Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: MAF orientation

  1. #1

    MAF orientation

    i have accidentally rotated my custom intake pipe few degrees down from the hood,, all fuel trims and idle readings changed dramatically,, the car went lean but idle became super smooth,,

    i can't understand how intake/maf geometrical orientation impacts airflow?
    and if it actually counts,, what is the best way to position intake pipe and maf?
    09 CTS-V A6

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner ttz06vette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlotte, NC.
    Posts
    242
    Few degrees shouldn't matter but significant orientation changes could change the way air is presented to the MAF.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    If there's a bend near the MAF (within three diameters as a rule of thumb), then orientation certainly impacts the calibration curve.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    3,184
    Airflow is never evenly distributed within a tube. Never ever ever. It always wants to flow on one side or the other, or top or bottom. Take a port in an intake manifold for instance, the airflow will hug the roof of the port in most cases.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  5. #5
    if i kept the MAF exactly in place,, what is the impact of extending the pipe for the filter to go all the way down to fog lamp area for colder air?

    i can't have the difference between IAT and ambient lower than 35F degrees,,
    Last edited by kj217; 05-05-2013 at 02:16 AM.
    09 CTS-V A6

  6. #6

  7. #7
    i have extended the intake pipe down to fog light opening,, IAT is only 7c deg higher than ambient but,, fueling is off,, needed to increase PE to maintain afr @ 11:1,, also spark advance histogram didn't read anything south 1.32 g/sec,, when the intake was short used to pass 1.36,,

    please,, share your thoughts,,

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    Fix the MAF for Fueling not just the PE table, I'd run that setup high 11's AFR for more power and tq. The Spark tables are in g/cyl not g/sec, and with that setup I would bet you should be maxing the 1.36 G/CYL limit. You can probably fix the axis on that table to read more though.

    As far as the MAF, what the other guys said. I personally had a Procharged setup with the MAF right after a 90 degree bend, couldn't tune around it till I moved the MAF further downstream into a straight in/out section.

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Charles View Post
    Fix the MAF for Fueling not just the PE table, I'd run that setup high 11's AFR for more power and tq. The Spark tables are in g/cyl not g/sec, and with that setup I would bet you should be maxing the 1.36 G/CYL limit. You can probably fix the axis on that table to read more though.

    As far as the MAF, what the other guys said. I personally had a Procharged setup with the MAF right after a 90 degree bend, couldn't tune around it till I moved the MAF further downstream into a straight in/out section.
    i adjusted PE a temporary work around to test potential impact of extending the intake pipe,, as i said MAF fueling is off,, but i can't see why -with long intake- reading don't even reach 1.36 g/cyl,,
    with the short intake the car runs better and healthier but IAT stays up around 125F,,

    how can i fix the x-axis in both histogram and main spark tables in tune file?
    09 CTS-V A6