commanded lambda * eq

[383]

Is this how I get commanded lambda when not at part throttle/cruise?

[Iam Broke]

Leave out PID.6010, The PE is already built into PID.6001 (On an E38)

Here's mine for E85, note the Stoich difference. Yours is fine for E10.

[383]

The PE is already built into PID.6001 (On an E38)

I did not know that, thanks.

[LSxpwrdZ]

You don't even need "Commanded AFR" to determine commanded Lambda. Depending on what vehicle you are working on the EQ is either equal to Lambda or is the inverse of lambda.

Gen3 LS1 and E40 is 1/[PID.68]=Commanded Lambda

E38/67 etc is [PID.68]=Commanded Lambda

For whatever reason the newer stuff reports EQ as Lambda.

[Iam Broke]

My 2012 E38 reports PID.68 as Commanded EQ Ratio. Might have to divide it into 1, won't be able to test until spring. Bee is in hibernation. I'll add it to the table.

[LSxpwrdZ]

My 2012 E38 reports PID.68 as Commanded EQ Ratio. Might have to divide it into 1, won't be able to test until spring. Bee is in hibernation. I'll add it to the table.

You may want to take a double look at that.... all of the E38's I've done are not true EQ and are in fact lambda. If when you go into PE the reading on Commanded EQ goes below 1.00 then it is lambda. If it goes above 1.00 (like Gen3 LS1's and E40's) then it is truly representing EQ and not lambda in which case you would need to take the inverse of it to get Lambda.

[383]

whats the benefit of these methods over the command afr? Will it display faster with less calculation?