Bill does v6 n v8 require different licensing? I have 02 Silverado unlocked this one is a v6. that's only thing I can see different. need to get it gone tomorrow
Type: Posts; User: prostreet1967
Bill does v6 n v8 require different licensing? I have 02 Silverado unlocked this one is a v6. that's only thing I can see different. need to get it gone tomorrow
this is second time I've had a car to dyno and can't license it. I have 02 Silverado unlocked they bring me 02 Silverado pcm and it says license not available. I had them buy 02 Silverado pcm it...
is there a way around it starting timer when I bump in?
bump
having issue with eq commanded once i get into boost n go back to cruise PE stays enabled
anyone
haD same issue was to rich in boosted areas
bump
65954
my ve up to 270 kpa is 70s on ve table im lost as to why other cars ive helped tune are beyond 100 in boost
put e85 on top of dam near no gasoline changed stoich to 9.70 wideband indicated rich switched to lambda to confirm and it was rich got it to where it needed to be by changing stoich to 11.6. truck...
it works now. thanks ed.
I do have a question now that I'm using lambda how do I go about setting up my PE and BE will leave it as is but is there a way to change those to lambda?
will do tonight. is aeromotive boost reference regulator with 58 psi Base pressure. no meth
that's weird because they show lambda on my end. will try them out. thanks for the help
it's in post 17
channel list
65585655866558765588
ok fixed that last night. error still seems wrong. it is showing actual difference and not a percentage like with afr.
wide band now reading lambda, it shows .70 - .85 just like scanner. what would be beat way to get it dialed in
.play with stoich number?
got lambda logging now. wide band still not reading lambda yet will work on that tomorrow. read some places wide band still reads correct with e85. meaning 11.0 on wide band translates to roughly....
ed why would my lambda error be off? (pic above)
and will i be able to paste special on ve changes since the percentage will be much smaller due to range of lambda.
thanks for ur help. was gonna...
where n what do i close it with ) or ]
copied math from working wb math just used data from ur tool. it doesnt look closed
65564
where n what do i close it with ) or ]
Got it working only have short log from late last night. my error doesnt seem right its showing actual difference vs percentage.
also not sure where the .238 Came from on eq in math.
will i paste...
6555665557
would this be correct? where would this info come into play on newest scanner