Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: STFT kicking in in Open Loop??

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Marion, KS
    Posts
    78

    STFT kicking in in Open Loop??

    I have been logging on my stock 2010 Camaro trying to make sure I know what I'm doing in preperation for a blower next week. Ran it in closed loop and tweeked on the MAF about 4% from 3000 hz and up. LT and ST fuel trims were just about all 0's now. Hooked up my AEM wb and was doing some logs in what I thought was open loop to make sure it was reading normal. I had unpluged and removed the drivers side front o2 sensor to install my wb. I thought in OL that would be ok. Logged my 10 mile trip home last night and noticed afterward that about 4 min (frame 4153) into the log it had 2.3% STFT on bank 1. It goes back to 0 WOT but then comes back at cruise. I set the CL enable temp and o2 readiness temp to 285. I set the LTFT enable learn temp to 285. DFCO temp enable to 285. COT to disable. I set all 4 OL EQ ratio tables to 1.00. Does that sound correct?? Hopefully someone can tell me what is going on.

    thanks
    Stan
    6 sec 648TT Outlaw 10.5 86 Camaro (sold), 2010 Camaro SS (sold), 64 chevy C10 w429ci LS3 M6, 2020 Challenger Hellcat Redeye

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    Did you clear out the fuel trims after disabling closed loop?
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  3. #3
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Marion, KS
    Posts
    78
    I thought so. Just wierd that it took so long to show up. This morning it did the same thing after 6 minutes of logging.
    6 sec 648TT Outlaw 10.5 86 Camaro (sold), 2010 Camaro SS (sold), 64 chevy C10 w429ci LS3 M6, 2020 Challenger Hellcat Redeye

  4. #4
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Marion, KS
    Posts
    78
    Cleared the trims several times. Bank 1 still ends up coming up with 1 to 3 % STFT. It doesn't seem to be doing anything I believe?? Both inj banks have the exact same pulsewidth. I even comanded open loop with the VCM controls and it made no difference. If I comanded closed loop it of coarse went nuts and had about 20% trims with the left narrow band O2 sensor missing. Should I worry about this or just ignore it???
    6 sec 648TT Outlaw 10.5 86 Camaro (sold), 2010 Camaro SS (sold), 64 chevy C10 w429ci LS3 M6, 2020 Challenger Hellcat Redeye

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    That is weird. The tune you posted has everything correct for true open loop. Try reflashing it maybe? Sometimes I forget whether I've flashed a tune I've edited or not.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  6. #6
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Marion, KS
    Posts
    78
    Noticed that whenever the speed goes to 4mph or less the trim is either reduced or goes back to 0.

    There is not a problem pulling the stock o2 sensor like I did is there?? I had one vendor tell me I couldn't do that but it didn't make sense that I couldn't in OL.

    If it is really triming one bank wouldn't the injector pulse widths be different??
    6 sec 648TT Outlaw 10.5 86 Camaro (sold), 2010 Camaro SS (sold), 64 chevy C10 w429ci LS3 M6, 2020 Challenger Hellcat Redeye

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    The only problem I could see is it would keep you from being able to do closed loop. In open loop there shouldn't be a problem.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    Do you have the option selected to use stft in open loop?

  9. #9
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Marion, KS
    Posts
    78
    I have seen that field on some LS1's ive tuned but I don't see a field like that on my LS3 unless I'm just missing it. I of coarse have a check engine light on because of the missing o2 sensor. Could that have anything to do with this??? Would unchecking the diagostic codes off the list do anything with this??? It takes several miles before the STFT shows up on the log, could that be the time it takes to run diagnostics??

    thanks
    6 sec 648TT Outlaw 10.5 86 Camaro (sold), 2010 Camaro SS (sold), 64 chevy C10 w429ci LS3 M6, 2020 Challenger Hellcat Redeye

  10. #10
    Anyone figure this out? I have the same problem in my 09 CTS-V. Refuses to go true OL, driving me insane.
    '18 Sierra L5P
    '03 Sierra 4.8/NV 3500: LS6 Cam, HPT Tuned
    '15 Explorer Sport - SCT, AEM (Wife says...it feels faster??)
    '01 Z06

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    555
    Set your 02 readiness parameters to 284. I had this same issue and Bill from HPTuners suggested I do this. Worked like a charm.
    2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS

    Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado

  12. #12
    I thought I had that handled in my tune, didn't save it correctly.

    So, yes I agree - 02 to 284. And, also make sure you also save the file
    '18 Sierra L5P
    '03 Sierra 4.8/NV 3500: LS6 Cam, HPT Tuned
    '15 Explorer Sport - SCT, AEM (Wife says...it feels faster??)
    '01 Z06

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by 5_Liter_Eater View Post
    Did you clear out the fuel trims after disabling closed loop?
    I know this threads old but, what do you mean by clearing out the fuel trims after disabling CL? Do you mean in the scanner?
    Last edited by Brians6; 03-11-2012 at 07:18 PM.

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by Brians6 View Post
    I know this threads old but, what do you mean by clearing out the fuel trims after disabling CL? Do you mean in the scanner?
    Yup, with the VCM controls.
    2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS

    Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado

  15. #15
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    277
    I noticed this on a 07 avalanche I just tuned a couple weeks ago. I think that I ended up forcing open loop in the scanner vcm controls then cleared fuel trims. When I did that it seemed to stay in open loop with no STFT.

  16. #16
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    18
    So, if you reset the fuel trims once you allow it to go back into CL what happens? I ask because when i did this my LTFTs were all over the place and im not sure if they were like that before as i did not take a log before dicking around with OL /:

  17. #17
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    555
    Brian, try what I suggested about the 02 Readiness. I give credit to Bill for suggesting that one to me because I couldn't understand why CL kept working even though I turned it "off".

    If you allow it to back in to CL, it works just like normal while in CL. If your LTFTs were all over the place then I would imagine your fueling is off Just clear the LTFTs and let them rebuild if you are concerned.
    2012 Chevy Cruze A6 1LT RS

    Formerly - 2004 GTO, 2002 Z28, 2007 Colorado, 2008 Silverado

  18. #18
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Gh0st View Post
    If your LTFTs were all over the place then I would imagine your fueling is off Just clear the LTFTs and let them rebuild if you are concerned.
    Did that last night and thats when i got the irradicate LTFT's however i just took another log this morning on my way to school and they seem to be getting better, i guess it just takes awhile for them to settle and re-learn?
    thanks for the help