Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Fuel Trims on a 2.2 Ecotec

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, Tennessee
    Posts
    53

    Fuel Trims on a 2.2 Ecotec

    From a Jbody ecm.

    I have a histogram set up to monitor my fuel trims so I can make changes to my pe tables instead of using the wideband, they seem to be less extreme and make the car happier instead of choppier.

    I'm only monitoring Short Term Fuel Trims and making the changes to the VE table according to those. My question is this: Do the Short Term and Long Term add together to make the total fuel trim? Say my STFT is 3% and my LTFT is 4% in any one cell. Would I have to add a total of 7% to make the full correction in my VE table, or will the 3% do it?

    I hope that makes sense.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    Not familiar with your setup, but the LTFT's & STFT's sum in the LNF's so I would think that is the case with yours. Never offset all at once though, If they add to +7%, I'd prob multiply by 1.04 or 1.05 to start off. Someone more knowlegable than I will post though.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Reading, PA
    Posts
    352
    I would try to work the LTFT's to -2 or so. The STFT's are always going to be a moving target on our car. I've found a HUGE difference in AFR going from summer to winter (~1.5:1!!).

    If we had the fueling IAT multipliers available, we might be able to tune once and leave it, but to keep it dead on, you'll need a re-tune with the seasons. Or find a happy average temperature and deal with rich in the summer and lean in the winter
    2013 Cruze Eco - CAI, Catless DP, Catless MP, ZZP FMIC, Ported Intake Manifold, Mild tune (17psi), best 43.5mpg, 175ftlbs (pid)

    2008 Solstice GXP - ZFR 6758, catless, AEM stage 1 water/methanol injection, Hahn Racecraft Intercooler, solo street race cat back, LE5 throttle body - 307whp on a dyno dynamics (stock turbo numbers), 100 octane EFR6758 numbers - 463whp/454wtq

  4. #4
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, Tennessee
    Posts
    53
    I'll give that a try. Thanks for the tip.

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner HawkZ28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Waverly, NE
    Posts
    475
    If in the same cell, you have an LTFT of -3, and a STFT of +4, you'd want to mult - 1/2 by the -3, and then mult - 1/2 the +4. That is what (on average) the computer is already pulling/adding to acheive lambda.

    If you can disable the LTFT and tune off of STFT, it's a LOT faster/easier. You shouldn't tune off STFT alone when your LTFT are enabled- you are only getting part of the puzzle that way.

    I wouldn't tune your PE tables with the NB either...are you positive the histo for the WB is set up correctly- maybe it's a voltage offset or something messing it up....? The NB's just aren't accurate at anything other than lambda 1.

    Also, don't forget to reset your trims with the scanner (if capability is there with your PCM) before you start logging again.

    Hope that helps you out
    Hawk

  6. #6
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, Tennessee
    Posts
    53
    I thought I would update the thread. I've been using a histogram I set up that adds LTFT and STFT together, then adding half the change to the ve tables. I've done it twice and the car is a LOT more responsive. Thanks for the help!