Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Thread: Tune changes when adding long tubes?

  1. #21
    Advanced Tuner Sébast19X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    218
    '08 Black Z06
    PCM Tuned, LG super RAM, AR Headers, Hoosier DR2 295-55-15, MSD Atomic air force intake, Iceman 7.0 cam

    Best N/A E.T. : 8.836
    Best N/A Mp/h : 159.75
    DA for this pass: 0'

  2. #22
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    271
    Under your proportional section of ol/cl fuel you have airflow mode. This is read against lb/min. drive the car and scan your o2 sensors. usually with the headers around 15% throttle and light load the sensors will fall to the flow and will not oscillate. Take notice at what your maf is reading in lb.min. It should be at light load around 2-3 lb/min. increase the cells by 5% at a time. the first cell is 0 and the next is 8 so you would manipulate just those cells.

  3. #23
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by HoP View Post
    Under your proportional section of ol/cl fuel you have airflow mode. This is read against lb/min. drive the car and scan your o2 sensors. usually with the headers around 15% throttle and light load the sensors will fall to the flow and will not oscillate. Take notice at what your maf is reading in lb.min. It should be at light load around 2-3 lb/min. increase the cells by 5% at a time. the first cell is 0 and the next is 8 so you would manipulate just those cells.
    Thanks for the reply. What results are we looking for though after making these changes?

  4. #24
    Advanced Tuner Niemer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    371
    Quote Originally Posted by HoP View Post
    [o2] sensors will fall to the flow and will not oscillate.
    This happens to me coasting to a stop, 7-10% ETC and 1-1.5 lb/min. airflow, the narrowbands just drop out and the mix goes really lean then it finally catches itself. Could this also be why my STFTs are minus 1-3% but my wideband reads lean?

    What do the column numbers (0, 8, 16, 24, 32, etc...) represent?

  5. #25
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Finland, Europe
    Posts
    549
    Airflow mode. I think there's another table which links the mode and how much air flows to the engine.

  6. #26
    Anyone have any success with changing these tables?

  7. #27
    Bump! The lack of a methodical way to tune this is driving me crazy. I'm not smart enough to figure it out myself and I don't have enough free time to trial and error.

  8. #28
    Is this the correct way to do this on an 1999 trans am? I've been driving on someone else's tune since last year and finally just now have time to sit down and tune it. I have full exhaust only. Also adding doorman ls2 intake next month when I get a chance to put it on

  9. #29
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    17

    O2 distance & time

    I know this is kinda old, but....

    You guys are really bringing out some great, hard to find info.. I'm kinda new also and amidst tuning my 2000 silverado p01. 2" primaries are giving me a challenge with CL running AFR (lean 16.00) due to I believe incorrect response time on the factory o2's. (Rears deleted, 231 cam).. I have pretty well dialed the maf and ve and these run well in OL eachb on their own, but now have one question... should I be adjusting swtchpoints to help compensate for the increased header volume compared to stock, or should I focus more in the milliseconds in the "proportional integrator" airflow table? Just looking for advice from anybody with more experience... I'm going fairly lean in CL at lower rpm.... thanks 😊

  10. #30
    Advanced Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by BROWNSTONE View Post
    I know this is kinda old, but....

    You guys are really bringing out some great, hard to find info.. I'm kinda new also and amidst tuning my 2000 silverado p01. 2" primaries are giving me a challenge with CL running AFR (lean 16.00) due to I believe incorrect response time on the factory o2's. (Rears deleted, 231 cam).. I have pretty well dialed the maf and ve and these run well in OL eachb on their own, but now have one question... should I be adjusting swtchpoints to help compensate for the increased header volume compared to stock, or should I focus more in the milliseconds in the "proportional integrator" airflow table? Just looking for advice from anybody with more experience... I'm going fairly lean in CL at lower rpm.... thanks 😊
    Here ya go bro
    https://youtu.be/5hjzI8wSItk

  11. #31
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Cringer View Post
    Here I was thinking I wasn't gonna find any recent info on this ten year old thread, and y'all are still teaching the good stuff! I'm running into this issue with an LS3-swapped Grand National with long tubes with the O2s at the very end of the pipe. The tune is *close* but those silly lean spikes at part throttle and beyond reallyyyy bug me and make the car run like it has a vacuum leak. Gonna start from what's suggested here and hopefully get this fully dialed in.

    Thanks to all.

  12. #32
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,777
    Quote Originally Posted by bran View Post
    with the O2s at the very end of the pipe.
    If you described that right, there's no tuning that can make that work. Exhaust has pulses, and fresh air goes some distance back up the pipe with every pulse, worse at lower engine speeds. Sampling outside air is no good whether it comes from an O2 being too close to the end of a pipe or from an exhaust leak that pulls in fresh air upstream of a sensor.

  13. #33
    Advanced Tuner JayRolla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by blindsquirrel View Post
    If you described that right, there's no tuning that can make that work. Exhaust has pulses, and fresh air goes some distance back up the pipe with every pulse, worse at lower engine speeds. Sampling outside air is no good whether it comes from an O2 being too close to the end of a pipe or from an exhaust leak that pulls in fresh air upstream of a sensor.
    I think he meant at the end of the header pipe, not exhaust pipe. At least I hope so.
    2013 CTS-V Coupe M6 - 1 7/8" Headers, 3" x-pipe, stock mufflers, Airaid intake w/green filter, ID1050X injectors, DSXtuning flex fuel kit, DMS under hood tank, upgraded pump, 3/4" lines, griptec 2.4" pulley, solid isolator, 100mm idler, reinforced brick, MM mild catch can, AEM 30-0334 wbo2, 600whp/630wtq