My AFR values on the scanner are off by 0.5 compare to the gauge (~14.4 on the gauge and ~14.8/14.9 on the scanner). Any way to scale it on VCM scanner so they match?
My AFR values on the scanner are off by 0.5 compare to the gauge (~14.4 on the gauge and ~14.8/14.9 on the scanner). Any way to scale it on VCM scanner so they match?
2012 CTS-V BDT, Auto, Every Option | Lingefelter 2.55" UP | DW65 Injectors | C&R HX | Pierburg CWA100 | 90mm TB | Airaid CF Intake with Green Filter | Lingefelter 160deg T-Stat | 534whp/503tq
2002 C5 Z06 Quick Silver, AR Headers, Borla Axle Back, A&A Kit
See if this helps:
the other issues I am having now is that AFRs in HPtuners is scanning much faster than the gauge. Is there a way to slow the raster down a bit so the gauge and HPtuners match in scanning speed? I have a hard time keeping an eye on the one on hptuners due to the very fast movement, where as the gauge it is much easier.
2012 CTS-V BDT, Auto, Every Option | Lingefelter 2.55" UP | DW65 Injectors | C&R HX | Pierburg CWA100 | 90mm TB | Airaid CF Intake with Green Filter | Lingefelter 160deg T-Stat | 534whp/503tq
2002 C5 Z06 Quick Silver, AR Headers, Borla Axle Back, A&A Kit
2012 CTS-V BDT, Auto, Every Option | Lingefelter 2.55" UP | DW65 Injectors | C&R HX | Pierburg CWA100 | 90mm TB | Airaid CF Intake with Green Filter | Lingefelter 160deg T-Stat | 534whp/503tq
2002 C5 Z06 Quick Silver, AR Headers, Borla Axle Back, A&A Kit
Same issue on my 30-4110 - using the exact formulas for 30-4110 in the VCM scanner and the scanner reads .6-.7 AFR leaner than the what the gauge is reading - no difference if at idle or in PE enrichment. I've grounded them to the same source rather than the MPVI2 pro through the OBD port and no difference.
Should I adjust the scanner formula, so it reflects what the gauge is reading or do we think the gauge is reading richer than it actually is? Being boosted I don't want to be reading artificially rich in the scanner when logging.