Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ups and Down sides of removing TQ Management

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    464

    Question Ups and Down sides of removing TQ Management

    You always hear that you want to either remove or reduce your TQ Man so the PCM won't pull timing during shifts. By doing so, you have more consistant power during your 1/4 mile run.

    I've read something recently about if you remove it completely or remove to much, that you can have shift problems, as in not shifting when you tell it to in the PCM.

    For example, for the average A4 car, you have heads, cam, 3200 stall, 3.42 or 3.73 gear, what would you guys recommend?

    In the past I usually cut it by 50% and haven't had any noticeable problems but I have to work out some shift issues with a 383 A4 Camaro that I tuned before, doesn't seem to want to shift when I tell it to.

    What do you guys remove?

    Bill
    2001 Camaro SS M6 - 23,xxx Miles

    Huron Speed AC Turbo AC Kit - 6.0L 9.4CR, LS3 Heads, 226 232 115 lsa cam, Turbonetics 7575 1.15 AR Turbo

    10.98 @ 133 MPH on 9 lbs boost

  2. #2
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Qld Australia
    Posts
    166

    TQ removed

    I have a stock A4 2004 Commoodre tuned mafless with 2500 stall and 3.91 gears. I removed all TQ reduction. The only issue I have had with shifts was when I didn't match the commanded shift tables for rpm and mph. I would hit the rev limiter. No problems since.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    You could blow the trans either way.

    I once tuned on a performance truck and thought it might
    help him, to apply some torque limiting through the shifts.

    Thing is, un-limited he used to spin all four tires straight
    across the 1-2. Once I cut torque, the tires got to stick,
    give more back-torque after the torque-cut went away
    and this shortly bent the sprag right over; he was better
    off un-"managed".

    I have run it all killed, all stock and "softly managed" and
    never run into a trans shifting problem -except- the time
    I tried to mess arounf the profile of torque reduction vs
    torque to attempt a constant-torque profile; then I got
    some situations where, at high part throttle, it would hang
    and not shift out until pedal release - mostly about throttle
    "flutter" events in street driving. So I now leave that table
    with its stockish profile (other than applying the 2-3 line
    to the 3-4 as well) and work on the spark end, reducing
    the amount taken out.

    I expect there is some mysterious stuff goes on and needs
    to be avoided, haven't seen any deep explanation for the
    stuff I encountered, had to back out of that one on my
    own.

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    464
    So basically just cut the TM tables by say 50% and all should be good.

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    Quote Originally Posted by Billiumss
    So basically just cut the TM tables by say 50% and all should be good.
    it varies per vehicle per mods per driver preferance...
    but removing TQ management can put a lot of wear and tear on the tranny...

    so just be cautious about how much you do remove
    -Scott -