Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 48

Thread: Dialing in low LSA cam idle

  1. #21
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Idle clip from this morning, when I got to work. It idles better in gear.

    http://youtu.be/OTxiIqL9B-Y

  2. #22
    Senior Tuner IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Roswell, N.M.
    Posts
    1,956
    Oh you're Enginerd off the G8 forum aren't you? License plate gave it away

    Sounds good to me, now you need to time your injectors to the cam (so do I) and rid yourself of that crappy axleback setup. I hated my Magnaflow as it sounded like that too, till I changed to this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rth8K...g&feature=plcp
    Gray Ghost- The abomination. 2007 Chevrolet Silverado CCSB. 98mm turbo, nitrous, 428LSX, Rossler 80E with a brake. Finally finished. 23 psi, no numbers, Slow as hell.

    PBM G8- Aluminum 364, twin Precision 67/66 turbos, 6L90 trans swap, CTS-V/Vaporworx fuel system, slowly making progress.

    Dads 2011 CTS-V- Stock bottom end, stock heads, LS9 cam, pullies, ported blower, ported TB, D3 goodies, and lots of nitrous.
    618/618 motor
    906/862 spray

    Caterpillar 50 Forklift- Duramax swap

  3. #23
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by IDRIVEAG8GT View Post
    Oh you're Enginerd off the G8 forum aren't you? License plate gave it away

    Sounds good to me, now you need to time your injectors to the cam (so do I) and rid yourself of that crappy axleback setup. I hated my Magnaflow as it sounded like that too, till I changed to this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rth8K...g&feature=plcp
    Nope, I'm blkscooby on all forums. I have the Dynomax ST axlebacks that I welded 'cause I have a limited budget. I like how it sounds. It sounds brutal at idle, quiet at cruise, perfect at WOT.

  4. #24
    Senior Tuner IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Roswell, N.M.
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by blkscooby View Post
    Nope, I'm blkscooby on all forums. I have the Dynomax ST axlebacks that I welded 'cause I have a limited budget. I like how it sounds. It sounds brutal at idle, quiet at cruise, perfect at WOT.
    Hmm, I was about to say, I didn't know you (assuming you were the other person) had cammed your car.

    Eh, I hate the plugged up popping sound at idle, that's essentially from tip resonance which is excessive back-pressure created at the Y in the tips. It hurts performance, but not enough to care about if you like it like that.

    Have you looked into injector timing?
    Last edited by IDRIVEAG8GT; 09-24-2012 at 03:10 PM.
    Gray Ghost- The abomination. 2007 Chevrolet Silverado CCSB. 98mm turbo, nitrous, 428LSX, Rossler 80E with a brake. Finally finished. 23 psi, no numbers, Slow as hell.

    PBM G8- Aluminum 364, twin Precision 67/66 turbos, 6L90 trans swap, CTS-V/Vaporworx fuel system, slowly making progress.

    Dads 2011 CTS-V- Stock bottom end, stock heads, LS9 cam, pullies, ported blower, ported TB, D3 goodies, and lots of nitrous.
    618/618 motor
    906/862 spray

    Caterpillar 50 Forklift- Duramax swap

  5. #25
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Yeah, it added 13* to the EOIT boundary last week and it seemed to cut down on the raw fuel smell but it also changed the exhaust note. Not sure where it should ultimately end up, hopefully someone else can help. I read through the whole Gen 3 thread discussing it but it was very helpful for tuning a Gen 4.

  6. #26
    Senior Tuner IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Roswell, N.M.
    Posts
    1,956
    PM sent.
    Gray Ghost- The abomination. 2007 Chevrolet Silverado CCSB. 98mm turbo, nitrous, 428LSX, Rossler 80E with a brake. Finally finished. 23 psi, no numbers, Slow as hell.

    PBM G8- Aluminum 364, twin Precision 67/66 turbos, 6L90 trans swap, CTS-V/Vaporworx fuel system, slowly making progress.

    Dads 2011 CTS-V- Stock bottom end, stock heads, LS9 cam, pullies, ported blower, ported TB, D3 goodies, and lots of nitrous.
    618/618 motor
    906/862 spray

    Caterpillar 50 Forklift- Duramax swap

  7. #27
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Pay close attention to when your intake valve opens and when your exhaust valve closes.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  8. #28
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    Pay close attention to when your intake valve opens and when your exhaust valve closes.
    I plan to get more scientific about the tuning EOIT later; I just wanted to see if increasing the boundary and positive or negative would affect the desired change. It seems advancing the boundary values does do what I assumed it would.

  9. #29
    Senior Tuner IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Roswell, N.M.
    Posts
    1,956
    That's what Steck and I are discussing.

    So you added degrees to the boundary target to clean up the fueling? I always tried to retard it. Maybe that's why it seemed to get worse when I messed with the boundary target
    Gray Ghost- The abomination. 2007 Chevrolet Silverado CCSB. 98mm turbo, nitrous, 428LSX, Rossler 80E with a brake. Finally finished. 23 psi, no numbers, Slow as hell.

    PBM G8- Aluminum 364, twin Precision 67/66 turbos, 6L90 trans swap, CTS-V/Vaporworx fuel system, slowly making progress.

    Dads 2011 CTS-V- Stock bottom end, stock heads, LS9 cam, pullies, ported blower, ported TB, D3 goodies, and lots of nitrous.
    618/618 motor
    906/862 spray

    Caterpillar 50 Forklift- Duramax swap

  10. #30
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Ehh, bored at work today, soooo...

    I attached a spreadsheet that calc'd my valve events but the summary is

    0.050" lift closed
    IVO- 354.4 IVO- 327
    IVC- 573.5 IVC- 602
    EVO- 129.5 EVO- 103
    EVC- 362.5 EVC- 398

    Stock EOIT normal, warm engine, at idle is (520-110)=410* ATDC. My new target is (533-110)=423*.


    Quote from Chris on LS7 injection tables( same logic as the G8), borrowed from the EOIT thread...

    Quote:
    Boundary is the latest point in time that fuel can make it into the cylinder for the current injection period. It is measured in degrees AFTER TDC compression. It is also the earliest the injector can fire again after the completion of the last injection event. ie. the boundary defines the start/end of a complete injection cycle.

    Normal End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the normal pulse (the main pulse) should finish. The hardware calulates the start of injection time from the EOIT and the desired PW.

    Makeup End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the first makeup pulse should finish. Makeup pulses are extra pulses that can be injected to inject more fuel during an injection cycle rather than having to wait for the next cycle. There can be more than one makeup pulse but the makeup EOIT specifies the EOIT of the first makeup pulse.

    The makeup PW minimum is a minimum PW for the makeup pulses, they cannot be shorter than this (if they are they don't happen).

    So you have the boundary that defines the injection cycle, a normal EOIT that specifies the EOIT for the main pulse, and finally a makeup EOIT that specifies the EIOT for any makeup pulses that might be needed if a fuel increase is commanded during an injection cycle but after the main pulse has occurred.

    Hope that helps.

    Chris...
    Last edited by blkscooby; 09-24-2012 at 06:38 PM.

  11. #31
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by IDRIVEAG8GT View Post
    That's what Steck and I are discussing.

    So you added degrees to the boundary target to clean up the fueling? I always tried to retard it. Maybe that's why it seemed to get worse when I messed with the boundary target
    I tried to retard it first and it had no affect. Then I advanced it and it was better. +13* may not be ideal for me but now after researching further I believe that advancing the boundary some amount will improve the idling.

  12. #32
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Now that I have the idle airflow fixed and the low end MAF correct, I pushed the EOIT out to 20* advanced and the car is awesome. So I'm not quite sure how to get from cam overlap to required EOIT advance, but 20* EOIT for my 8* overlap cam works great. Just have to fix an exhaust leak and I'm on to E85 tuning.

  13. #33
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    20* may not be mathematically perfect, but definitely a step in the right direction. I think you mean you retarded EIOT though. Advancing would be spraying sooner and losing more through the exhaust valve.

    Ideally, 0.006" events should be used if you really want to get great results. Bigger injectors give more flexibility too because of the drastically reduced crank rotation of the firing.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  14. #34
    Senior Tuner IDRIVEAG8GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Roswell, N.M.
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by blkscooby View Post
    Now that I have the idle airflow fixed and the low end MAF correct, I pushed the EOIT out to 20* advanced and the car is awesome. So I'm not quite sure how to get from cam overlap to required EOIT advance, but 20* EOIT for my 8* overlap cam works great. Just have to fix an exhaust leak and I'm on to E85 tuning.
    Post your latest tune up. I'd like to pit it against this stock file I have in front of me.
    Gray Ghost- The abomination. 2007 Chevrolet Silverado CCSB. 98mm turbo, nitrous, 428LSX, Rossler 80E with a brake. Finally finished. 23 psi, no numbers, Slow as hell.

    PBM G8- Aluminum 364, twin Precision 67/66 turbos, 6L90 trans swap, CTS-V/Vaporworx fuel system, slowly making progress.

    Dads 2011 CTS-V- Stock bottom end, stock heads, LS9 cam, pullies, ported blower, ported TB, D3 goodies, and lots of nitrous.
    618/618 motor
    906/862 spray

    Caterpillar 50 Forklift- Duramax swap

  15. #35
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    20* may not be mathematically perfect, but definitely a step in the right direction. I think you mean you retarded EIOT though. Advancing would be spraying sooner and losing more through the exhaust valve.

    Ideally, 0.006" events should be used if you really want to get great results. Bigger injectors give more flexibility too because of the drastically reduced crank rotation of the firing.
    Yes, retarding the injection to end later in the intake stroke. By advancing, I meant adding to the timing of the injection boundary.

    Here's my current tune.

  16. #36
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by blkscooby View Post
    Ehh, bored at work today, soooo...

    I attached a spreadsheet that calc'd my valve events but the summary is

    0.050" lift closed
    IVO- 354.4 IVO- 327
    IVC- 573.5 IVC- 602
    EVO- 129.5 EVO- 103
    EVC- 362.5 EVC- 398

    Stock EOIT normal, warm engine, at idle is (520-110)=410* ATDC. My new target is (533-110)=423*.


    Quote from Chris on LS7 injection tables( same logic as the G8), borrowed from the EOIT thread...

    Quote:
    Boundary is the latest point in time that fuel can make it into the cylinder for the current injection period. It is measured in degrees AFTER TDC compression. It is also the earliest the injector can fire again after the completion of the last injection event. ie. the boundary defines the start/end of a complete injection cycle.

    Normal End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the normal pulse (the main pulse) should finish. The hardware calulates the start of injection time from the EOIT and the desired PW.

    Makeup End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the first makeup pulse should finish. Makeup pulses are extra pulses that can be injected to inject more fuel during an injection cycle rather than having to wait for the next cycle. There can be more than one makeup pulse but the makeup EOIT specifies the EOIT of the first makeup pulse.

    The makeup PW minimum is a minimum PW for the makeup pulses, they cannot be shorter than this (if they are they don't happen).

    So you have the boundary that defines the injection cycle, a normal EOIT that specifies the EOIT for the main pulse, and finally a makeup EOIT that specifies the EIOT for any makeup pulses that might be needed if a fuel increase is commanded during an injection cycle but after the main pulse has occurred.

    Hope that helps.

    Chris...
    Jeremy, this is awesome, how're you arriving at this values in the calculation, for instance where does the 520-110 or 533-110 comes from ?
    "Stock EOIT normal, warm engine, at idle is (520-110)=410* ATDC. My new target is (533-110)=423*"

  17. #37
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Look at the modifiers and read the descriptions.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  18. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by blkscooby View Post
    Ehh, bored at work today, soooo...

    I attached a spreadsheet that calc'd my valve events but the summary is

    0.050" lift closed
    IVO- 354.4 IVO- 327
    IVC- 573.5 IVC- 602
    EVO- 129.5 EVO- 103
    EVC- 362.5 EVC- 398

    Stock EOIT normal, warm engine, at idle is (520-110)=410* ATDC. My new target is (533-110)=423*.


    Quote from Chris on LS7 injection tables( same logic as the G8), borrowed from the EOIT thread...

    Quote:
    Boundary is the latest point in time that fuel can make it into the cylinder for the current injection period. It is measured in degrees AFTER TDC compression. It is also the earliest the injector can fire again after the completion of the last injection event. ie. the boundary defines the start/end of a complete injection cycle.

    Normal End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the normal pulse (the main pulse) should finish. The hardware calulates the start of injection time from the EOIT and the desired PW.

    Makeup End of Injection Target (EOIT) is the angle before the boundary (in degrees) that the first makeup pulse should finish. Makeup pulses are extra pulses that can be injected to inject more fuel during an injection cycle rather than having to wait for the next cycle. There can be more than one makeup pulse but the makeup EOIT specifies the EOIT of the first makeup pulse.

    The makeup PW minimum is a minimum PW for the makeup pulses, they cannot be shorter than this (if they are they don't happen).

    So you have the boundary that defines the injection cycle, a normal EOIT that specifies the EOIT for the main pulse, and finally a makeup EOIT that specifies the EIOT for any makeup pulses that might be needed if a fuel increase is commanded during an injection cycle but after the main pulse has occurred.

    Hope that helps.

    Chris...
    Would you please post a link to the original thread about the LS7 injection tables? I have searched and found this same quote in many threads, but can't find the original. Thanks.

  19. #39
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegoat06 View Post
    Jeremy, this is awesome, how're you arriving at this values in the calculation, for instance where does the 520-110 or 533-110 comes from ?
    "Stock EOIT normal, warm engine, at idle is (520-110)=410* ATDC. My new target is (533-110)=423*"
    This is simply the boundary minus the normal. I pushed the boundary so that it affects both the normal fuel pulse and any makeup pulses. I could have adjusted the normal but low RPM was 0* and I wasnt sure it would work with a negative value here and the makeup pulses would not have been shifted.
    Last edited by blkscooby; 09-29-2012 at 01:17 AM.

  20. #40
    Tuner blkscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by HRD View Post
    Would you please post a link to the original thread about the LS7 injection tables? I have searched and found this same quote in many threads, but can't find the original. Thanks.
    http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32510