Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Advantage of running the 1Bar OS over running the standard OS without a maf

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    9

    Advantage of running the 1Bar OS over running the standard OS without a maf

    Just like the title states. I have a 2000 S10 with a 5.3 H/C/I/E that I am running without a MAF and want to know if or what the Advantage of running the 1Bar OS.
    2000 Chevy S-10, RCSB Stepside,--SWAPPED--5.3L, Ported 241's, 9.2:1 CR, Comp 228/232 .571/.574, FAST92, 90mm TB, BUILT 4L60E, Yank ss4000, Trans cooler, 8.8 LSD 3.73 w/disks, Traction bars, Truck PCM, Tuned w/HPTuners by me, Current Performance Harness, poly motor/trans mount, Headman headers mids, 3" True Duals w/Magnaflow's, CAI, Battery under the bed, Chrome C6 Z06 Deep dish wheels

    337HP/304TQ
    12.99@106 w/1.91 60' with stock 4L60e, TCI3000 stall and 28" tall tire

  2. #2
    There's a detailed write-up by Bill or it might even be in the stickies or Help file, but main reason I use the Enhanced OS for MAFless cars is the retaining of dual spark tables. If you fail the MAF on a std OS, the PCM immediately reverts to Low Octane (and Secondary VE table with half resolution on some earlier OS). There are a couple of other benefits, but the that's the primary reason for me.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    RTT is the biggest reason. I normally don't care much about the dual spark table stuff because most of the setups I tune is 93+ octane anyhow so the low octane is just a copy of high octane. If you have a pre-00 OS it will do away with the half resolution secondary VE table which is what will be used on the stock OS.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400