In case you still don't like 3.2...

[DSteck]

https://youtu.be/VW1zAmiyc30

HPT was kind enough to add some scanning parameters for my GM FPCM replacement. As long as you follow the CAN requirements, they can likely add whatever custom stuff you build as well. The other huge thing is they may even support reading/writing the calibration data from my hardware which means people will be able to edit the pump performance to their liking.

3.2 offers so much more than 2.24, and while there's a hurdle and a few bugs to deal with... It is totally worth it. I look forward (or is it "foward" Keith?) to developing more while using HPT to do so. Their scanning ability is what allows me to easily watch pump reactions and calibrate the feed forward response!

[mowton]

https://youtu.be/VW1zAmiyc30

HPT was kind enough to add some scanning parameters for my GM FPCM replacement. As long as you follow the CAN requirements, they can likely add whatever custom stuff you build as well. The other huge thing is they may even support reading/writing the calibration data from my hardware which means people will be able to edit the pump performance to their liking.

3.2 offers so much more than 2.24, and while there's a hurdle and a few bugs to deal with... It is totally worth it. I look forward (or is it "foward" Keith?) to developing more while using HPT to do so. Their scanning ability is what allows me to easily watch pump reactions and calibrate the feed forward response!

Pretty neat Dave. Can always rely on you to be the first to push the envelope :-) Does that mean we no longer have to replace the FPCM under certain conditions with an ADM Performance unit?

Thanks for sharing,

Ed M

[DSteck]

Mine will run whatever people want. It'll be more expensive, but then again it isn't just a ZL1 FPCM.

[mowton]

.....and you don't have to remove the rear seat like in an Chevy SS :-)

Ed M