Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Why is my OLSD VE tuning under/over shooting so bad?

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    479

    Why is my OLSD VE tuning under/over shooting so bad?

    I cannot figure this out for the life of me. Im trying to tune VE and when it says add 7% ill add it and then it goes very rich and says remove 12%..then goes super lean and says add 17% ect ect...what am I missing here?

    60#injectors full return fuel system 434ci 262/266
    2018 Infiniti Q60s


    2004 350z/LS2: ERL 434ci, 11.8:1,TFS245cc,262/266@113+3,Fast102,NX 102 plate,60#injectors/return w/twin 255s
    Old setup: CNC'd317s, Fast 102, 228/228@114, PT88,83#injectors/full return system. 10.84@138

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    555
    I would guess it is related to IAT and ECT When I ran SD on my GTO, I made sure to tune all within the same weather condition. I think some advances have been made to the bias tables nowadays that someone might be able to shed light on. The bias tables will help the IAT/ECT from wildly modifying fueling.

    This could also have nothing to do with your problem, but just something to note.
    2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS

    Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Multiply by half percent.

    Also, hand smooth the table every time.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    Multiply by half percent.

    Also, hand smooth the table every time.
    Good advice on both parts. Better to do incremental changes more so than big changes at a time. Another helpful idea may be to increase his hit count for data so that he gets more samples of data and therefore more "accurate" data.
    2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS

    Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado

  5. #5
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
    Multiply by half percent.

    Also, hand smooth the table every time.
    Do you mean the entier table or section and if it's section which ones??? I'm not understanding smoothing????
    F1-x 26psi boost duel nozzle meth Alky kit
    6.0l 1999 C5 LS-1 6 speed manual.
    225,225/575,575 114lsa, 9.5.1 com, SD80inj LS2 Intake and ls2 90tb

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    not sure if you are using trims or wb, but if trims in cl, clear your trims each time you log.

  7. #7
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs Boson View Post
    not sure if you are using trims or wb, but if trims in cl, clear your trims each time you log.
    WB, OL
    F1-x 26psi boost duel nozzle meth Alky kit
    6.0l 1999 C5 LS-1 6 speed manual.
    225,225/575,575 114lsa, 9.5.1 com, SD80inj LS2 Intake and ls2 90tb

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    Then ghost is probably right, your Bias Temp table is probably skewing your reading.