huh. interesting. my "small engine truck" is all 100s. its not the small small engine, but a 5.3 aint huge
huh. interesting. my "small engine truck" is all 100s. its not the small small engine, but a 5.3 aint huge
On my truck (418ci, turbo @ 9.7lbs) it worked great.. The one thing I did notice is that it made the already annoyingly aggressive burst knock even worse.. Which is logical given that I did feel a change in throttle response and tip in performance. At least I know its working (increased cyl air delta).. I am going get rid of burst knock. .032 cyl air delta as the max the table can be programmed to seems silly for my truck.
2006 Trailblazer SS - Stalled, Cammed, Tuned, Turbo'd, Built, and Stroked.
Runs on cash, blood, sweat, and tears...... and 93 octane.
2007 Cadillac STS-V - Stock.
I wouldn't get rid of the burst knock all together, just make it only half as aggresive. You need that to kick in when it is actually needed, especially during hot summer months.Originally Posted by Blades
____________________________
2008 Convertible Corvette
Haltech CAI | Kooks Headers and X-pipe | 227/231 .613/.617 lift 115 LSA CAM | Tuned to death
Since I have a much larger motor than stock and I'm boosted; it has an effect on part throttle boost in a noticable way. Perhaps I should cut down the 2k-3k rpm multipliers and set them to .5 like the rest..
2006 Trailblazer SS - Stalled, Cammed, Tuned, Turbo'd, Built, and Stroked.
Runs on cash, blood, sweat, and tears...... and 93 octane.
2007 Cadillac STS-V - Stock.
Which table would help me get that off idle throttle response. I have a 5.3L CCSB truck with all ETC TM removed but it still doesn't feel strong like my 2002 5.3L I had....thanks for the help.
Printscreen of my tables are attached.
Bump for a look at my screenshot to see what will help improve throttle response!
Damn, my '08 vette is already 100's.
____________________________
2008 Convertible Corvette
Haltech CAI | Kooks Headers and X-pipe | 227/231 .613/.617 lift 115 LSA CAM | Tuned to death
Why am I not seeing this tab in my VCM editor ?
It only shows up to Speed Density ?
need the latest BETA
2008 GMC Sierra RCSB 4.8L
Hooray! This table fixed my car's sluggish throttle response that I've been complaining about for years now!
But unfortunately now my scanner is broken, it tries to read the parameters and bombs out with the error message "file dx20.exe is missing".
Has anyone have an idea how to fix this? The scanner worked perfectly before I installed this beta version.
2005 Vert Z51 MZ6
Horsepower Sales 954-984-8040
4:10's, FAST 92, A/R Headers w/cats, G5x3, .040 gaskets AFR 205 heads ORIG CLUTCH
472rwhp/414rwtq
Best pre-cam:1/4-1.730, [email protected]
Best w-cam, pre-FAST 1/4-1.666, [email protected]
Best w-cam & FAST 1/4-1.519, [email protected] DA-793
Best w-cam & AFR heads 1/4-1.445, [email protected] DA-581 1/8-1.445, [email protected] DA-581
Top speed 185 (so far...) 0-60 mph 2.59 sec (track)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUX3UNFl124
That happened to me too. I reverted my scanner back to 2.22 for the time being.
Bill Winters
Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
Out of the LSx tuning game
Thats strange, I don't have dx20.exe on my comp and everything works fine for me. I can't really find any info on it either.
How did you do that? Uninstall 2.23 and reinstall 2.22 for everything? I couldn't figure out how to go back on the scanner alone.
2005 Vert Z51 MZ6
Horsepower Sales 954-984-8040
4:10's, FAST 92, A/R Headers w/cats, G5x3, .040 gaskets AFR 205 heads ORIG CLUTCH
472rwhp/414rwtq
Best pre-cam:1/4-1.730, [email protected]
Best w-cam, pre-FAST 1/4-1.666, [email protected]
Best w-cam & FAST 1/4-1.519, [email protected] DA-793
Best w-cam & AFR heads 1/4-1.445, [email protected] DA-581 1/8-1.445, [email protected] DA-581
Top speed 185 (so far...) 0-60 mph 2.59 sec (track)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUX3UNFl124
Made a 2.23 directory and moved the EXE's there and then re-installed 2.22, made a 2.22 directory and copied the EXE's there. I would copy the EXE's in and out as I needed to. Right now I'm running the 2.23 Editor and 2.22 Scanner. Probably not best practice but hey.
Bill Winters
Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
Out of the LSx tuning game
This table is how guys Like Chuck at COW sell their tunes with EFI. "You feel the throttle response?!!!" Man, that engine cal is GREAT!!! Good job chuck!!
And all he did was change this table....
Chuck had a beta of EFI that had this table viewable/editable for over a year now. But that isn't all that makes his tunes have great throttle response. His A4 tunes are pretty kick ass.
Bill Winters
Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
Out of the LSx tuning game
Bill if you are getting an error with the beta please contact support so we can try to figure out why you are receiving this error.
Thanks,
Bill
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
I just updated the Throttle Rate table and it made a noticable difference. Especially with the Stage 3 Monster clutch that is installed. Before the ramp change, the RPMs needed to be 1500 or higher to start moving without exeperiencing chatter. Now with the ramp change the the RPMs can be lower than 1500 when starting from a dead stop.
post was not valid
Last edited by Bow Tie 67; 07-30-2009 at 09:30 AM. Reason: incorrect info added
Thank you for your kind words!
Actually......NO.This table is how guys Like Chuck at COW sell their tunes with EFI. "You feel the throttle response?!!!" Man, that engine cal is GREAT!!! Good job chuck!!
And all he did was change this table....
This is NOT how I do what I do and I've never used that table...I have no use for it.
You should come by with your tuner cable one day so I can show you what I
DO.....DO.
Chuck CoW
