Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 143

Thread: 6L80E TCC Apply Issue Fixed!!!

  1. #121
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by da vette guy View Post
    Matbe i'm missing something my 2008 Vette factory setting for slip is already set to 0s..
    Looks like that is the trend with the vettes. The CTSV only has values in 5th and 6th.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  2. #122
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5
    I was just making these change on my stock G8 and I noticed if you double click
    on the whole table another table comes up Turbine RPM Axis.
    Surprised the hell out of me. Anyone ever see this?
    Should I leave the Min slip AC on at 20rpm?
    Last edited by mondi2002; 02-17-2011 at 08:31 PM.

  3. #123
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by mondi2002 View Post
    I was just making these change on my stock G8 and I noticed if you double click
    on the whole table another table comes up Turbine RPM Axis.
    Surprised the hell out of me. Anyone ever see this?
    Should I leave the Min slip AC on at 20rpm?
    That is the same if you were to right click and edit the "Col Axis".
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  4. #124
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by mondi2002 View Post
    I was just making these change on my stock G8 and I noticed if you double click
    on the whole table another table comes up Turbine RPM Axis.
    Surprised the hell out of me. Anyone ever see this?
    Should I leave the Min slip AC on at 20rpm?
    The min slip AC is probably there so you don't notice the AC compressor transition as much. If your tuned correctly, your AC will disengage at a more power conducive RPM/TPS anyway. I don't see the number causing harm, but I have mine set to ZERO. I've noticed any value of 20 or less still leads to a slip RPM of 10 or less with a stock converter. 20 RPM does not mesh with a triple disk however.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  5. #125
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    HP has recently released another update for the 6L80E. This update allows full control of the TCC min apply (adder). I've tested it and works as advertised.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  6. #126
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Waker View Post
    The min slip AC is probably there so you don't notice the AC compressor transition as much. If your tuned correctly, your AC will disengage at a more power conducive RPM/TPS anyway. I don't see the number causing harm, but I have mine set to ZERO. I've noticed any value of 20 or less still leads to a slip RPM of 10 or less with a stock converter. 20 RPM does not mesh with a triple disk however.
    The compressor cycles on and off constantly even while cruising. The slip is there so you don't feel it all the time, especially sitting at a stoplight like you can with older cars. you can feel it bonk on and off.

  7. #127
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Waker View Post
    HP has recently released another update for the 6L80E. This update allows full control of the TCC min apply (adder). I've tested it and works as advertised.
    .150 or is there a newer one?

  8. #128
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,525
    newer.
    Jaime

  9. #129
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Newest is 2.23.193
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  10. #130
    Senior Tuner Higgs Boson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    3,299
    Damn, can I get on an auto update list? Everytime I get one a new one comes out! lol.

  11. #131
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs Boson View Post
    Damn, can I get on an auto update list? Every time I get one a new one comes out! lol.
    HP is doing a good job with adding critical tables as we find a need for them. I'll take one update a week if it means I get to have more control over something...
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  12. #132
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Collinsville IL
    Posts
    697
    im running 23.128 since ive had little to no issues with it, what does the newest have for the 6L80E?
    https://www.facebook.com/tuningbyshanehinds
    [email protected]
    2009 G8 GT [email protected] 1.60 - Sold
    2008 A6 LS3 C6 Cammed [email protected] 1.44 Sold
    2013 CTSV wagon 9.21@151
    2015 C7Z bolt ons 10.0

  13. #133
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by 04blackgmc View Post
    im running 23.128 since ive had little to no issues with it, what does the newest have for the 6L80E?
    Full control of the TCC min/max apply value. Currently the stock setting is 17.8 psi which is not conducive to triple disk converters. Those feel better with a zero min apply. I run multiple values depending on the converter I'm running. Guys who want to lockup at WOT while racing can run a tune that applies max value instantaneously.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  14. #134
    Advanced Tuner PGA2B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    474
    Ok, so I zero'd out all my TCC tables and LOST fuel efficiency. Is there any harm in making my tables diminishing tables for the gears? In other words, decrease the values as the TPS% increases until I get to Zero for the values? I posted a question about this also http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=33264. I would think you would not want any slip at higher TPS% anyway.
    2013 OBM A6 CTS-V Coupe
    Mods: Headers back Billy Boat Exhaust, GripTec 2.65, 8.6 PowerBond Lower, LSX Innovations Solid Isolator, ID850's, NGK TR7IX's, Accel 9070CK Wires, Spectre CAI, SRI Ported Throttle Body, SRI Catch Can, NGK AFRM, 160* T-Stat, 0fx2gv Brick, Hard Line Delete W/3/4" Lines, FB 101 FMIC, Pierberg CWA50, Stoptech Drilled/Slotted Rotors, EBC Redstuff, Cut Stock Springs, Flat Bottom Steering Wheel
    2006 Black Raven STS-V (Traded In)
    Fully Modded: 459RWHP@5888rpm/451lbft@4696rpm

  15. #135
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by PGA2B View Post
    Ok, so I zeroed out all my TCC tables and LOST fuel efficiency. Is there any harm in making my tables diminishing tables for the gears? In other words, decrease the values as the TPS% increases until I get to Zero for the values? I posted a question about this also http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=33264. I would think you would not want any slip at higher TPS% anyway.
    The TCC slip tables are torque vs. rpm not TPS. Odd that you would lose fuel efficiency, commanding a lower rpm generally leads to better economy. I would say there are other factors at play. If you are commanding zero slip in DOD mode, which is where the money is made, you are definitely getting better economy. I gained 2 mpg just by doing that. I can drive from my house to OKC on one tank with 3.7 gears. The stock setup yielded the same trip/fuel used as well, but now I run 11's. The general rule of thumb is to mimic stock theory and refine it for your application. With the stock converter you can try just about anything, its single disk setup is pretty forgiving. I would say to play with multiple variations and see what feels the the best.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  16. #136
    Advanced Tuner PGA2B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    474
    So the DOD and the TCC AC tables BOTH need to be zero'd, correct? If so I only completed 1/2 the equation. I will have to dig into it tonight.

    Be Gentle.....I'm still learning.
    2013 OBM A6 CTS-V Coupe
    Mods: Headers back Billy Boat Exhaust, GripTec 2.65, 8.6 PowerBond Lower, LSX Innovations Solid Isolator, ID850's, NGK TR7IX's, Accel 9070CK Wires, Spectre CAI, SRI Ported Throttle Body, SRI Catch Can, NGK AFRM, 160* T-Stat, 0fx2gv Brick, Hard Line Delete W/3/4" Lines, FB 101 FMIC, Pierberg CWA50, Stoptech Drilled/Slotted Rotors, EBC Redstuff, Cut Stock Springs, Flat Bottom Steering Wheel
    2006 Black Raven STS-V (Traded In)
    Fully Modded: 459RWHP@5888rpm/451lbft@4696rpm

  17. #137
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by PGA2B View Post
    So the DOD and the TCC AC tables BOTH need to be zero'd, correct? If so I only completed 1/2 the equation. I will have to dig into it tonight.

    Be Gentle.....I'm still learning.
    Yes the DOD tables need zeroed as well. The normal tables will simply allow lockup at lower gear/speeds. As load is induced so is fuel consumption, so locking up at certain rpms will infact require more fuel. The benifit of zeroing out the DOD tables is overall load is decreased as the engine goes into 4 cylinder mode. You can monitor this with the delivered torque PID selected. I see savings in your future if you can keep your foot out of it LOL!!!
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  18. #138
    Advanced Tuner PGA2B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    474
    Except I do not have DOD so I think I may be SOL.......... Mine is VVT.
    2013 OBM A6 CTS-V Coupe
    Mods: Headers back Billy Boat Exhaust, GripTec 2.65, 8.6 PowerBond Lower, LSX Innovations Solid Isolator, ID850's, NGK TR7IX's, Accel 9070CK Wires, Spectre CAI, SRI Ported Throttle Body, SRI Catch Can, NGK AFRM, 160* T-Stat, 0fx2gv Brick, Hard Line Delete W/3/4" Lines, FB 101 FMIC, Pierberg CWA50, Stoptech Drilled/Slotted Rotors, EBC Redstuff, Cut Stock Springs, Flat Bottom Steering Wheel
    2006 Black Raven STS-V (Traded In)
    Fully Modded: 459RWHP@5888rpm/451lbft@4696rpm

  19. #139
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by PGA2B View Post
    Except I do not have DOD so I think I may be SOL.......... Mine is VVT.
    Hmm you sure you don't? Send me your tune and I'll take a look.

    Ah the supercharged northstar. Nope you don't. Surprised you even had stock desired slip in 6th gear. Well at least you have a blower, that means more potential boost.
    Last edited by Waker; 03-10-2011 at 08:10 PM.
    11.49 @ 118 1.49 60' Bolt on 2010 IOM Camaro

    www.6l80etuning.com 6L80/90 Tuning

  20. #140
    Advanced Tuner Niemer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    371
    Sorry to bump an old thread but it seemed like a good place to post this. I've set all the tables to 0 both for AC off and DOD, but I'm still getting a bunch of slip. I'm really green when it comes to tuning, but I've read this whole thread plus the A6 basics thread, so I know a little, maybe even enough to be dangerous.
    Last edited by Niemer; 07-25-2012 at 09:36 PM.