Not to get too far off topic, how was the before/after of the CTS-V aka my dream car lol
Not to get too far off topic, how was the before/after of the CTS-V aka my dream car lol
'20 AT4
'01 Suburban 2500 Dad Wagon
RIP - '98 LS1 Vette!
E-MAIL - [email protected] Cell 661-406-7516
Bolt on Mods with an A4 and 3:15's:---------322RWHP and 327RWTQ
TFS Head,Cam,Kooks LT's,Hi-FlowCats,X-Pipe:400RWHP and 400RWTQ
New Cam Yank 3200 Stall, 3.42's-------------423RWHP and 399RWTQ
ProCharger P1SC 3.85" Pulley 7.6 PSI Boost:565RWHP and 483RWTQ
Meth Injection2BAR SDTune(Est720 HP@Crank):591RWHP and 496RWTQ
Forged 347 3.7" Pulley FlipDrive, 14.4 PSI of B@@ST 701RWHP and 582RWTQ
2018 Infiniti Q60s
2004 350z/LS2: ERL 434ci, 11.8:1,TFS245cc,262/266@113+3,Fast102,NX 102 plate,60#injectors/return w/twin 255s
Old setup: CNC'd317s, Fast 102, 228/228@114, PT88,83#injectors/full return system. 10.84@138
email support
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Our current hardware is virtually futureproof in regards to adding new vehicle support, what isn't futureproof about it are parts(one of the parts is no longer produced so we bought up what stock we could) and changing times(for instance E38/E67 datalogging frames per second), we've already got a good idea of what we want to do with the next hardware revision but we also want to keep the same price as we don't want to price ourselves out of the market.
-Bill
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Is there a limitation on the existing hardware in regards to datalogging FPS? If so, would there be an upgrade available like the transition from serial to USB interface?
Currently the MPVI pro has limited memory for standalone datalogging, for isntance on LS1's or my grand prix gtp for example I can datalog for up to an hour and a half covering what could normally be a trip to and from work or to the track, several runs at the track and then the trip home, however on the newer pcm's that spit out some 40 frames per second this eats up memory on the interface meaning on those applications you max out at roughly 20-30 minutes of standalone datalogging time, so our next redesign will either incorporate a larger memory chip or sd card, etc but thats TBD at this point.
Right now we are just in the planning stages as its not an incredibly high priority to replace our existing hardware.
-Bill
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Thank you for that answer Bill. I've definitely noticed that in some instances, I'm out of memory fairly quickly. But I rarely ever log with just the interface as my laptop is almost always where the interface is.
I think the SD card would be a great idea since you can leave the interface hooked up to the car/wideband and manipulate the data later.
So when is this going to be released? Its been forever now...
2.24 will be released when it's released and that's that, the beta versions have been working pretty well and getting more stable so everybody just shut up about it
2017 Silverado LTZ
I don't know how they deal with the same questions asked over and over and over.
It will be released when it is released!!
I'm pretty happy with 2.23. Next weekend my Dad is coming out with his 2010 challenger and I'm going to see if I can at least scan it and read the computer.
2000 T/A - Thompson Motorsports 416ls3, F1A procharger, HP tuned. Just a couple psi of boost.
2013 Mercedes C350, wish HPtuners worked.
Is the 2.24 going to be much different from the 2.23?
2018 Infiniti Q60s
2004 350z/LS2: ERL 434ci, 11.8:1,TFS245cc,262/266@113+3,Fast102,NX 102 plate,60#injectors/return w/twin 255s
Old setup: CNC'd317s, Fast 102, 228/228@114, PT88,83#injectors/full return system. 10.84@138