Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Logging Airflow 2bar custom OS

  1. #1
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77

    Logging Airflow 2bar custom OS

    So I have a bar custom OS installed and I want to be able to record total airflow in LB/min. MAF is completely gone.

    do I change the high RPM disable on Dynamic Airflow to be able to read values above 4k RPM?


    Oh and just so everyone can see:
    3 runs recorded on the cam put together.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVuEMXPCpuI
    Last edited by zl1killer; 06-19-2011 at 08:33 PM.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Yep for pure SD set the dynamic airflow disable rpm above your rev limit. To get total airflow log dynamic airflow.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  3. #3
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    OK, sweet. Thats what I had thought.

    2nd question. With this Custom OS 2 Bar, for fueling it is:
    PE enablers & etc with Power Enrichment - EQ Ratio vs. RPM
    and Boost Enrichment vs MAP

    Both the mentioned above tables are set to 1.31 Lambda (11.15 AFR)
    As this is a 2 bar Custom OS, fueling is directly controlled via the VE table correct?

    so to get my fueling down to the 1.31 lambda, I would log PRimary VE vs RPM vs MAP with a wideband as a comparator (input)

    Raise VE values for fuel, lower to subtract. I know this is a rather basic question, just want to make sure I have my bearings straight before I fall head first.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Yep got it right! Log commanded AFR as well as your wideband that way you can use the AFR Error PID. Log the AFR Error into your 2bar SD table histogram and it tells you the percentage off the VE table is. Your basically targeting what you input in the PE/BE tables when those are enabled and when you are not in PE/BE it will use the commanded EQ from the OLFA (open loop fuel/air) table located in the open loop/closed loop tab.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  5. #5
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    ok now what about Fuel trims. Right now WOT from my dyno pulls my LTFTs are +8 in my 7psi VE range and at 13psi they are at +6 in the VE range.

    so the fuel trims are adding 8 and 6% fuel at that point...how do I get that to zero (or near zero)?
    I can post the dyno graph and the log from the dyno pull.
    Last edited by zl1killer; 06-22-2011 at 03:18 PM.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  6. #6
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    Yep for pure SD set the dynamic airflow disable rpm above your rev limit. To get total airflow log dynamic airflow.
    and the maximum the MAF could have read was 67.7LB/min = 512g/s

    Well, even with the 4k rpm dynamic airflow limit, it still was changing above 4k rpm... but railed at 67.7 lb/min. If I remember right, this is the maximum. So how do I actually see (calculated) or actual airflow that my engine is consuming?
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner robbyredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    fingerlakes ny
    Posts
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by zl1killer View Post
    ok now what about Fuel trims. Right now WOT from my dyno pulls my LTFTs are +8 in my 7psi VE range and at 13psi they are at +6 in the VE range.

    so the fuel trims are adding 8 and 6% fuel at that point...how do I get that to zero (or near zero)?
    I can post the dyno graph and the log from the dyno pull.
    run open loop for 0 or tune the livin' fudge out of it for near 0. thats the crappy thing about ltft's is that they are on for be, at least they are rich when they are on.
    04 6.0 silvy china turbo
    87 gn
    03 stroker evo ww
    00 ss camaro

  8. #8
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    I'm also unsure of this Dynamic Airflow that I originally asked about... I don't think it is going to display more than 67LB/Min no matter what I change.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  9. #9
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    any input from logging airflow with a 2 bar custom OS??

    I do not believe I will be able to log above 67.7 lb/min. I raised my rpm disable limit on the dynamic airflow and it still maxed at 67.7 and I know 100% that I'm around 75 lb/min of air MAX.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  10. #10
    Advanced Tuner robbyredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    fingerlakes ny
    Posts
    356
    if you don't mind me asking. ............. why do you want to log dynamic airflow?
    04 6.0 silvy china turbo
    87 gn
    03 stroker evo ww
    00 ss camaro

  11. #11
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    honestly, I don't know what else to log to see what airflow in LB/min (or whatever units, I can convert) that I'm flowing. I would like to know where I am with regards to airflow and my setup (turbo).
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner robbyredneck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    fingerlakes ny
    Posts
    356
    is your map reading not enough info? i tried logging airflow in 2bar and did'nt get any real data. i think because there is no real meter, there is no real data and any data that you do get is "calculated". try searching mnr i think he kinda goes over this
    Last edited by robbyredneck; 06-26-2011 at 12:28 PM.
    04 6.0 silvy china turbo
    87 gn
    03 stroker evo ww
    00 ss camaro

  13. #13
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    map reading is simply pressure. manifold absolute pressure. that is what I was thinking about regards to a sensor reading airflow. Remove the MAF... and no sensor reading airflow.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner blownbluez06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Forney, TX
    Posts
    982
    Quote Originally Posted by zl1killer View Post
    ok now what about Fuel trims. Right now WOT from my dyno pulls my LTFTs are +8 in my 7psi VE range and at 13psi they are at +6 in the VE range.

    so the fuel trims are adding 8 and 6% fuel at that point...how do I get that to zero (or near zero)?
    I can post the dyno graph and the log from the dyno pull.
    I hope you're not misunderstanding the LTFT's. Turn your LTFT's off and keep them off. They are no indication of your WOT fueling being proper or improper.
    Hsquared racing engines RHS 427, Procharger F2, Moran Billet Atomizer injectors, Alky Control,Mast LS7 heads, Nitrous outlet kit,Tilton quad disc clutch, DSS shaft, RKT56 ZR1 trans, RPM Quaife diff. Built and tuned by yours truly.

  15. #15
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by zl1killer View Post
    OK, sweet. Thats what I had thought.

    2nd question. With this Custom OS 2 Bar, for fueling it is:
    PE enablers & etc with Power Enrichment - EQ Ratio vs. RPM
    and Boost Enrichment vs MAP

    Both the mentioned above tables are set to 1.31 Lambda (11.15 AFR)
    As this is a 2 bar Custom OS, fueling is directly controlled via the VE table correct?

    so to get my fueling down to the 1.31 lambda, I would log PRimary VE vs RPM vs MAP with a wideband as a comparator (input)

    Raise VE values for fuel, lower to subtract. I know this is a rather basic question, just want to make sure I have my bearings straight before I fall head first.
    WHOOWW whoow whoow... LAMBDA 1.31 is NOT 11.15AFR.
    1.31 = 19.2322 AFR
    0.759 Lambda is 11.15 AFR

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by blownbluez06 View Post
    I hope you're not misunderstanding the LTFT's. Turn your LTFT's off and keep them off. They are no indication of your WOT fueling being proper or improper.
    That is what I was thinking...
    he is not tuning with LTFTs on WOTs and targeting 1.31 Lambda...

  17. #17
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Def turn off the LTFT! They are no good at all! They are only used on factory GM vehicles to keep the tune true from vehicle to vehicle with the same tune... So since your tuning to your setup there is no need for it's stored correction. If you use CL only use STFT!

    As for the Dynamic Airflow deal the maximum the PCM will read is 512g/sec on the datalogging however that is why going SD on a boost setup is nearly a must because it will physically fuel more than 512g/sec it just wont log it.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  18. #18
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    wait a minute... ok I must have confused the two.
    EQ Ratio in HPTuners in my tune is 1.31 ( 14.7 / 1.31 = 11.22 )
    I'm using the STFTs and LTFTs to get my VE in line at part throttle condition.

    So on a factory car off the show room floor, at WOT, if the LTFTs are +8 they are doing nothing with physically adding fuel? It is just an indicator as the VE table is off?

    I have read the FAQ with STFTs and LTFTs and I know I need to watch the STFTs as they are the instant values.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...

  19. #19
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    346
    As mentioned several times in other threads,
    if LTFT are Positive (add fuel) this carries to PE, so ECM adding more fuel. meaning, if you had a perfect VE in PE/wot, its now rich, hence why many also state to tune the car and only re-enable STFT and keep the LTFT disabled.
    - this prevents over time skewing of your GOOD tuned VE table during WOT.

    Also remember its important to tune the VE with LTFT Reset otherwise will be tuning with whatever trim values are stored at that time.

    here are just a couple:
    http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...ght=stft+reset
    http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...ght=stft+reset
    Last edited by smithers; 07-23-2011 at 01:28 PM.

  20. #20
    Tuner zl1killer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    77
    Out of curiosity if I wanted to prove this theory of the LTFTs adding fuel, could I simply disable closed loop fueling in bi-directional controls, and go WOT(make a pull), and then re-enable and go WOT and if they are different (LTFTs +) it should be richer.
    01 T/A WS6 #4984 PM for info...funny rear mount...father/son build.
    My STS build
    NEW: TC76, 69.65# FIC725, FPR, External Bosch 044, Moser 12 3.42,
    Manifolds, Forged Rods + Pistons,

    Numbers to come...