HP Tuners 2.25 BETA Release (2011+ Mustang supported + others)

[schaid]

Soon, its at the top of the priority list.

This will be HUGE!!!

Any timeframe on getting wb's on scanner 2.24 or are we waiting for 2.25 for that? I see there is one listed for lambda b2, but it gives some erroneous reading like 64.00 or 149.00 or something like that.

[Tiffo60]

looking to log 3.5L Ecoboost, will the latest Beta allow for at least scanner functionality on this platform?

+1

[SultanHassanMasTuning]

Hello Eric,

can we pull 2012-2013+ Shelby's?

[schaid]

Saw that WB Lambda S1 and WB Lambda S2 were added to scanner...but I'm not sure 32,000 is the proper reading.

[Eric@HPTuners]

Hello Eric,

can we pull 2012-2013+ Shelby's?

Yes, I believe all of the definitions for those are done.

Saw that WB Lambda S1 and WB Lambda S2 were added to scanner...but I'm not sure 32,000 is the proper reading.

Yep, last week was our corporate meeting, I took my car into the office so I could have some assistance working on this issue. We discovered a minor bug that I am waiting to be corrected, and then this issue will be resolved, and I am going to get the other SAE and Mode 22 PIDs added to the current 2.24 scanner.

[schaid]

Yeah I was just going to post that I downloaded the latest 2.24 just under an hour ago and post the log...I actually found that multiplying pid.52 by 2,000,000,000 I was able to get lambda, but it was bouncing to negative numbers at times. It seemed to be working aside from that. If that gives you any help. I'm certain you've seen and tested this already.

By the way Mr. Brooks...took your advice from last year when you made mention of my cai and it being a bit of a mess to tune. Moved the maf closer to the filter...for the life of me I cannot get a screen shot...maf freq at idle 550-570uSec. Everything is smoothing out my friend. Thank you for your hard work and diligence.

Getting excited to completely walk away from sct soon as the wb situation is completely figured out!

[schaid]

I've only logged the wb's w/ the adjustment calc at idle. I will be testing the actual driving accuracy tomorrow.

[watman02]

Eric when u need tunes for 04 and earlier send me a pm I can get you the one for my car! 04 mach1 with an Eaton swap done with sct proracer. I can also get u stock if you want it... maybe?

[Eric@HPTuners]

Yeah I was just going to post that I downloaded the latest 2.24 just under an hour ago and post the log...I actually found that multiplying pid.52 by 2,000,000,000 I was able to get lambda, but it was bouncing to negative numbers at times. It seemed to be working aside from that. If that gives you any help. I'm certain you've seen and tested this already.

By the way Mr. Brooks...took your advice from last year when you made mention of my cai and it being a bit of a mess to tune. Moved the maf closer to the filter...for the life of me I cannot get a screen shot...maf freq at idle 550-570uSec. Everything is smoothing out my friend. Thank you for your hard work and diligence.

Getting excited to completely walk away from sct soon as the wb situation is completely figured out!

I had it displaying close to accurate values, but would bounce to negatives as well. It is a bug we will resolve quickly.

[schaid]

Very cool. As stated, looking forward to this.

Any more news on the compare function getting going?

[LEDbetter]

I know it has been on the back burner since it isn't popular vehicle to tune at the moment, but I have a 2010 AWD Traverse that I'm working around in beta on. Is there any chance that we can be seeing the Beta Scanner soon? Most of the pids that I need to log aren't available for the Traverse.

[TXjeepTJ]

Attempting to read a 2013 3.7L Mustang

I get the window that pops up asking about which hardware. I'm sort of scared to pick one, as I cannot find anything on the internet regarding what hardware the 3.7L uses. I know a guy in one of the first few posts said he chose copperhead, but he had a GT500.

Anyone know which hardware I should choose?

[wbt]

Attempting to read a 2013 3.7L Mustang

I get the window that pops up asking about which hardware. I'm sort of scared to pick one, as I cannot find anything on the internet regarding what hardware the 3.7L uses. I know a guy in one of the first few posts said he chose copperhead, but he had a GT500.

Anyone know which hardware I should choose?

ESYS 2048k

[SultanHassanMasTuning]

you can always click GET INFO and then click read

[schaid]

Any word on what the s550 will be running for an operating system?

[schaid]

I tried using my pro cable as a stand alone in my car the other day. Held the record button etc etc. The cable displayed error and didn't record any data. I loaded the config and it recognized the car after the fact just no data.

[Eric@HPTuners]

I tried using my pro cable as a stand alone in my car the other day. Held the record button etc etc. The cable displayed error and didn't record any data. I loaded the config and it recognized the car after the fact just no data.

Working on it

[schaid]

Figured it was something w the ford is due to I've used it as standalone on gm and it worked fine. Excellent sir. Carry on.

[lxlaw]

Yes, i pulled one yesterday

Hello Eric,

can we pull 2012-2013+ Shelby's?

[GPGTP]

Good job adding the knock scanning