Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Explaination of BE (Boost Enrichment)

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    346

    Explaination of BE (Boost Enrichment)

    Hi all,

    Spent a few hours looking through threads on this, perhaps someone can clarify.
    BE. (using a 2bar OS)

    A few threads mention that there are some issues with this. Spiking, transition from (PE EQ vs RPM) to BE tables? can someone clarify this scenario? when does this occur?

    what is the PROPER method of using all these items in the Power enrichment tab when using a centrifugal.

    Do you eliminate the PE Enable TPS % and go solely with MAP enable (ie. 85kpa)?

    Do you just throw 1.27 in the PE EQ vs RPM table (11.5:1 for example) and the same in the BE table? or do you use the BE table at all?
    Or same values in and slowly go richer in the BE?



    Thanks in Advance.
    Last edited by smithers; 02-23-2011 at 11:46 AM.

  2. #2
    the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.

    For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.

    BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).

    Some tuners will also use BE as a safety mechanism to protect the engine if the customer changes the wastegate settings manually or if an electronic wastegate controller is fitted (E-boost). They set BE at the max boost limit and then really richen up the fuel above that. In the newer PCMs we added an overboost fuel cut to provide even better protection for this case.

    Hope that helps,

    Chris...
    I count sheep in hex...

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    346
    Chris,
    Thank you for the clarification.
    Good explanation of the intent and use of BE as well as the underlying issues.

    So I will lower the TPS % enable to a low value and utilize using the MAP (Map PE Enable) as a PE trigger at 85kpa (approx) ...
    And have the target 11.5:1 AFR for example in the PE (EQ ratio vs RPM) table (1.27 right across)
    and as you mentioned, will have BE (EQ table) set the same (1.27) and slightly richer with higher boost. Either have the BE Enable map at 105kap or I could just increase the BE Enable Map to a value near max desired boost.
    Last edited by smithers; 02-23-2011 at 06:55 PM.

  4. #4
    Tuner DWC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    70
    Bump

  5. #5
    Tuner DWC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    70
    Under Boost enrichment vs. MAP,do theses settings need to be the same across or is it ok to stagger them? Looking at lower numbers in the 100kpa to help spool and higher numbers starting at 180 kpa to help with knock.

    Regards
    DWC

  6. #6
    I like how when you are buying, this is what is said: "- New MAP referenced "Boost Enrich" table".

    While true, the code is so slow to respond sometimes it isn't useful as a tuning tool, or really even as a safety. I can set it to turn on at 100KPA and it can be as delayed as 140KPA before it kicks on.

    My issue with using PE is, I am in the 11's for 85-100KPA. Not a big deal I suppose. when I have some time, I plan on setting the PE eq to 1, the throttle % low, and using the MAP enable set at 85 to go into PE. When in PE mode, it should look at the OLFA and use the richer of the 2 values. I'm hoping to set my OLFA to 12.8 for 80-95, and then 11.6 for 100KPA. I then will set my BE to be 11.4 and enable at 100KPA. I'm hoping I'll be 12.8 for 80-95, 11.6 for 100KPA to 1??KPA (BE delay is usually around 30KPA for me), then 11.4 till redline. I'm guessing this works...feel free to give it a shot if you have time first

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    932
    Bumping this.. I've been aware of the BE delay for a while now, but it has never proved itself an issue on my personal vehicle. Coding delays notwithstanding, I've used BE as the primary enrichment for quite some time now and have never had any concern as to whether the delay would cause lean problems on a boost transition. I have a ball bearing twin turbo setup on my 6.0 and the MAP graph on the scanner is just about vertical after mashing the throttle, so its not like its a laggy setup giving BE time to react.

    So, what kind of delay are we talking here? 0.1 seconds, milliseconds? And is the delay in the commanded EQ ratio following a transition to boost enrichment, or is the delay in the actual delivered fuel following the commanded EQ?

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    Yea, I have no idea what delay people are seeing. I've never had an issue with it.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  9. #9
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    It's not an issue on the 4th gen PCM's but on the 3rd gens I've seen/heard of it taking seconds.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,859
    I do a lot of boosted third gens, and still never have an issue.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    I have a few logs from turbo cars that are on the wastegate and still at 1.13 commanded EQ from the PE table because the BE table hasn't enabled. Some cars are worse than others due to features the PCM processor has to process.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    I have a few logs from turbo cars that are on the wastegate and still at 1.13 commanded EQ from the PE table because the BE table hasn't enabled. Some cars are worse than others due to features the PCM processor has to process.
    How much is it delayed? Enough to be dangerous? Obviously if you're running 175kpa and 1.13EQR there is a problem lol

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Quote Originally Posted by PICNIC_GEORGE View Post
    How much is it delayed? Enough to be dangerous? Obviously if you're running 175kpa and 1.13EQR there is a problem lol
    You can set it up to where the worst lag still doesn't hurt it. I ended up setting it up so that lower rpm PE is commanding what I would want on a NA engine and then ramp the BE in as boost increases. The trick is setting the enable point sooner on the BE so that it isn't as laggy. Normally I'll go down to 100kPa or 105kPa as the enable point. As a safety precaution I'll go in the upper RPM region of the PE table and command the same amount of fuel that I would at full boost just to make sure fuel is there in case BE has a brain fart.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  14. #14
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,668
    I've never had an issue with a delay on a commanded EQ ratio in boost using BE on the Red/Blue or Green/Blue enhanced OS's. I've always set the enable KPA to 105 KPA, and then set the 105 KPA cell to match the number I'd run in normal PE on an NA engine...after that I ramp fuel in with the rest of the BE table, and the commanded EQ always follows.

    The only delays I've seen (on the P59's), are due to the "Enable Torque" setting in the PE section. Seems to not matter on most files that start from cars, but does seem to matter on trucks. If I leave that number at 100%, it will cause some calibrations to not enable BE or PE for a delayed amount of time, and that delayed time seems to be inconsistent, depending on when the driver smashes the pedal down. On those applications, I set desired torque to 0%, and PE/BE enrichment kicks in instantaneously when my other conditions (TPS/MAP) dictate that it should.
    2010 Camaro SS M6. Stock Bottom End, Heads/Cam/Intake/Headers/Exhaust.
    2005 Silverado RCSB. Forged 370 LQ9/Borg-Forced Inductions T6 S484/Jake's Stage 4 4L80E with D3 Brake/4WD.
    2023 Durango Hellcat

  15. #15
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  16. #16
    Tuner Stuffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@HPTuners View Post
    the issue is it does not activate as fast as PE does, there is a longer delay due to the processing loop the code is in.

    For any kind of engine driven supercharger just use PE.

    BE was intended for use as a safety mechanism on turbocharged vehicles when the turbo could spool for some reason below the PE threshold and run lean. This generally happens if the turbocharger is not sized correctly for the engine (too big or too small). When i had twin turbo's on my car i used PE only and had BE set to enable at the same enrichment as PE when boost exceeded 110kPa. Usually if the turbo is unexpectedly spooling it is not at a high load situation anyway (your TPS is below PE threshold).

    Some tuners will also use BE as a safety mechanism to protect the engine if the customer changes the wastegate settings manually or if an electronic wastegate controller is fitted (E-boost). They set BE at the max boost limit and then really richen up the fuel above that. In the newer PCMs we added an overboost fuel cut to provide even better protection for this case.

    Hope that helps,

    Chris...

    can someone please post an example or tune i can take a look on how to use PE on a centrifugal SC?

    I have use 2bar OS and always use the PE for N/A area ,and set BE to the boost area (105kpa an up)