Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: running 30PSI with 2.5 SD OS

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245

    running 30PSI with 2.5 SD OS

    taking delivery of my ERL SUPERDECK soon. 6 bolt, oil squirters, girdle, morel lifters,bronze lifter bores, swaintech coatings on pistons bearing etc......
    motor is setup for standing mile.

    now not saying that ill be able to push it that far nor do i know if my compressors can provide but what would be my options be as far as work around?

    this is what came to mind as far as a work around:
    rape the 255kpa line
    or
    install 3 bar map, make approriate scaling changes (what the hell everything else is scaled)

    is there any truth that once BE is pegged that the e38 reverts back to PE?
    [IMG][/IMG]

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    969
    nick,
    id go stand alone at that level, alot to lose finding out the hard way. send me pics when that fast explodes!

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by carlrx7 View Post
    nick,
    id go stand alone at that level, alot to lose finding out the hard way. send me pics when that fast explodes!
    That is gone....lsx 102 with NW.
    Carl really wanna stick with DBW.
    who even knows if I have enough compressor to make it. Probably not.
    [IMG][/IMG]

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Do the e38's and coil packs have ignition problems like the LS1's do above 1k-1.2k hp?
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    Do the e38's and coil packs have ignition problems like the LS1's do above 1k-1.2k hp?
    Not to my knowledge. Running Mitsubishi truck coils.
    [IMG][/IMG]

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    I kind of like the scaled 3 bar idea. I would have PE=BE anyhow. I don't think you'll find yourself in a PE and not BE very much anyhow. I know I don't but maybe it's different with a turbo car. I don't like the raping the 255 kPa line idea as you'd basically have to tune it for kill boost and live with it being richer on anything less.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    479
    What about scaling the tune? Does that have any effect on the map sensor? If you scale by 50% shouldn't you have double the limit?
    2018 Infiniti Q60s


    2004 350z/LS2: ERL 434ci, 11.8:1,TFS245cc,262/266@113+3,Fast102,NX 102 plate,60#injectors/return w/twin 255s
    Old setup: CNC'd317s, Fast 102, 228/228@114, PT88,83#injectors/full return system. 10.84@138

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner DSteck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    4,860
    Scaling for injectors has nothing to do with the MAP sensor.

    DSX Tuning - Authorized HP Tuners Dealer
    http://www.dsxtuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/dsx.tuning
    Just say no to bull s***.
    IF YOU WANT HELP, POST A FILE!

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by 5_Liter_Eater View Post
    I kind of like the scaled 3 bar idea. I would have PE=BE anyhow. I don't think you'll find yourself in a PE and not BE very much anyhow. I know I don't but maybe it's different with a turbo car. I don't like the raping the 255 kPa line idea as you'd basically have to tune it for kill boost and live with it being richer on anything less.
    well bill it would only be rich at the 15psi range...not below that.
    [IMG][/IMG]

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    3,253
    Put a 3 bar MAP in it, setup your linear and offset, then modify the axis' of the VE tables. BAM done! Resolution to 300Kpa.

    PS, Nick, if you don't know how to do it, email it to me and I'll set it up and send it back. [email protected]

    Edit: Nevermind. Won't let ya go any higher than 255Kpa.........
    Last edited by edcmat-l1; 02-07-2011 at 03:02 PM.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    969
    the only thing i can thing of is write down what your key on engine off map reading is.

    then put in the 3 bar, and tweak the offset value so it reads what the previous sensor read.

    that automatically scales your map values, you will need to redo your ve, but its all i can think of right now.

  12. #12
    I've tried that. I couldn't get it to work correctly. There isn't any good work around that I have found with that ECU.

    Stand alone engine management time if you are serious about doing it "right" like I know you are...

  13. #13
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by edcmat-l1 View Post
    Put a 3 bar MAP in it, setup your linear and offset, then modify the axis' of the VE tables. BAM done! Resolution to 300Kpa.

    PS, Nick, if you don't know how to do it, email it to me and I'll set it up and send it back. [email protected]

    Edit: Nevermind. Won't let ya go any higher than 255Kpa.........
    Thanks ed for posting. Yeah that's why I said its scaled too. Have to make a mental note that 255 kpa really is 310.
    [IMG][/IMG]

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by FirstGen View Post
    I've tried that. I couldn't get it to work correctly. There isn't any good work around that I have found with that ECU.

    Stand alone engine management time if you are serious about doing it "right" like I know you are...




    U might be right. At this point what stand alones are available that work well with a car that will spend 95% trolling the streets.
    [IMG][/IMG]

  15. #15
    Sent you a PM on CF. I would run the new M84 ecu from Motec if it was my car.

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by FirstGen View Post
    Sent you a PM on CF. I would run the new M84 ecu from Motec if it was my car.
    K
    [IMG][/IMG]

  17. #17
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    80
    Motec hands down.
    Can still retain your FBW, plus incorporate your boost control, plus many other features.
    I would use an M800, the M84 is a great value ECU but i think in this case you would benifiet from having the more user programable axis.

    You might as well use their CDI 8 also while your their.

    Just remember Motec is a top notch product but it is still only as good as your tuner.

  18. #18
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by carlrx7 View Post
    the only thing i can thing of is write down what your key on engine off map reading is.

    then put in the 3 bar, and tweak the offset value so it reads what the previous sensor read.

    that automatically scales your map values, you will need to redo your ve, but its all i can think of right now.
    live in the east part of PA so close to sea level. car apart now but i'd imagine 2.5 would read 93~kpa. so if i plug in zr1 map it should read somewere in the 87~kpa area. so carl tweak offset so that it reads somewere close to 93~ but leave sesor linear as OS only goes to 255. is that correct or change linear too?


    thanks!
    [IMG][/IMG]

  19. #19
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    Offset only. Use the correct values for the ZR1 MAP and then subtract the difference of however much more than 255 kPa you expect to be from the offset. So if I expected to hit 290 kPa I would subtract ~50 from the offset. I haven't run any numbers but this assumes you are within the physical range of the ZR1 MAP.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  20. #20
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    245
    Quote Originally Posted by 5_Liter_Eater View Post
    Offset only. Use the correct values for the ZR1 MAP and then subtract the difference of however much more than 255 kPa you expect to be from the offset. So if I expected to hit 290 kPa I would subtract ~50 from the offset. I haven't run any numbers but this assumes you are within the physical range of the ZR1 MAP.
    Bill thanks for responce.
    So the 2.5 os will be able to handle a zr1 linear value? I didn't that it would as ve reads to 255. I thought that I'd have to scale, in my mind, what new kpa values would be.
    [IMG][/IMG]