I'm looking at a tune from a gen 3 with a 3 bar SD OS and noticed that it still has a MAF table. Why? Does the MAF table do anything?
I'm looking at a tune from a gen 3 with a 3 bar SD OS and noticed that it still has a MAF table. Why? Does the MAF table do anything?
You can still use the MAF.
DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
http://www.dsxtuning.com
http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
Just say no to bull s***.
IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!
Some ignore it and some don't. Only way to really know is try
I've used the MAF on a 3 bar OS in a 2004 GTO.
DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
http://www.dsxtuning.com
http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
Just say no to bull s***.
IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!
Ive used the MAF on my 2bar OS from my 02 WS6 411 computer
Email Tunes, [email protected]
96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
14 Gen 5 Viper
Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C
Seems like some of the earlier OS's ignored it no matter what. My 2000 Camaro was one of them. I've never had a car to use both on a gen3 though cause most go SD to get away from the frequency limitations of the Gen3 PCM's.
James Short - [email protected]
Located in Central Kentucky
ShorTuning
2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400
From what our head engineer has said in the past the maf was basically taken out of the picture in the earlier LS1 operating systems that have the secondary VE table in stock form, so you might be able to use the maf in some of the newer operating systems the older ones the functionality needed to be removed.
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Good info Bill and backs up what I have seen/experimented with in the field.
Thanks
James Short - [email protected]
Located in Central Kentucky
ShorTuning
2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400
I would assume so as the earlier vortec's shared the same OSID as most of the F Cars.
James Short - [email protected]
Located in Central Kentucky
ShorTuning
2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400
I don't want to get into a MAF vs. SD debate, but what makes you want to use the MAF with the custom SD OS?
I usually get everything I need out of the SD. Pretty little variance in AFR even in ambient temperature changes.
Double the resolution if you can keep the MAF. Cover your right eye up with an eye patch and you can still drive to the grocery store but you can see much better with both eyes correct? Similar with the PCM, if you have more data/sources to predict/calculate airflow it will be more accurate and seamless. I'm not saying SD is bad I'm just saying when properly done it'll never be as good as a blended setup. The blended setup has everything a full SD tune has (because it still utilizes it) and everything a MAF tune has.
James Short - [email protected]
Located in Central Kentucky
ShorTuning
2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400