Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 231

Thread: 2011-2014 Mustang Support Coming!

  1. #61
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by MMGT1 View Post
    This one is the 2012 MCA(Mustang Club America) V6
    As far as I can tell its a v6 with special suspension and badges, just don't know if there is anything different with the ecm in this one. I'm told it has Roush tuning so wanted to know if this one is covered... sounds like it is
    Yeah. That will be.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners View Post
    Get used to dealing with multiple tables. There are 16 Borderline Knock and 16 MBT Spark Tables. 16 Torque Tables. 16 Torque Inverse Tables, and for each portion of the speed density calculation, there are 16 tables. Each table represents a mapped point of intake and exhaust cam positions.
    Sounds time consuming to tune each individual table to each scenario they're designed for. This'll be fun lol.
    Total Masshole.
    2013 F150 FX4 Supercrew Ecoboost - STOCK
    2013 Mustang GT Premium - Lots of Mods, 424 RWHP SOLD
    2009 Cobalt SS/TC Black Sedan
    227whp/224wtq Stock. Dejon CP, K&N SRI, Forge BPV, Catless, BadMab Catless DP, MPx 3" Catback, HPT Tuned 328whp/425wtq. SOLD
    2004 GTO Pulse Red 1 of 512 - R.I.P. 5/31/09

  3. #63
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by taylor476 View Post
    run 11.6 ish a/f at wot and let the knock sensors map the timing curve. people were have cylinder 8 issues due to trying to run the cars leaners like you would in the previous year models. the TiVct causes alot of cylinder pressure resulting in issues with lean conditions. There were alot of people that also turning the knock sensor sensitivity down which has obvious issues. the big power gains on these cars is in the cam timing. i have done quite a bit of work on theses cars with great results.
    11.6 sounds a bit rich doesn't it?
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  4. #64
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,860
    13.0 AFR, 30* timing, let her eat.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  5. #65
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1
    11.6 would be right considering the stoich set in the ECU of 14.08. That's ~.82 Lambda which is what the 5.0L car likes N/A.

  6. #66
    Advanced Tuner bbrooks98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Gainesville, VA
    Posts
    301
    Hopefully the logger will get some PID additions/upgrades shortly after this is released? I would love to ditch livelink gen II.

  7. #67
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by bbrooks98 View Post
    Hopefully the logger will get some PID additions/upgrades shortly after this is released? I would love to ditch livelink gen II.
    It will. The current supported vehicles will also have much better (DMR) support. Fast logging and many more parameters.

  8. #68
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    13.0 AFR, 30* timing, let her eat.
    more like let her destroy cylinder 8. lol

  9. #69
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP View Post
    11.6 sounds a bit rich doesn't it?
    not for these. running them at leaner afr's makes them run to hot. causing cylinder 8 issues. this is the case with regular pump gas at least. with e85 you can run .83-.85 lambda safely due to the dramaticaly cooler combustion temps of the fuel

  10. #70
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Ah I guess I should have asked what stoich was set at first.

  11. #71
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    374
    Are there any bidirectional controls on Fords?

    Will the 05-10 mustang software be expanded with more tables, scalars, and logging PIDs?

  12. #72
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    I'm in
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  13. #73
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by pontisteve View Post
    Are there any bidirectional controls on Fords?

    Will the 05-10 mustang software be expanded with more tables, scalars, and logging PIDs?
    At a mimimum, I want the neutral profile correction controls add to the scanner since that is so commonly needed on the Coyote.

    I've been updating the 05-10 software already. If you find something missing let me know.

    The logging is going to improved on all the current supported vehicles too.

  14. #74
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners View Post
    At a mimimum, I want the neutral profile correction controls add to the scanner since that is so commonly needed on the Coyote.
    What's neutral profile correction?

  15. #75
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP View Post
    What's neutral profile correction?
    What Ford calls the CASE relearn.

  16. #76
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners View Post
    At a mimimum, I want the neutral profile correction controls add to the scanner since that is so commonly needed on the Coyote.

    I've been updating the 05-10 software already. If you find something missing let me know.

    The logging is going to improved on all the current supported vehicles too.
    Eric I appreciate how on top of this you are, your helping alot of people out, keep up the good work

  17. #77
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP View Post
    Eric I appreciate how on top of this you are, your helping alot of people out, keep up the good work
    Thanks, I am just passionate about Ford tuning! As a tuner myself, I've become mostly frustrated with the tuning tools currently on the market, and I am now in a position to do something about it.

  18. #78
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    You're doing us all a huge favor, once dodge comes out hptuners will be the best domestic tuner on the market hands down. Business should be nice this summer.

  19. #79
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    374
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners View Post
    Thanks, I am just passionate about Ford tuning! As a tuner myself, I've become mostly frustrated with the tuning tools currently on the market, and I am now in a position to do something about it.

  20. #80
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    30

    I've got a 2012 auto, I'm interested in doing a read and helping out.

    Hello I'm interested in doing a read and helping out.