Murfie looking at your spreadsheet, i understand all the math with the high, low, and breakpoint. I dont understand why on the psi offset multiplier table the new multiplier is so much different even...
Type: Posts; User: Devildog1325
Murfie looking at your spreadsheet, i understand all the math with the high, low, and breakpoint. I dont understand why on the psi offset multiplier table the new multiplier is so much different even...
So in your experience throttle angle error has more to do with the difference in the throttle body model and not the torque tables?
Yes those are the parameters some factory tunes have these filled in with numbers and some don't. I wonder if it would be better to tune the controller with the key on engine off or while driving...
I also went the route of changing torque and inverse tables to correct throttle errors. I don't know if I fully understand but my understanding is the pedal input gives a torque number from the DD...
Its actually an 06 just need to look at the stock trans tables previous owner supposedly turned down stock line pressure/ force motor tables due to a hard shift and in reality the trans was just...
Does anybody have a stock tune for an 07 tbss im sure an 06 would be the same
Any Confirmation on if the new MPVI2 will support the 99-04?
The inferred map reading will not be right until you correct the speed density tables there are also tables for the SIP sensor this will also throw off the boost gauge on the cluster it more than...
From my experience yes you will always have some throttle angle error on abrupt throttle movements. If you feel like it is transient or injector related then go down that path but looks like...
If you have correct injector data and you have correct throttle body data I would leave them alone and work on your torque tables. The information is out there on how to correct this and people go...
I used the scj monoblade data that has been provided on the forum and I think there is one in the repository. Mine drives like factory I cant tell any difference between it and the stock TB but I...
I usually just put a vacuum cap over the other barb it used to go to the egr. The part that your calling a temp sensor is what plugged into the egr(it may be a temp sensor I don't remember) But they...
That is the Supercharger Inlet Pressure sensor keep it connected with the vacuum source. This is usually attached to the EGR but looks like it has been deleted. If you take this off it will cause...
I wonder if we can get the calculator for the oak pcm gt500 that would be great. I didn't know it was on the 13/14 gt500 I haven't even looked.
I have never seen that table touched but it would be nice if there was specific information for the GT500 as there logic is different than other mustangs.
Has anybody used roush, saleen, or whipple tune files for the 05-09? Looks like they are adding something in there strategy over the factory cal to get the supercharger to work better with the tune....
There is no load with failed maf for the GT500
I don't think its as much as lower flow rate control as it is the spray pattern causing allot more fuel to stick to the port walls. I have seen multiple people not just you and I have the same...
I would say your issue has allot to do with those injectors. As long as your injector data and maf values are correct keep working your transient tables.
I've done 2 supercharged 3v's with the stock 07-09 47LB GT500 injectors and they are a pain in the ass to get the transient fueling right with them or at least they were with me.
I run two DW pump's in my personal car at 700hp and never had an issue. I would at least run a booster on the stock pump if you are going to run boost.
Yes but it is not hard to tune the Voltage table.
DW makes a drop in pump that fits the stock hat. You may still have to end up running a booster depends on how far you are going with boost. I know 2 of these pumps in a Shelby hat usually support up...
I thought you could still log with the HP software and all you needed to the ngauge for was to read and write with. Is there not enough parameters in the scanner to log properly? I haven't go to try...
I'm glad you got it figured out!