Page 15 of 22 FirstFirst ... 5111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 423

Thread: The LNF Tuning Guide

  1. #281
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    26
    I've logged twice now for about 30 mins each time since taking the BPV apart to check the diaphragm and haven't seen any knock and I haven't changed the tune either. Not sure if the diaphragm was sitting funny or what but it seemed to have gone away after taking it apart and putting it back together.

  2. #282
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by BackyardTurbo_FTW View Post
    Thats what I did was make a custom PID. I didnt do [SENS.34.psi] tho, I just did [SENS.34] and selected psi from the drop down list. Then set the range to 0-2500. Showed nothing at all
    I just read through this whole thread again and didn't see a solution to logging fuel pressure. I know that a few of you are logging fuel pressure but I've searched all morning and can't find the answer. Help!

  3. #283
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    You need the latest 2.23 beta and the Commanded and Actual High Presssure fuel PID's are available in the scanner.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  4. #284
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Iam Broke View Post
    You need the latest 2.23 beta and the Commanded and Actual High Presssure fuel PID's are available in the scanner.
    Thanks! I have the 2.23.256 beta. I'll look them up tonight when I get home.

  5. #285
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    Remember, you have to add them to the table before you can chart or log them.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  6. #286
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    27
    I'm aware of that part. I just hadn't looked at the new parameter release since March and totally forgot about the desired and actual FP PID's being added.

  7. #287
    did my first pull with it and got some knock


    I did the timing smoothing also

    im gonna mess with it a little more now and see how it goes

    and im a newb at this stuff so far but im learning through the book that was suggested on here, but what do i put in the charts to datalog boost i cant find it, i had it there but then it disapeared

  8. #288
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    There is a parameter called Boost Sensor Lo Res that will give you the boost pressure in the lower charge pipe (good for > 22.4 psi at WOT) and you can use MAP for the manifold pressure up to 255 kPa or ~22.4 psi.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  9. #289
    ok thanks alot man

  10. #290
    i just put the map on my last log and and it said i hit 36psi?

  11. #291
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    You have to subtract BARO from it. (~14.7) That would be a bit over 21 psi boost.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  12. #292
    Senior Tuner BackyardTurbo_FTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    East Suckburg, PA
    Posts
    1,163
    Ive never seen KR that looked like that on a LNF car, that's strange Greg! I can send your file to your email and you can play with that a bit if you want?

  13. #293
    Yeah i thought it was a little strage too. I had some on my trifecta tune also so i was suprised to see that, athough not as bad. If you could do that nick i would appriciate it.

  14. #294
    Quote Originally Posted by Iam Broke View Post
    You have to subtract BARO from it. (~14.7) That would be a bit over 21 psi boost.
    Could i set that up in the chart to already subtract that out?

  15. #295
    Senior Tuner Iam Broke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,305
    Yes, make a custom PID.
    '12 Camaro T3 2SS/RS LS3 M6, SLP TVS 2300, Flex Fuel

  16. #296
    Senior Tuner cobaltssoverbooster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Dayhoff35 View Post
    Could i set that up in the chart to already subtract that out?
    Quote Originally Posted by Iam Broke View Post
    Yes, make a custom PID.
    [PID.11.PSI]-14.7
    2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman

  17. #297
    Senior Tuner Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Posts
    1,950
    Quote Originally Posted by BackyardTurbo_FTW View Post
    Ive never seen KR that looked like that on a LNF car, that's strange Greg! I can send your file to your email and you can play with that a bit if you want?
    If you set the decay value very high and the KR is somewhat more severe you get the long spikes that go away quickly and come back such as what is seen here.
    Steve Williams
    TunedbyFrost.com


  18. #298
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by cobaltssoverbooster View Post
    [PID.11.PSI]-14.7
    You can make a PID that measures the Manifold pressure and subtract barometric pressure

    ([SENS.30.MET] - [PID.2340.MET]) / 6.894757

  19. #299
    Senior Tuner cobaltssoverbooster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Jar Jar View Post
    You can make a PID that measures the Manifold pressure and subtract barometric pressure

    ([SENS.30.MET] - [PID.2340.MET]) / 6.894757
    yea i used what i put up to get started then moved to the charge pipe sensor cause im over 23psi but thats way more accurate than what i had for sure.
    2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman

  20. #300
    Senior Tuner BackyardTurbo_FTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    East Suckburg, PA
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    If you set the decay value very high and the KR is somewhat more severe you get the long spikes that go away quickly and come back such as what is seen here.
    I agree, but on the LNF we can't adjust that.