Thank you for your help. I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out if or what I missed. If anyone could help me I would greatly appreciate it. below is an attatched file. Did I miss something? I still have an SES light after a drive cycle.
Printable View
Thank you for your help. I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out if or what I missed. If anyone could help me I would greatly appreciate it. below is an attatched file. Did I miss something? I still have an SES light after a drive cycle.
Thank you, I will try this now.:hi::drivin:
"! Unable to open file
index was outside the of bounds of array"
Is this because I am running windows 7?
Please bear with me I am doing my best trying to learn:confused:
Where do I get Beta 2.23? You my call me and expalain quick if you dont mind(or anyone else for that matter).
Email support at: [email protected]
you need to email support with the serial number from the back of your box. They will add a download link to the beta for your account on the website.
Thank You
Does anyone know the releationship between changing these DTCs to "no error reported" and getting the readyness test to run. Is there anyway other then driving the car under the prescribed conditons to get these test to actually run, regardless of whether there are actual problems or not. If HP Tuners could get them to run that would be great. I've been trying for weeks to get mine to run on a completly stock vehicle.
Thanks 8850, I had missed the P2270-73 checks.
Thanks for this thread guys. Could not get the tests mentioned to not be "incomplete" and could not figure out what DTC's I was missing. I even compared my tune to 8850's and didn't see anything obvious but setting them all to "no error reported" did the trick.
:cheers:
Bill, I just went back and took a look at the file I posted and don't know how but I posted the wrong info. You want all items with a check and "no error reported". Sorry for the mistake.
I went in and corrected it so it should be good now. My screen shot on page one was correct. Sorry for the error!
Ah, ok. Makes sense. Thats the only way it worked for me; with all DTCs set to no error reported. The SES checkbox didn't seem to matter. I could still have the MAF disabled and all tests still went to complete so I don't have to go tune my MAF.
Good trick. Thanks.
:cheers:
I didn't try without all boxes unchecked so I suppose from your results it doesn't make any difference in that respect. With the boxes checked it worked so that's what I went to the inspection station with.
If one were to try this, and the vehicle didn't keep running... one would think because of the MAF. If one sets the MAF codes to 2-No MIL (101,102,103) and she cranked and stayed running. should be good to go now right?
Having the MAF as No-MIL wouldn't cause an issue for emmissions, correct?
I kept my P0103 DTC to mil on first error (no DTC light) because I am speed density and it did not pose a problem when I got the emissions tests done.
I have put about 1000 miles on my current tune and still have not got evap and o2 sensor to say complete. I passed emissions with two failed reediness monitors and a dyno test. Just want to make sure it is all working properly, how long should it take to complete naturally?
After burning up over $200 of gas in my 2500 silverado trying to clear the evap code I decided to come here and start searching for a "fix" and found this thread.
I just wanted to say...
I love you guys.
...and I mean that in the most homo-erotic way possible.