Originally Posted by
06300CSRT8
what difference are you seeing? Without being able to extract to .csv yet in 2.25 its tough for me to compare the capture rate versus diablo but from the screen view of each datalogger I have noticed HP to be a little faster capture rate, all thing equal (same laptop, same # of PIDs selected).
If you connect to the vehicle and then on the left side click to add a PID you can see the full list, but not necessarily know if its supported or not (i.e. that it will actually record any data).