Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: MPG and Timing

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    13

    MPG and Timing

    Im tyring to increase my MPG, and Im wondering if there is any thing else beside the high octane tables I should be adjusting. And if that’s it can I see and example of someones?
    2001 Pontiac Bonneville SSEi - Intense FWI - Home Brewed Tune - 3in Cat'ed DP Res Delete - 3.6 Pulley - Solid Front Mount
    2006 Monte Carlo LTZ - Working on a Tune

  2. #2
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    71
    You could adjust your MAF curve so that at freeway speed/load your running 15.5:1 AFR. This AFR should give you max MPG although your engine will run warmer and test your cooling system a little.
    *************************
    Scott in San Diego with a L-67 Super Stalker.
    Mods in the next month or so, yeah its a moving target!
    Gen 5 blower, N* throttle body, LQ4 MAF,3.4 pulley for starters.

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lawrenceville, Ga
    Posts
    327
    Adjusting the MAF won't work as well as you might think, unless you run in open loop all the time. The PCM will adjust the AFR back to 14.7 using the narrowband O2 sensor and fuel trims. The narrowband isn't very good at anything other 14.7 +/- .5, but it is very good at 14.7.

    The first things that come to mind for increasing MPG other then the spark tables are Accel Enrichment, Decel Enleanment, O2 sensor offset (if HPT supported this, you can ask them to add it), and transmission shift points.
    -Eddie

    1998 GTP - 3.4 [3.2] [3.0] MPS - custom CAI - F.1 Ram Air hood - XP Cam - Ported Heads - 1.84/1.60 Si valves - 1.6 HS Roller Rockers - 72mm Ported TB - LQ4 MAF - 42.5# Lucas Injectors - Pacesetters
    1/4 PB - 13.025 @ 106.81 MPH w/ 2.069 60'
    2021 Chevrolet Colorado 2.8 Baby Duramax

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Mitten
    Posts
    38
    Are there any tips on adjusting DE? I've tried a few things but with no real positive results.
    2006 Pontiac GTO, Torrid Red, M6, "LS2.5"
    - LS3 Heads; 11.5:1
    - ARH Headers
    - Magnaflow
    - Svede
    - RipShift race

    - No Lift Shift


    2012 Chevrolet Cruze, Blue Topaz Metallic, M6, 1.8
    - Stock
    - 42 MPG

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lawrenceville, Ga
    Posts
    327
    I don't know, I've never really tuned DE. I am running 2005 GTP DE tables, which are leaner then the 98 GTP, but I don't know how big of a difference it made since I imported 2005 AE tables at the same time.
    -Eddie

    1998 GTP - 3.4 [3.2] [3.0] MPS - custom CAI - F.1 Ram Air hood - XP Cam - Ported Heads - 1.84/1.60 Si valves - 1.6 HS Roller Rockers - 72mm Ported TB - LQ4 MAF - 42.5# Lucas Injectors - Pacesetters
    1/4 PB - 13.025 @ 106.81 MPH w/ 2.069 60'
    2021 Chevrolet Colorado 2.8 Baby Duramax

  6. #6
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    13
    So if i copy a 2005 GTPs Accel Enrichment and Decel Enleanment tables that should help me out?
    2001 Pontiac Bonneville SSEi - Intense FWI - Home Brewed Tune - 3in Cat'ed DP Res Delete - 3.6 Pulley - Solid Front Mount
    2006 Monte Carlo LTZ - Working on a Tune

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    31
    What about adjusting what the computer considers Stoich? Every tune I've looked at for 3800's has had it stock at 14.70020, but why couldn't we bump it up to 14.9 or 15.0. Is that too far out of the the NB O2's efficency range? I believe we'd still be fine for PE, because that fuels differently.

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Old Orchard Beach Maine
    Posts
    915
    Quote Originally Posted by DanGTP View Post
    What about adjusting what the computer considers Stoich? Every tune I've looked at for 3800's has had it stock at 14.70020, but why couldn't we bump it up to 14.9 or 15.0. Is that too far out of the the NB O2's efficency range? I believe we'd still be fine for PE, because that fuels differently.

    before doing that if you run 10% ethanol remember E10 stoich is 14.1
    PB's 1/4 mi 12.21 117.75 trap ,1/8 mi. 7.779 93.99trap , 1.949 short time (FWD W body)

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner passingpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    301
    I have one for you. Reverse the boost bypass "modification" that was once popular. Loosen the nuts and pull the diaphram housing UP. This will delay boost until you really are in WOT. You'll see less airflow (and knock) at part throttle. Less air will need less fuel to maintain stoich. What kind of mileage are you getting now? What kind of driving do you do- city/highway, spirited/sedate? Calculate gas economy using gas pump and trip odometer, not the DIC. It won't be accurate until after you calibrate your IFR table. (I recommend the odometer assuming you're running stock wheels.)

  10. #10
    Tuner macca_779's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Katherine N.T Australia
    Posts
    70
    Since the US models never had lean cruise. What HPT need to impliment is a semi open loop primary fuel table with an RPM axis like what EFI LIVE has in their Custom OS's. Like this you dont even need PE if you so desire.

    The way it works is you must disable LTFT's. But anywhere where 14.63 (Or EQ 1.0 if you view in EQ) is commanded you will have STFT's being applied. Anywhere its any other value, you will be running open loop.

    Last edited by macca_779; 10-02-2009 at 01:20 AM.

  11. #11
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Mitten
    Posts
    38
    Comparing the few files I've seen, it appears that the 04+ DE tables are the same as in the 03 and older cars.
    2006 Pontiac GTO, Torrid Red, M6, "LS2.5"
    - LS3 Heads; 11.5:1
    - ARH Headers
    - Magnaflow
    - Svede
    - RipShift race

    - No Lift Shift


    2012 Chevrolet Cruze, Blue Topaz Metallic, M6, 1.8
    - Stock
    - 42 MPG

  12. #12
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    13
    I just filled up and im getting 18.8 MPG on this tank it was almost half high way half city. I would also say i drive fairly aggressivie in the city too. Im going to change my DE tables and see what that dose for me.
    2001 Pontiac Bonneville SSEi - Intense FWI - Home Brewed Tune - 3in Cat'ed DP Res Delete - 3.6 Pulley - Solid Front Mount
    2006 Monte Carlo LTZ - Working on a Tune

  13. #13
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lawrenceville, Ga
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by Nexuscocker View Post
    I just filled up and im getting 18.8 MPG on this tank it was almost half high way half city. I would also say i drive fairly aggressivie in the city too. Im going to change my DE tables and see what that dose for me.
    I wouldn't complain too much if you drive fairy aggressivly. I have to drive like a normal person to hit 18.8. All of my driving is in suburbia with VERY little over 60 MPH, normally I'm in the 18 - 17.5 range.
    -Eddie

    1998 GTP - 3.4 [3.2] [3.0] MPS - custom CAI - F.1 Ram Air hood - XP Cam - Ported Heads - 1.84/1.60 Si valves - 1.6 HS Roller Rockers - 72mm Ported TB - LQ4 MAF - 42.5# Lucas Injectors - Pacesetters
    1/4 PB - 13.025 @ 106.81 MPH w/ 2.069 60'
    2021 Chevrolet Colorado 2.8 Baby Duramax

  14. #14
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    13
    On this tank im going to drive like a "normal" person to see what I get. And i am happy with 18.8, but if i can get more i want it.
    2001 Pontiac Bonneville SSEi - Intense FWI - Home Brewed Tune - 3in Cat'ed DP Res Delete - 3.6 Pulley - Solid Front Mount
    2006 Monte Carlo LTZ - Working on a Tune