits, 4l80e swap harnesses, 6l80 -> 4l80e conversion harnesses, Installs

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Burlington, VT
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Alvin
    I've noticed quite a few LC1 and LM1's off. When you read the LSU4.x datasheets its really not that bad of an idea to just rely on the calibration resistor. I'm not sure why innovative insist not to do this.
    Calibration resistor? Care to educate a dummy?

  18. #18
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15
    My LC-1 never calibrated correctly from day 1, but I almost think that was a ground problem. It read accurately though (not sure how) if I cycled the power during a calibration. Finally it bit the dust when I switched to e85. 2 years of daily abuse, it looks like just the sensor. I picked one up from germanautoparts.com so we'll see how that works.

  19. #19
    Tuner in Training 346ci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by eficalibrator
    Without a good wideband, you're just playing around. There are also a lot of other better choices than just the LM1/2 for affordable widebands.
    Which widebands would you recommend?

  20. #20
    Senior Tuner eficalibrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    1,023
    As a professional engine calibrator, I use professional equipment. (Much the same way really good mechanics prefer Snap-On/MAC/Cornwell tools) My "normal" wideband is an ECM LambdaPRO. I easily admit that this is a bit of overkill (and overspending) for the casual tuner, but I'm a bit more than just an enthusiast who's playing around with his car for fun. The whole ECM line is basically the standard of the industry for professionals. Any good professional tuner should take a look at their line before deciding to rely upon some el-cheapo mass market crap.

    If you're on a tighter budget, the NGK AFX is actually made by ECM and resold under the NGK name. It has a limited output range, but still very sufficient for casual tuning work. The electronics running the controller are based off the same architecture that runs their more expensive meters.