Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 2010 Camaro 2.5bar OS Whipple driveability issues

  1. #1

    2010 Camaro 2.5bar OS Whipple driveability issues

    Ever since we did the 2.5 Custom OS on this car it has been nothing but an absolute headache to get the idle correct and get rid of some tip-in bucking.

    Quick run down
    2010 camaro Auto
    379 CI (3.825 Stroke x 4.067 bore)
    ~10.5:1 CR
    TEA ported LS3 heads
    227/240 625/601 113+3 bullet cam
    BTR platinum springs
    Kooks 1-7/8" headers to 3" corsa exhaust no cats
    CAI
    Whipple 2.9L 3.25 8-rib pulley
    IW 10% OD balancer
    ID850's
    ZL1 fuel pump
    MSD BAP
    NGK BR7EF gapped .025
    Dual pass Torq heat exchanger
    Yank PY3000 converter


    Intake system was tested for leaks with both pressure and smoke and none were found. Leakdown test showed less than 8% on all cylinders.

    When running in SD mode idle quality is absolutely horrible. Once the motor has any temperature it beings to surge and gets prononced enough to cause stalling. Turn the maf back on and it idles rock solid again like a properly tuned cam'd car should.

    While in SD mode car can be driven as long as it is not left to idle long periods of time normal. Can make rips on the dyno and pulls clean to ~7k when we shut down.

    Put the car in Blended mode on the dyno or street and all hell breaks lose again. Going from a dead stop or even steady state cruising then to WOT the car will pop/bang/spudder and just overall falls completely on its face. If you slowly roll into it you can get a clean pull. Checked for the "weak" maf and was not the case. The file uploaded keeps the car in blend mode at all times but tried it switching to maf only at 2k rpms no difference.

    Attached is the Config and a couple of scans from the dyno session and obviously the tune.


    Any insight to the idle qualities and the cause of the tip-in issues?

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    3,180
    What MAP sensor do you have in it?

    That's a shit ton of idle air. I'd put that back to stock and start over with that. There's no way it should be that high.

    Same with startup airflow. Way too high.
    Last edited by edcmat-l1; 03-26-2013 at 06:55 PM.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  3. #3
    ZR1 map sensor the "2525" red label

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    932
    Also set your displacement to the correct value... That'll piss stuff off in SD.

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Quote Originally Posted by smokeshow View Post
    Also set your displacement to the correct value... That'll piss stuff off in SD.
    Doesn't matter on E38s.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  6. #6
    Havent found many OS's that it matters and a whopping 14ci difference really isnt a make or break it deal here.

    When the Maf is enabled it is wanting just a little more than what is programmed for idle air. Any less and idle gets even worse.

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Your idle timing is way too low for that cam. That's why it needs so much idle air.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  8. #8
    What about the tip-in issues?

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    Doesn't matter on E38s.
    Why not?

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Quote Originally Posted by smokeshow View Post
    Why not?
    Gen IV uses totally a different method for volumetric efficiency that doesn't require displacement.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    Gen IV uses totally a different method for volumetric efficiency that doesn't require displacement.
    I see. I didn't know that displacement wasn't an input parameter... One of these days I will dig through Bluecat's stuff

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by 262 View Post
    Havent found many OS's that it matters and a whopping 14ci difference really isnt a make or break it deal here.
    Should be 3ci unless you meant 397 which the BxS works out to +21ci. Of course still doesn't matter on a 38/67
    Last edited by LT1Z; 03-27-2013 at 02:57 PM.

  13. #13
    Too many damn numbers to remember and partially ratarded 379-397 none the less its a moot point in this controller.

  14. #14
    Senior Tuner edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    3,180
    In the breakup log, it looks like your fueling is off bad, and that's why it's breaking up. You're lean as Jenny Craig off idle all the way to when you tip in on it, and it breaks up just because it has no fuel. Your WB shows lean, and your narrow bands too. Real lean.

    Can you post a log of it in SD? Have you tried turning your trims back on and dialing in your part throttle with the trims instead of WB error?

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  15. #15
    Short terms with the file as is with brand new o2's and confirmed no leaks bounce betwee -3 and +4 and I chase back and forth trying to get them any closer.

    I noticed when in OL that anything leaner than lambda 1 the narrows read less than 50 on most car we have tuned and same thing that richer than lambda 1 they tend to just stick at 850-900.

    I think I have a log from a clean pull in SD I will go back and check.