Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 4.8L VE table vs 6.0L VE table

  1. 08-05-2011 #1
    OldSkool69
    OldSkool69 is offline
    Tuner OldSkool69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    111

    4.8L VE table vs 6.0L VE table

    Thing is a friend just replace his 4.8L for a 6.0L

    He still using his 4.8L PCM, and he ungraded his license to 2MAP.

    Now, When I was checking his tune, VE table column numbers ran from 30KPA to 210KPA, normal thing for the 2BAR enhancement.

    But numbers in between were in 10th, not in 5th like my table.

    Example it went like, 30, 40, 50, 60, ...210
    Mine goes 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55,....210.

    The rest of the file seems to match mine.

    Is there a way to change his values to resemble mine?
    Last edited by OldSkool69; 08-06-2011 at 02:35 AM.
    Silverado 2001 4wd rcsb, LS 6.6L, Edelbrock Super Vic manifold, Aarons 102mm elbow, Wilson 105mm TB, AEM dual Nozzle water/meth kit, 60 psi injectors, Automotive FPR, dual Walbro Fuel pump setup, compcam 230/234-.572-.576-114, WCCH Stage 2 heads, Front Mount Turbo MP45R Turbo, Intercooler , dual 3" maganflows, no Cats, CKPerformance Billet 4L80E, ProTorque converter, 14 bolt Detroit TrueTrac 3.73.

    Camaro 69 SS Mast LSX454, FLT 4L60E.

    Silverado 2009 Hybrid 4wd Waiting for HPTUNERS
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-05-2011 #2
    mecanicman
    mecanicman is offline
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,931
    The differeance is in the pcm. You have an 0411 pcm, he has something newer. Newer pcms did not have room to double the size of the table, so they cut the resolution in half to double its capacity(or something to that effect).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-06-2011 #3
    OldSkool69
    OldSkool69 is offline
    Tuner OldSkool69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    111
    so he is stuck with his low res VE primary table?

    no other way?
    Silverado 2001 4wd rcsb, LS 6.6L, Edelbrock Super Vic manifold, Aarons 102mm elbow, Wilson 105mm TB, AEM dual Nozzle water/meth kit, 60 psi injectors, Automotive FPR, dual Walbro Fuel pump setup, compcam 230/234-.572-.576-114, WCCH Stage 2 heads, Front Mount Turbo MP45R Turbo, Intercooler , dual 3" maganflows, no Cats, CKPerformance Billet 4L80E, ProTorque converter, 14 bolt Detroit TrueTrac 3.73.

    Camaro 69 SS Mast LSX454, FLT 4L60E.

    Silverado 2009 Hybrid 4wd Waiting for HPTUNERS
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 08-06-2011 #4
    Nitroused383
    Nitroused383 is offline
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    209
    The 04 GTO's are the same way.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 08-09-2011 #5
    LSxpwrdZ
    LSxpwrdZ is offline
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Yep stuck with it... the resolution still isn't bad honestly, it's just the resolution stock is overkill. ALOT of standalone EMS's still have less resolution than that even!
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »