Did anyone come up with an effective way of filtering out transient fueling when scanning
for VE and MAF calibrations. I'm going to continue to use 2.24 until the new scanner is
out of beta testing, so I'm asking this for the 2.24 version of the scanner.
Like everyone else who does not own a dyno, I'm tuning based on driving on the street,
and need to filter out transient fueling. The last time I checked, over a year ago, the
dy/dt filtering feature of the scanner was not working correctly.
Most of the posts I read dealt with customers wishing to measure lambda error ONLY when
TPS% was not changing beyond a certain threshold or rate over time to exclude transient
behavior for the computation of lambda error correct factors to apply to MAF and VE
tables.
Would those familiar with the more recent improvements please update me on what
approach turned out to be the best?
Thank you very much for your help! Jim Linder NW AR