Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Maf vs Sd

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner colamotas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    277

    Maf vs Sd

    Why would you not want to ever use the Maf agin after you tune your car? Is thier some kind of performance gain?

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    347
    If the MAF is tuned right there is no performance gain for SD....

    SD uses the VE table so there is more resolution, I havent tuned an N/A setup yet that was more than the MAF couldnt handle, but sometimes on more radical head/cam or FI setups you max out the MAF so SD is necessary.
    Last edited by chrisj6; 12-23-2006 at 10:47 PM.
    2009 Silverado Crew Cab 5.3L, stock.

  3. #3
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Use the search, this has been asked hundreds of times...

    It is all over this board and LS1tech
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB