Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Turned on STFTs and they are off.....

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    301

    Turned on STFTs and they are off.....

    I am currently running an SD tune on my c5 ls1. I spent the last week tuning my VE table...hitting as many cells as possible in as steady state as I could get on the street. I tuned this using a VE Lambda error histogram...I did a conversion in hptuners to display my dynojet wideband in units of Lambda. Yes I had my trims and fuel cutoff disabled . I got everything dialed in very nicely...between .99-1.01 and I verified that across different days and weather patterns..it is rock solid according to my wideband and the car runs VERY smooth. No bucking...I can cruise control at 900 rpms in 6th...the cam is a 227/235.

    So today I turned back on my STFTs (I don't use LTFTs) and they were off as high as -12% in some areas! So I figured, ok maybe my lambda calculation was off...so I did another log just logging raw AFR values (again with STFTs off) and every cell I hit was hovering around 14.7 AFR, so I was just about dead on. With the STFTs turned back on, my AFR was consisently in the mid 15s!

    A week ago, before I began tuning, I did get the 02 heater codes on both banks, but the code cleared itself and never came back a day later. Could my 02s just be on the way out or is this normal behavior for having headers and a cam? I see people like to run the corvette rear 02 sensors and run an adapter. Could that be my solution? Or should I just run OLSD?

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    271
    Your correct, it's a discrepancy between your wideband O2 and the old narrow bands.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Also in closed loop, the evap purge valve will open, causing negative fuel trims.

    Russ Kemp

  4. #4
    I've been experiencing the same thing. Is it okay that the narrow bands are off that far and pulling out that much fuel? Will putting new narrow bands in fix that?

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K View Post
    Also in closed loop, the evap purge valve will open, causing negative fuel trims.

    Russ Kemp
    I wish we had control of that because I've been watching this really closely on my dyno and once I get open loop lambda dialed in within 1% error I'll turn closed loop back on and fuel trims are usually perfect for about 10 seconds and then all of the sudden you'll see them take a nose dive up to -20% then taper back off up to around -10%.

    I believe there is a EVAP correction or airflow table to help combat huge swings in fueling but I could be wrong. This is why I alway's take the EVAP solenoid off all my car's and block off the evap line.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    I wish we had control of that because I've been watching this really closely on my dyno and once I get open loop lambda dialed in within 1% error I'll turn closed loop back on and fuel trims are usually perfect for about 10 seconds and then all of the sudden you'll see them take a nose dive up to -20% then taper back off up to around -10%.

    I believe there is a EVAP correction or airflow table to help combat huge swings in fueling but I could be wrong. This is why I alway's take the EVAP solenoid off all my car's and block off the evap line.
    So is the correct way just to tune with STFTs then?

    My heater codes came back on both 02 sensors...I am going to replace them.

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    This is why I alway's take the EVAP solenoid off all my car's and block off the evap line.
    Not a good plan, how are the fuel vapours removed from the charcoal canister with the Evap purge solenoid removed/capped?

    Russ Kemp

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Quote Originally Posted by BigMike42 View Post
    So is the correct way just to tune with STFTs then?

    My heater codes came back on both 02 sensors...I am going to replace them.
    Did you check for power & ground to the O2 heater circuit? Open fuse? Never seen both O2 heaters failing at the same time.

    Russ Kemp

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    301
    You guessed it Russ, it was just the fuse. All looks good now...I didn't log STFTs but my wideband is now reporting smaller switches...idle is going 14.6-15.0 now. I am happy that I didn't have to stop $160 on 02 sensors.

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K View Post
    Not a good plan, how are the fuel vapours removed from the charcoal canister with the Evap purge solenoid removed/capped?

    Russ Kemp
    They arent lol.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400