Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 2013 TT coyote tunning

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training twotons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    15

    2013 TT coyote tunning

    new to this tunning on the ford coyote mustang, have fuel injector info, car runs and drives on the dyno, cant figure out enrichment under low load and heavy load, timing tables seem to be doing what i have commanded but cant get it to fuel,

    help would be greatly appreciated

    thanks in advance
    Brian@RPE Performance
    (509)280-8466

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    872
    Could you post the tune and a datalog?

    If you are having issues with how quick it adds fuel you should increase the "Fuel Enrichment Rate", stock it's .050, increase this to .100 and maybe even more if needed
    Last edited by Jn2; 12-23-2016 at 04:48 PM.

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner bbrooks98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Gainesville, VA
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by Jn2 View Post
    Could you post the tune and a datalog?

    If you are having issues with how quick it adds fuel you should increase the "Fuel Enrichment Rate", stock it's .50, increase this to .100 and maybe even more if needed
    I usually use 1.0 and is probably what you meant?

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    872
    Quote Originally Posted by bbrooks98 View Post
    I usually use 1.0 and is probably what you meant?
    My bad, forgot a zero, stock is .050 lambda/second, increasing it to .100 lambda/second should speed up the fueling, could also try .200 lamnda/second as well.

  5. #5
    Tuner in Training twotons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    15
    Brian@RPE Performance
    (509)280-8466

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    872
    Some things I'm seeing are(there might be more, but your log only shows a quick hit of the throttle that lasts like 3 seconds)

    - MAF doesn't seems to be dialed in, you are +8 before you go WOT and +15 when you finally achieve commanded lambda. During low loads you are anywhere between -16 to -25 at times...
    - You aren't logging nearly enough PIDs(add Spark Source, Fuel Source, VCT Source, Torque Source, IPC Wheel Torque Error, Driver Demand Limit Source)

    Suggestion for now:

    - Engine>Fuel>OL & CL > Fuel enrichment rate = .200/second (which is less than your .900 you have now, but still 4x faster than stock)
    - Engine>Airflow>General>Airflow vs. Voltage = Set this back to stock values and leave them alone
    - Engine>Airflow>General> MAF Airflow vs MAF Period <<<MAF period is what you adjust to calibrate the MAF
    - Engine>Airflow>Variable Camshaft>OP Enrichichment Req = Disable (disable this, it was the reason my car would stay stuck at lambda 1 during WOT until 6,000rpm, was really annoying)

    Drive the car while dataloging MAF period vs STFT(since you have LTFT disabled) in order to populate the necessary value for you to calibrate the MAF. Don't try any more WOT pulls until that MAF is dialed in.


    MAF period for your historgram(just copy and paste it like it shows up on my pic)
    83.3 101 107 114 119.8 123 128 132 136 139 143.5 150 160.5 173 178 183.5 188 193 200 207 210 215.5 220 226 242 259 275 290 320 330 360 410 450 500 540 590 605 635 650 1485

    Here is the Math I used for STFT, go ahead and create this one for yourself using the same set up I have below:
    Screen Shot 2016-12-28 at 6.17.38 PM.png

    Here is the histogram you will create using the Math PID you just created. Copy and paste the MAF period values I posted a bit higher up on the last row where I have it one mine.
    Screen Shot 2016-12-28 at 6.17.24 PM.png


    Once you have those things set up you can start doing some driving around, varying RPMs and throttle, avoid OP/WOT, you want to populate the histogram as much as possible with as many hits/cell as possible. I usually just do a long 30 minute continuous drive through streets and highway. Once you have it populated, copy them and special paste them into the MAF period. There is more details on this over on the MAF thread

    http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...ay-to-tune-MAF
    Last edited by Jn2; 12-28-2016 at 06:45 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Hawaii
    Posts
    2,101
    For the math you can use more than just one STFT variable. I don't really see the point in using math feature other wise
    You can add both banks together put that in brackets and divide by two to get the average of your STFT. There's a few premade maths for both fuel trims and lambda error you can check out. All you have to do is make sure the variables in the formulas where in your scanner and you can use them in your charts and graphs.

    Another great feature is the filter for the histograms. Say you only want to see data for above a certain load or around a certain lambda reading, you can use greater than or less than symbols and boolean logic against the variables to target the zone of a certain table you are trying to tune as well as eliminate some of the extra data skewing your averages.

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner SultanHassanMasTuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    All Around
    Posts
    3,149
    torque and inverse
    Follow @MASTUNING visit www.mastuned.com
    Remote Tuning [email protected]
    Contact/Whatsapp +966555366161

  9. #9
    Tuner in Training twotons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Jn2 View Post
    Some things I'm seeing are(there might be more, but your log only shows a quick hit of the throttle that lasts like 3 seconds)

    - MAF doesn't seems to be dialed in, you are +8 before you go WOT and +15 when you finally achieve commanded lambda. During low loads you are anywhere between -16 to -25 at times...
    - You aren't logging nearly enough PIDs(add Spark Source, Fuel Source, VCT Source, Torque Source, IPC Wheel Torque Error, Driver Demand Limit Source)

    Suggestion for now:

    - Engine>Fuel>OL & CL > Fuel enrichment rate = .200/second (which is less than your .900 you have now, but still 4x faster than stock)
    - Engine>Airflow>General>Airflow vs. Voltage = Set this back to stock values and leave them alone
    - Engine>Airflow>General> MAF Airflow vs MAF Period <<<MAF period is what you adjust to calibrate the MAF
    - Engine>Airflow>Variable Camshaft>OP Enrichichment Req = Disable (disable this, it was the reason my car would stay stuck at lambda 1 during WOT until 6,000rpm, was really annoying)

    Drive the car while dataloging MAF period vs STFT(since you have LTFT disabled) in order to populate the necessary value for you to calibrate the MAF. Don't try any more WOT pulls until that MAF is dialed in.


    MAF period for your historgram(just copy and paste it like it shows up on my pic)
    83.3 101 107 114 119.8 123 128 132 136 139 143.5 150 160.5 173 178 183.5 188 193 200 207 210 215.5 220 226 242 259 275 290 320 330 360 410 450 500 540 590 605 635 650 1485

    Here is the Math I used for STFT, go ahead and create this one for yourself using the same set up I have below:
    Screen Shot 2016-12-28 at 6.17.38 PM.png

    Here is the histogram you will create using the Math PID you just created. Copy and paste the MAF period values I posted a bit higher up on the last row where I have it one mine.
    Screen Shot 2016-12-28 at 6.17.24 PM.png


    Once you have those things set up you can start doing some driving around, varying RPMs and throttle, avoid OP/WOT, you want to populate the histogram as much as possible with as many hits/cell as possible. I usually just do a long 30 minute continuous drive through streets and highway. Once you have it populated, copy them and special paste them into the MAF period. There is more details on this over on the MAF thread

    http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...ay-to-tune-MAF
    2013 Coyote twin turbo.hpl

    here is the last datalog, i entered the wrong one
    Brian@RPE Performance
    (509)280-8466

  10. #10
    Im chasing one with this as well...commanding .70 lambda, ecu shows a pretty steady .75 pulling a good bit of stft (tried to skew the maf to add fuel) commanded equivalency is nowhere near commanded in the wot lambda tables. and im showing 11.5 at first hit of boost, tapering up to 12.5 on my wideband.

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner 15PSI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    East Coast Somewhere
    Posts
    458
    UMSTuning, Can you please provide a datalog?
    2012 Mustang GT with S/C
    4Runner with S/C
    Turbo/NOS Hayabusa - 320RWHP

  12. #12
    ums tuning what boost and fuel are you running

  13. #13
    14psi, racegas

  14. #14
    Senior Tuner SultanHassanMasTuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    All Around
    Posts
    3,149
    you need to work on your torque model and rescale it torque and inverse

    rescale your MBT tables
    Follow @MASTUNING visit www.mastuned.com
    Remote Tuning [email protected]
    Contact/Whatsapp +966555366161