View Poll Results: Which platform?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2002 up Ecotec 5-speed J-body

    6 19.35%
  • 1997 up GT or GTP

    7 22.58%
  • 1998 up T56 F-body

    16 51.61%
  • other

    3 9.68%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: GM J, W, or F body for MPG/fun toy

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25

    GM J, W, or F body for MPG/fun toy

    Been looking at the three vehicles. The listed vehicles would be a
    2002 up Ecotec 5 speed
    1998 up GT or GTP
    1998 up F-body 6 speed

    They all will get about mid to high 20’s on the highway. With I/H/E, a wideband, HPTuners, and a possible methanol kit, their power will be much different between the three, but so is the weight. Would like to end up with mid to high 30’s on the highway. I know that tuning for max MPG wouldn't necessarily mean the most fun, but I think it would be challenging to get it working all together. I guess power goals would be to run in the 13's or 12's, but not much of a drag racer.

    J-body
    Pros
    Smallest engine
    5 speed
    Smallest vehicle

    Cons
    Not very fast, and would need a turbo to get up to the power that I would like, plus the lack of a 2 bar MAP sensor

    W-body
    Pros
    Boosted from the factory
    HUD

    Cons
    Huge
    Automatic Transmission that doesn’t like any power

    F-body
    Pros
    6-speed
    RWD
    Torque
    Lean cruise?

    Cons
    Probably the highest insurance deductible
    Highest purchase price.

    If you choose other, let me know what and why.
    Last edited by Dust; 09-23-2009 at 04:29 AM.

  2. #2
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    Wanted to bring this back up to the top, and see if anyone else wanted to vote.

  3. #3
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    99+ Fbody. end thread/
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  4. #4
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    BTW I own a GTP
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  5. #5
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    Bill, wonder if HPtuners would work on this?

    http://ucar.autos.yahoo.co.jp/detail...00CU0004730108

    would give me a year to learn the hptuner ropes

    Also found a f-body, but it was $10K, this one is only 2.5
    Last edited by Dust; 02-08-2010 at 05:50 AM.

  6. #6
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,266
    Yeah I'm pretty sure our software covers some cavaliers http://www.hptuners.com/products/vcmsuite_vehicles.php
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    I am just wondering about the import being different. Still have to convince myself and the wife that I need a different car for one year.

  8. #8
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    Back from the dead for more opinions.

  9. #9
    Tuner in Training 346ci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    37
    I vote f-body if you want a fun car that can be decently fuel efficient

  10. #10
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3
    Ecotec is the correct answer...spent nothing really setting up the turbo on my Ecotec Grand Am 5 speed...tuning is a sinch with HP tuners...a tank of gas lasts awhile...fast and easy to rep. (can pull out the motor/trans in 4hrs and have it running again with a new motor swapping the trans/flywheel in 4 and 1/2hrs) lots of room to work...set up a light run with a Camaro SS the other day had him off the line...he stayed at my rear bumper until we had to slow down (round 120) he wasnt the first that lost either...oh and the GA interior is banging...

    take a looksi...
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3805102

  11. #11
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Old Orchard Beach Maine
    Posts
    915
    Quote Originally Posted by 346ci View Post
    I vote f-body if you want a fun car that can be decently fuel efficient
    many 12 sec & under w bodies that get 30+mpg highway and i am sure the j body guys do even better being 4 cyl and smaller platform

    f body being rear drive should make it the most "fun" as far as driving goes

    j body should be most economical

    they all have fabulous mod potential

    I currently have 9 w bodies for our family 4 drivers , 1 project drag car , rest parts cars

    the sc'ed ones can be found for a grand or 2 as running driving cars , a couple hundred bucks in the right places and you are cracking 13's , around $800 will put you low 13's , $1200-1500 cracking 12's (less if sprayed) and they can run much faster than that but it takes a big investment in tranny to take 11's and quicker - quickest to date runs 8.6 @158 on a stock gm short block with lots of money in heads, turbo's , and tranny

    if autocross or road racing are in your future the f or j body would be better choices IMO

    the f body in ls1 form obviously left the factory as the most fun of the 3 platforms and has a big aftermarket but initial cash outlay is larger than the j or w body will be

    also in f bodies favor take a look at the forums on here gen 3 v8 is by far the most active so you should be able to get plenty of help
    PB's 1/4 mi 12.21 117.75 trap ,1/8 mi. 7.779 93.99trap , 1.949 short time (FWD W body)

  12. #12
    I'm a JBody owner. 2001 Z24. I have the GM charger and get 30 mpg, and guessing a high 13 sec car.

    When it was N/A I was getting 35mpg with tuning.

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    Want to bring this back to the top, and add a question. Is 30 mpg reasonable with tuning for a lightly modded f-body?

  14. #14
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Yes, as long as you don't go trying to make a 10 or 11 sec car, the F-body is the best bet off all these IMO on so many levels. You would have to mod all the others to make it just as fast as the Fbody and then your fuel mileage may suffer. When you get in boost on a small motor you will start to eat up gas. My 335 gets great gas mileage but if I get in boost a lot (not even anything crazy) it starts to kill the fuel mileage. When my WS6 was bolt ons only I got around 19-20 MPG around town and 26-27 MPG on some beach trips. I couldn't tell you how many WOT runs were per tank, but there were a ton (not quite the best for fuel mileage). I have since got smarter and don't drive like that

    A carefully picked mild cam for an Fbody can get you over 400 RWHP and still close to 30 MPG highway.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  15. #15
    Tuner smokestack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    West terre haute Indiana
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00 View Post
    Yes, as long as you don't go trying to make a 10 or 11 sec car, the F-body is the best bet off all these IMO on so many levels. You would have to mod all the others to make it just as fast as the Fbody and then your fuel mileage may suffer. When you get in boost on a small motor you will start to eat up gas. My 335 gets great gas mileage but if I get in boost a lot (not even anything crazy) it starts to kill the fuel mileage. When my WS6 was bolt ons only I got around 19-20 MPG around town and 26-27 MPG on some beach trips. I couldn't tell you how many WOT runs were per tank, but there were a ton (not quite the best for fuel mileage). I have since got smarter and don't drive like that

    A carefully picked mild cam for an Fbody can get you over 400 RWHP and still close to 30 MPG highway.
    That is insane.... And makes me want to pick your brain Fbody wise. So what cam? Stall as well? And just cam?

    And yes. I have watched all your vids heh. Nice ride. I am working my way up Slowly but one day
    Last edited by smokestack; 01-10-2012 at 03:33 PM.

  16. #16
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    Something in the low 220 duration range, really an LS6 setup will get you close to 400 HP with supporting bolt on and still get good gas mileage.

    My car is a manual. I think the autos get a little worse with converter slip and higher cruising RPM. Remember the 6 speed cruises at very low RPMs at highway speed.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    25
    WS6, I understand that I won't get 30mpg beating on it, I am just looking to be able to get 30mpg with cruise control set, and no beating on it.

  18. #18
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    25
    I have an Ls1 F body and a W body GTP. I would have to say that in all honesty that the F body is way more fun .... Yet the W body is much more daily driver friendly and much more gas friendly and can really surprise people , even other F bodies .... So .... I say get both : )

  19. #19
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Old Orchard Beach Maine
    Posts
    915
    since my earlier post in this thread close to a year ago I have added 2 ls1 f bodies to my stable and the bottom has fallen out on 4th gen cars especially ones with some miles on them...

    both cars were bought for 3 grand and change each , both are stock internals cars with what I would consider full bolt ons ( long tubes , intake , catback , ls6 intakes ,etc... as well as a fair amount of suspension ( umi/qa1 components on one , strano/koni on the other) , stereo upgrades ,mods etc.. my 6 speed car had recent ls7 clutch & hydraulics , my auto car had recent built trans with vigilante 3600 stall and 3.73's.

    the stick car went 11.95 for the previous owner (member here) on street tires not dr's ( I was there that night and saw him run 11.9's) the auto car should run similar as its a 1sz car with no frills and nearly identical mods , the stick car gets compliments everywhere it goes as its clean and straight in and out - looks and drives like 30k miles not 230k lol

    my point is that high price isnt really a negative on these ls1 cars anymore , and a friend just picked up a pretty clean ls1 camaro for 3500 and I just missed a 2000 formula for 2800 so the deals are out there on them

    I still love my sleeper w bodies too - a guy I know just went 11.9 @114 for under a grand including purchase price with one that he gutted and sprayed hard

    both are great , rwd is more fun to drive but a fast 4 door fwd buick will screw with a lot of peoples heads at the track - everyone expects an ls1 f body to run 12's or faster do it with a w body and it shocks most people
    PB's 1/4 mi 12.21 117.75 trap ,1/8 mi. 7.779 93.99trap , 1.949 short time (FWD W body)

  20. #20
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    600
    I am in a similar dilemma. I want another fun car, somewhat limited budget, and would like to be able to tune and modify it.

    I have owned F-body, W-Body, and Deltas amongst many others. I don't know if a J-body is worth it, especially when I can go buy a Regal GS and have a lot more fun and not get noticed.

    I am leaning towards a Regal GS right now because it is a little more comfortable in size and has a lot of potential. But if I do, this time around I am going to intercool the damn W-Body.

    I'm not looking to do a whole lot, but I figure a transmission job, porting the S/C myself, modest exhaust improvements, intercooling, and maybe rocker arms not sure. I just think there is really a lot there for $1,000 in aftermarket.

    Could a J-body really provide that much fun? I'm not thinking so.

    Could an F-body? Yeah, and then some.