Page 13 of 23 FirstFirst ... 391011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 446

Thread: Injection Timing Assistance Requested

  1. #241
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    SV, AZ
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by jsllc View Post
    It does take less time but more in crank degrees because there is less time between degrees of crank rotation. Attachment 66806
    Are you just leaving the same time in there with the thought that it will all wash out in the end? What is the 24.5ms time based on?

  2. #242
    Advanced Tuner Niemer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    371
    Using this spreadsheet and the info in here changed my trims from +/-3% to less than +/-1%, pretty crazy.
    Ported TVS1900 OD cogs 10.5psi | ID850 | Vaporworx CTS-V 1:1 | COMP 219/233 .606"/.605" 113+1 | Ported TB | Pacesetter 1 3/4 LT | Solo Mach X3


  3. #243
    Advanced Tuner IARLLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    943
    I realize that adjusting injector timing is much more important when using an aftermarket cam but we do like to give our clients the best possible service. With this in mind, where do you find factory cam specs? Does GM publish them?

  4. #244
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,982
    Quote Originally Posted by IARLLC View Post
    I realize that adjusting injector timing is much more important when using an aftermarket cam but we do like to give our clients the best possible service. With this in mind, where do you find factory cam specs? Does GM publish them?
    i have seen stock LS cam specs somewhere they are in a list but is all .050 im not sure on the .006 specs

  5. #245
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    758
    Just read this whole thread and my head hurts. LOL
    2007 Corvette C6 Vert. A6
    LME LS402, Pat G custom cam, ATI 10% OD Damper
    Circle D triple disc 2600, 3.42 Diff
    YSI, 3.0 pulley, ID 1000's
    Alky Control Meth,
    ARH 1 7/8 headers,
    1009 RWHP @ 7000, 817 RWT @ 6000

  6. #246
    Quote Originally Posted by jsllc View Post
    It does take less time but more in crank degrees because there is less time between degrees of crank rotation.


    Attachment 66806
    This looks really familiar.

  7. #247
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    566
    General question.....

    Do you guys find it a better practice to zero out the normal rpm and/or normal ETC and focus primarily on boundary changes? Or, do you use all tables? I've been playing with the spreadsheet and the combinations of different iterations to hit targets is kinda mind numbing.
    When arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing....

  8. #248
    Since the end result is based on a linear equation, it doesn't really matter.

    However,
    - since we can't be 100% sure that the boundary is not related to any other function, I'd make as minimal changes as needed in there
    - ECT is intended for taking care of the warmup and other non-std ECT situations, so I'd make changes in there only if something can be directly identified to be temperature related

    Conclusion would be to use the RPM table for most of the needs and then change boundary only as much as is needed in the areas where you run out of adjustment range.

  9. #249
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by realcanuk View Post
    Just read this whole thread and my head hurts. LOL
    Me and you both

    I posted one of the original sheets that got it started and my head still hurts... it got taken a bit further than I've ever seen (or heard of) before

  10. #250
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by GHuggins View Post
    Best and most straight forward advice I can give - aim to keep ppv right in the middle of eoi and soi except for high rpms where you will keep eoi after fuel to port time is included at around 15 to 20 degrees before ivc... Especially where your running a PD blower The eoi is about 15 to 20 hp sensitive - you can loose that much with it being off that little and then more if it's off more...
    I just spent like an hour going through this thing. Really wish I had my cam specs @ 0.006 but only have them at 0.050. I used those for now

    Basically I've got it to where PPV is right in the middle between SOIT-FRC and EOIT-FRC for 0 to 2048 RPM's. For mine that works out to SOIT-FRC always being after Exhaust valve is closed.

    Then for 3072 and up I'm targeting EOIT-FRC to be 20-25 degrees before IVC.

    For 2560 to 3584 it's somewhere between what you said to do for low RPM's vs. high RPM's. A transition if you will

    Am I reading it right? I've removed a few lines but here is what I have right now. I got rid of the actual SOIT and EOIT and left the "FRC" versions since I'd think those are more important.

    Capture.JPG

    ------

    The "graphs" tab is really the best one for me visually. Once I understood those fully the graph in the "table" tab started making more sense. There is a LOT of info on that one.
    Last edited by schpenxel; 05-08-2017 at 02:31 PM.

  11. #251
    Tuning Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Franklin, NC / Gainesville, Ga
    Posts
    6,802
    Maybe don't fully retard it until 5600 and then flatline the boundary there - otherwise see how it does
    2010 Vette Stock Bottom LS3 - LS2 APS Twin Turbo Kit, Trick Flow Heads and Custom Cam - 12psi - 714rwhp and 820rwtq / 100hp Nitrous Shot starting at 3000 rpms - 948rwhp and 1044rwtq still on 93
    2011 Vette Cam Only Internal Mod in stock LS3 -- YSI @ 18psi - 811rwhp on 93 / 926rwhp on E60 & 1008rwhp with a 50 shot of nitrous all through a 6L80

    ~Greg Huggins~
    Remote Tuning Available at gh[email protected]
    Mobile Tuning Available for North Georgia and WNC

  12. #252
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Will do, gotta finish putting exhaust on first. It's shaking the ground at the moment without any mufflers

  13. #253
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    222
    Same here... not sure who came up with the original graph, but the final (?) version turned out great. I tend to look at the graphs (the black ones), then back to the tables for slight tweaks. I'm not totally convinced that the FRC stuff is critically important, but the logic is sound.

  14. #254
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    I'm claiming responsibility for the original graph

    But that's about it

    I've messed with the sheet some more and I really like it

  15. #255
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    SV, AZ
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by scottt28 View Post
    Same here... not sure who came up with the original graph, but the final (?) version turned out great. I tend to look at the graphs (the black ones), then back to the tables for slight tweaks. I'm not totally convinced that the FRC stuff is critically important, but the logic is sound.
    I'd be curious as to how much time it's actually taking for the FRC and also if maybe it's somehow accounted already in the OE tables.

  16. #256
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by barum View Post
    Since the end result is based on a linear equation, it doesn't really matter.

    However,
    - since we can't be 100% sure that the boundary is not related to any other function, I'd make as minimal changes as needed in there
    - ECT is intended for taking care of the warmup and other non-std ECT situations, so I'd make changes in there only if something can be directly identified to be temperature related

    Conclusion would be to use the RPM table for most of the needs and then change boundary only as much as is needed in the areas where you run out of adjustment range.
    Thanks. Your input makes sense to me. Any idea why the RPM table stops at around 4900 rpm?
    When arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing....

  17. #257
    Tuning Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Franklin, NC / Gainesville, Ga
    Posts
    6,802
    Use boundary and ect - leave the rpm table zeroed... The injection timing your already running should be really close to what you need even with the new cam Michael...
    2010 Vette Stock Bottom LS3 - LS2 APS Twin Turbo Kit, Trick Flow Heads and Custom Cam - 12psi - 714rwhp and 820rwtq / 100hp Nitrous Shot starting at 3000 rpms - 948rwhp and 1044rwtq still on 93
    2011 Vette Cam Only Internal Mod in stock LS3 -- YSI @ 18psi - 811rwhp on 93 / 926rwhp on E60 & 1008rwhp with a 50 shot of nitrous all through a 6L80

    ~Greg Huggins~
    Remote Tuning Available at gh[email protected]
    Mobile Tuning Available for North Georgia and WNC

  18. #258
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    566
    I actually changed the tables from last year a bit for the new cam and smaller injectors. I just HAD to use this super-cool spreadsheet!! Had to guess on the injector pulse widths, seeing how I hadn't logged any runs yet.

  19. #259
    Senior Tuner mowton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,773
    Quote Originally Posted by GHuggins View Post
    Best and most straight forward advice I can give - aim to keep ppv right in the middle of eoi and soi except for high rpms where you will keep eoi after fuel to port time is included at around 15 to 20 degrees before ivc... Especially where your running a PD blower The eoi is about 15 to 20 hp sensitive - you can loose that much with it being off that little and then more if it's off more...
    I also try and place the idle injection timing right around the PPV (thanks Greg :-)) and after the Exhaust valve closes to compensate for inefficiencies as a result of not injecting against a closed, hot intake valve in large overlap cam setups. I believe it optimizes the fuel/air mixing and minimize cylinder wash.

    Ed M
    2004 Vette Coupe, LS2, MN6, Vararam, ARH/CATs, Ti's, 4:10, Trickflow 215, 30# SVO, Vette Doctors Cam, Fast 90/90, DD McLeod, DTE Brace, Hurst shifter, Bilsteins etc. 480/430

    ERM Performance Tuning -- Interactive Learning ..from tuning software training to custom tunes
    HP Tuners Dealer- VCM Suite (free 2hr training session with purchase), credits and new Version 2.0 turtorial available
    http://www.ermperformancetuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/ERMPerformanceTuning

    [email protected]

  20. #260
    Advanced Tuner jsllc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by Eaglegoat View Post
    Are you just leaving the same time in there with the thought that it will all wash out in the end? What is the 24.5ms time based on?
    Calc is based on the time to travel a certain distance (injector to chamber). In the case of most LS applications the injector is placed in the same location ie same distance.
    Last edited by jsllc; 05-11-2017 at 10:54 AM.