Search:

Update. I disabled my IMRCs (forced them open at all times) in my tune on the stock manifold and retuned the VCT settings and got it running great as it sits so once the CJ goes on I at least have a...

Thank you I was not sure if that file was using a 60mm throttle body or the twin 65mm.

Why is the effective area and predicted throttle angle so different in the 2007-2008 GT500 stock tune files in the repository vs the 2010-2014? They use the same stock throttle body and these are all...

2015 has twice as many mapped points and they seem quite a bit different than the 2013 file I have.

Thats what im doing at this point but im concerned about it having poor drivability with the stock cam angles since they are based off the IMRCs being closed at many of those mapped points especially...

I think ive got the basics with this file as far as the IMRCs being completely deleted in the tune and the throttle tables that we have available adjusted for the twin 60mm throttle body ill be using...

Whoops I thought that was to commanded 100% airflow not pull 100% lol. Is traction control airmass setup the same way?

Its still limiting but now no more jagged spark its pulling throttle and spark. Current file and log. I need to turn TCS off in the tune because even with advance trac off completely and in track...

Thank you. I will make those changes and a few others then relog it.

Drops spark really badly in 1st gear especially. Ive tried setting the spark only torque management table to 1.00 in all the defined cells then it just pulls throttle plate really badly and its even...

I dont know who you are but let me tell you something. Brittany is my wife and that is our email and there is nothing shady about me. Those two cars you think you fixed the only issue causing that KR...

I have it in a histogram and yes it did boost much higher than I had intended and I turned the wg duty cycle down to 75-80% in the midrange one revision before the final one. Mind you John that was...

What other questions do you have John? You do not know the whole story here.

The largest issue I had was lack of logs and data. Literally weeks would go by and all I got was a few short 2-3 minute logs with very little data and then all of a sudden he sends the log of him...

He had fresh AC Delcos in gapped at 0.032" IIRC.

Yes LOL most of the ones I go to tune out there on 91 with a 24 psi tune the most I could get out of them zero knock was 12* maybe 12.8 LOL. Some could have had flaso KR though but I did not want to...

Of course. I too would like to know what happened although the log may not show exactly what happened it might. I would not be shocked to see it drop rail pressure to half of commanded and end up...

I have not even seen the last log of of when it went up in smoke yet so I will be seeing this one for the first time.

Thank you Tyler and yes I generally do make my files more aggressive than this but the fact that I knew this car spends most of its time racing and also the issues the car was having lead me to keep...

I agree I have run a ton more on my own car on 93 and I planned on running a couple more degrees of timing but because of the issues the car was having I left the timing low like that.

You are out of turbo so to speak most likely.

Those cam angle changes I have used on at least 200 cars including my own car. They are mild and help smooth the drivability more than anything. His previous tune done by Dave at DDM was even milder...

Exactly I made it purposely mild because I knew he autocrossed the car so I knew it would spend lots of time at wide open throttle.

Look that the whole tune but mostly DALs, MALT, WG desired duty cycle, main spark especially intake max exhaust max. PE lambda.

Look away. I want people to see the tune.