I was wondering are these tunes properly set up to calibrate MAF. Initially they were configured to run SD OL. I now want to calibrate my MAF, so I reset the MAF high and low frequency to stock and began to log some files.
File maf cal log 1 was recorded using MAF Cal.hpt.
The MAF calibration tables Airflow vs. Freq. Low and Airflow vs. Freq. High of MAF Cal.hpt were adjusted based on data from file maf cal log 1 as well as a couple of other logs. This formed the new tune file MAF Cal r1.hpt
Today I logged file 8-30 maf cal r1 using MAF Cal r1.hpt Now my AFRs are very lean compared with yesterday’s rich values. In the upper frequency ranges approximately 6% was added, since they were about that rich. Today’s upper ranges are now extremely lean.
It is cooler today would this affect those tables?
The engine is a LS2 with 227/230 cam, headers, ported 243 heads, and a ported LS2 intake.
Thanks for any help