Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: 2011 CTS-V Pulley Tune

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2

    2011 CTS-V Pulley Tune

    Hi all, I was hoping someone could help me or provide a tune that will be a good starting point after installing a 2.55" supercharger pulley? I consider myself pretty handy with natrally asperated LS engines, but no experience with supercharged. Thanks!

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner SultanHassanMasTuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    All Around
    Posts
    3,149
    you will need injectors for starters
    Follow @MASTUNING visit www.mastuned.com
    Remote Tuning [email protected]
    Contact/Whatsapp +966555366161

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210
    heres a tune file, 11.5 afr and 16ish degrees of timing, ran 11.5 at 119 mph on warm weather. 2.55 pulley only, stock exhaust/cats etc.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner SultanHassanMasTuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    All Around
    Posts
    3,149
    did you install the pulley, do you have a log?
    Follow @MASTUNING visit www.mastuned.com
    Remote Tuning [email protected]
    Contact/Whatsapp +966555366161

  5. #5
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by cesar View Post
    heres a tune file, 11.5 afr and 16ish degrees of timing, ran 11.5 at 119 mph on warm weather. 2.55 pulley only, stock exhaust/cats etc.

    Hello Guys,
    I have a CTS V here with the lingenfelter 650 upgrade and I cant seem to the thing to richen up at 2,000 rpms to 3,000 rpms. I would think I would have plenty of fuel and I attached the map I have so far? Am I missing something which would cause the vehicle to run at 13.0 air fuel? Any help is greatly appreciated 12.9.14 fuel changes.hpt

  6. #6
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    13
    What does your pcm commanded afr show in the 2-3k range?
    2009 CTS-V Sedan
    Lingenfelter 650 kit, ID850, AR 1.875" Headers, SW 3" Exhaust, Hptuners pro

  7. #7
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2
    Thank you! This looks like a good starting point... Is 11.5 as far as you want to go with the blower? I would usually limit my NA LS2 to 12.5...

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210
    dont go any leaner than 11.5 afr on your vehicle, anywhere from 10.8-11.5 is fine. It is a different tune when you have forced induction.

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by acm123 View Post
    Hello Guys,
    I have a CTS V here with the lingenfelter 650 upgrade and I cant seem to the thing to richen up at 2,000 rpms to 3,000 rpms. I would think I would have plenty of fuel and I attached the map I have so far? Am I missing something which would cause the vehicle to run at 13.0 air fuel? Any help is greatly appreciated 12.9.14 fuel changes.hpt
    fuel cut maybe? disable fuel control of boost in your supercharger tab

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by cesar View Post
    heres a tune file, 11.5 afr and 16ish degrees of timing, ran 11.5 at 119 mph on warm weather. 2.55 pulley only, stock exhaust/cats etc.
    What was the DA when you ran this? Tune might be holding you back. I ran an 11.47 @ 121.4 mph with stock pulleys, stock tune. I do have an Airaid intake and eliminated the two rear cats only.

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    Here's the log I ran on the 11.468 pass. I have a 2013 Coupe. Lots of knock retard too with stock tune. Look at my IAT1 and IAT2 temps. I ran both fans in the staging lanes and let the engine continue to idle.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by 8850 View Post
    What was the DA when you ran this? Tune might be holding you back. I ran an 11.47 @ 121.4 mph with stock pulleys, stock tune. I do have an Airaid intake and eliminated the two rear cats only.
    da was at 2k and the car is a sedan pulley only , ran 12.5 stock
    You must have a factory freak, that MPH is ridiculous for being stock

    Ill agree tho that if the cats are removed i could run a degree or two more of timing and probably trap at 2 mph higher. Car is an 09 btw, in fact this car was ran at royal purple raceway and i see nothing but pulley/cammed ctsv's running high 11s trapping 120 mph all day there. Tuned by G force.

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by cesar View Post
    da was at 2k and the car is a sedan pulley only , ran 12.5 stock
    You must have a factory freak, that MPH is ridiculous for being stock

    Ill agree tho that if the cats are removed i could run a degree or two more of timing and probably trap at 2 mph higher. Car is an 09 btw, in fact this car was ran at royal purple raceway and i see nothing but pulley/cammed ctsv's running high 11s trapping 120 mph all day there. Tuned by G force.
    The DA was -1300 when I ran that 11.468. And with my IATs so low it makes a difference. I did have drag radials and ran a 1.68 60'.

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    210
    Gotcha thanks for the info, the 11.5 was ran on street tires 1.9 60 ft and ambient temps were in the low 80s high 70s so im assuming iat's were a bit toasty. Thanks for the info 8850

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by acm123 View Post
    Hello Guys,
    I have a CTS V here with the lingenfelter 650 upgrade and I cant seem to the thing to richen up at 2,000 rpms to 3,000 rpms. I would think I would have plenty of fuel and I attached the map I have so far? Am I missing something which would cause the vehicle to run at 13.0 air fuel? Any help is greatly appreciated 12.9.14 fuel changes.hpt
    It's probably the blending of dynamic airflow being active below 4000. You should make tweaks to the SD side as well.

  16. #16
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Proxses View Post
    It's probably the blending of dynamic airflow being active below 4000. You should make tweaks to the SD side as well.
    Hello Proxses,
    What tables should I be changing on the SD sides and adding or subtracting the numbers . Thank you for your assistance. Also Anyone else that can chime in and help would be greatly appreciated. I have attached a log file on the most recent run and dyno graph along with the map. Its odd that is will fluctuate so drastically https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8ydv6q50t...3cjRduUJa?dl=0

  17. #17
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by acm123 View Post
    Hello Proxses,
    What tables should I be changing on the SD sides and adding or subtracting the numbers . Thank you for your assistance. Also Anyone else that can chime in and help would be greatly appreciated. I have attached a log file on the most recent run and dyno graph along with the map. Its odd that is will fluctuate so drastically https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8ydv6q50t...3cjRduUJa?dl=0
    I think he's referring to the VE tables.

    What mods do you have? Your 65-115 mph is very good at 5.843 seconds. Assuming your speedometer is dead on. That's the speed I've been using to determine what changes do for my V. On an 11.468 @ 121.44 mph my 65-115 was 6.131. You must be close to 10s at that time. I was running slightly smaller drag radials so my speedometer could be off some.

  18. #18
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by 8850 View Post
    I think he's referring to the VE tables.

    What mods do you have? Your 65-115 mph is very good at 5.843 seconds. Assuming your speedometer is dead on. That's the speed I've been using to determine what changes do for my V. On an 11.468 @ 121.44 mph my 65-115 was 6.131. You must be close to 10s at that time. I was running slightly smaller drag radials so my speedometer could be off some.
    Hello 8850,
    its a CTS -V with the lingenfelter 650 upgrade. I am just surprised how low the power is for a 650 kit? Do they normally run like that?

    http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...2#.VI9_QHvsfaU


    Thank you

  19. #19
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by acm123 View Post
    Hello 8850,
    its a CTS -V with the lingenfelter 650 upgrade. I am just surprised how low the power is for a 650 kit? Do they normally run like that?

    http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...2#.VI9_QHvsfaU

    Thank you
    I think they are referring to flywheel hp. If you had 650 rwhp you should run much better. I really don't see getting 650 flywheel hp even with pulleys with the stock air box and exhaust. My 2013 V picked up considerably with an Airaid intake. I've looked at the stock cat pipes and they are double walled and appear to be very restrictive. Not to mention all the crushed and dented portions in the rest of the exhaust.

    To give you an example, my stock V ran a 7.660 65-115. With an Airaid 7.098. My best with stock pulleys, Airaid, ported tb and rear two cats removed and with 3" smoth piping into stock mufflers, no tuning is a 6.068 but in 46* air. Not sure of ambient temps on other passes but much warmer and higher DA so not a direct comparison.

    I'll throw in my stock 2012 Z06 time of 5.569! And with headers, intake and tune it was into the 4.9xx range.

  20. #20
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    After reviewing your log you are getting up to 4.1* of kr. Have you verified your afr at that commanded 11.38 with a wideband? Maybe a little to lean???